WAR! / Stem voor Oorlog!
GEN. DE LA REY
A vote for Revolution et Libertas is a vote for activity.
It is a vote for war.
Yes War
Yes believe it or not
War in a war game.
We will attack!
The time for sitting around and pretending to play while your friends die of boredom is now finished.
If you want peace forever this is not the party to vote for!
A vote for Revolution et Libertas will cause explosions
And WAR WAR WAR !
So stretch yourself and vote for war in a war game!
Comments
YES SIR YES!
no... 🙂
Got the message i believe it has something do do with war.
At least we can count on your vote then. Thanks
Spoken like a sales person! Regretfully i'm running for congress myself so my vote will go to DEM NL!
Maybe next election then?
Who do you want to attack?
Will we be home by Christmas? (Or will the war go on and on...)
How much does it cost?
Shouting WAR, triggers me to continue with the rest of the chorus if I don't have any further information...
erep messed up my nice link...
I was linking to the wikipedia page of "War (Edwin Starr song)", but erep messes up the % signs in the url.
Maybe for everyone's ease. The chorus is: "WAR! War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothin'!"
best to use a site like tinyurl in the future 😉 99.99% change it won't f up.
sometimes war is needed sadly. but war for the sake of war is a waste of resources and usually leads to bad things.
We attack anybody except our so called allies.
Home for Christmas, maybe not even left yet. The war should go on as long as possible, and should include us getting wiped a couple of times.
cares how much it cost, rather calculate how much it costs to fight for so called allies, and the cost of those fallen from inactivity boredom.
The nation building and activity benefits are desperately and urgently needed to prevent even more people from dying. We need an enemy and a reason to continue playing this game within E-Netherlands.
"Who" cares
voted
Who in ReL will organize and lead this war then? You can't declare war for the sake of it and assume others will pick up the slack.
What slack are you referring to?
If you want to you can be the SS for the minister of attack. Garmr is not scared of some action?
I invaded and wiped Belgium three times if that's worth something. I meant to say ReL votes for war but has no people involved in anything MoD related to actually serve the country during war.
I am sorry you have such a low opinion of the capability of players that are not in division 3 or 4. However you should not fear as REL is not an island and has many friends in other parties which may surpass your selection criteria. In addition we will scrap the MOD post if we come to power and replace it with a MOA post in which nobody in an party has experience except maybe Kaczyk.
Garmr pls. ReL is perfectly able to trounce Norway for the 3rd time xoxo
Or perhaps you could follow suite with the NSAP and attack one of the countries attacking the UK?
Well thats not a bad idea, if you would declare war to one of eUK attackers.
Cool, we have a minister of attack!
wow! that girl is really flexible...
V
When BG first came with this topic, people thought we were crazy.
So we can only welcome this change in eNL politics!
NO
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/moar-woar-1-2435714/1/20
Yeah, indeed. War for the sake of war is stupid.
So war for the sake of what will not be stupid?
Because war for so called allies in order to join their alliance is 100 % stupid by now.
It isn't war for the sake of war. It is war for the sake of activity.
Just don't feed the trolls
any war would be better that the stupid state of affairs we have had lately..
its purely a war game for the eCitizens.. the only way to keep the game interesting on any level is with a military plan and interest.. otherwise this all is a waste of time..
Thanks for the support Nomad, well stated. Sometimes I find my self longing for the days we were wiped by Poland, fighting against the odds against the evil tyrant. Since those days we just don't have any worthwhile battles.