[TT] Changes in the Revolutionary Committee
Leon Gutierrez
Greetings everyone, this article will be discussing a recent constitutional discussion that deals with Revolutionary Committe and as the proponent of the proposal, I would like to express how it will aim to work for the present, to then be voted on at a later date to see if it is how it should work in the future.
Here is what is documented to change, along with when the vote took place and how many voted. My aim of the proposal was to make a new precedent that all members and aspiring members of the Revolutionary Committee, whether they are non-voting or voting members, are expected to be contributing to an active task or campaign within the party. These tasks or campaigns are divided up into three key categories that are mentioned as individual sections of part IV of the SFP constitution which are the Economic, Domestic and International affairs of the party.
Originally in the older version of the SFP Constitution back in 2011, this proposed section was actually in the constitution but was ratified out. Therefore this proposal is to revert that and to bring that portion of the constitution back, which will tie in and serve as an example as to what the expectation and responsibilities of the RC will be in order to actively contribute to the areas of Economic, Domestic and International affairs, as they are outlined in Part IV of the SFP Constitution.
Before:
Section 6: Roles and Projects
1. All Party members can play a role as a Volunteer on any Party program, campaign or task.
2. It is the responsibility of the Revolutionary Committee to ensure that the Party is actively engaged in eRep affairs. This does not mean that only RC members can play a leading role, nor that only RC members must carry out all tasks.
After:
Section 6: Roles and Projects
1. All Party members can play a role as a Volunteer on any Party program, campaign or task.
2. It is the responsibility of the Revolutionary Committee to ensure that the Party is actively engaged in eRep affairs. This does not mean that only RC members can play a leading role, nor that only RC members must carry out all tasks.
3. It is the responsibility of the Chair of the RC to ensure that the Party has at least one active project or campaign in each of the following general areas of interest: Domestic Policy, International Policy and Economics.
4. At least one member of the RC, or other Volunteer, should have responsibility for directing one or more activities in each of these areas.
5. Each member of the RC, or other Volunteer, should have responsibility for a particular task or effort, whether it is a short-term goal or part of a longer-term campaign or project.
6. The following are suggestions or guides as to what would define the Domestic, International Policy and Economics but are not required to be nor limited to be as follows:
6a. RC Members and Volunteers with responsibility for Domestic work propose and lead work with respect to recruitment and mentoring, elections to Congress, participation in the Executive, relations with other eUSA parties and militias, and domestic media and public relations.
6b. RC Members and Volunteers with responsibility for International policy should propose and lead work with respect to participation in the Internationale and the International Brigades, relations with parties and militias outside of the eUSA, the Party's militia participation in wars and battles, sending Party members abroad to work with other groups, and international public relations.
6c. RC Members and Volunteers with responsibility for Economic policy should propose and lead work with respect to managing and directing the SFP Commune co-ops and communes, recommending economic policy initiatives to SFP Congress members, developing and promoting ideas for an anarcho-socialist political economy, promoting collaboration between communes and co-ops domestically and internationally, and generally promoting social well-being and economic security.
The forum vote was 11 yeas - 0 nays 12.24.2017 00:57:33
The ratified proposal will be on a "Trial-run" for the next 15 days, in order to see how it well it goes and if/or needs refinement in order to be an official constitutional amendment. After the 15 days pass, the party will be asked to participate in the upcoming vote and discussion that will be deciding if the proposal is to become ratified.
Hopefully this serves as an expectation that within the revolutionary committee, it is not simply a place of "elites" that speak quietly in an in-game thread but are party members whom have stepped up to become involved in actively contributing to the development of the Socialist Freedom Party, that when one joins the revolutionary committee, one should expect to work for the duration of their term much more-so in party activities. The take away is that the Revolutionary Committee must actively be engaged and lead by-example.
Documentation for SFP party members to access:
Discussion of the proposal
The vote for the trial-run
Official declaration of a trial-period on said proposal
Until next time
-Leon Gutierrez
This article is also published under the SFP Freedom Writer’s Guild.
Come join Bear Cavalry:https://www.erepublik.com/en/military/military-unit/335
Come say hello on our discor
😛https://discord.gg/QCZVJYE
Comments
[TT] Changes in the Revolutionary Committee https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tt-changes-in-the-revolutionary-committee-2660042/1/20
SFP CONSTITUTION
Section 13: Democracy and Voluntarism
4. Party members who hold a minority view on any matter shall be respected and listened-to. While majority decisions are sometimes necessary to reach agreement on a plan of action, they do not imply the need for Party members to follow a centralist or authoritarian party line on all matters.
- - - - - - - -
Tell me, are you gonna change this soon?
Is the current party-leadership abiding to this?
You don’t hold any views, besides calling everyone names and verbal assaults. Goodbye, go find another party to harass.
Why so edgy?
https://www.erepublik.com/es/article/presentacion-y-encuesta-presentation-and-survey-2660031/1/20
o7
SFP CONSTITUTION
Section 13: Democracy and Voluntarism
Sub-section 13.4: Party Proposals
2. Any Party member, be they a part of the RC or not, may put forward a Party Proposal.
4. Party Proposals are approved by a simple majority in a poll of the entire membership.
5. All Party Proposals must be a public poll, meaning all can see how others vote.
7. If three-quarters (3/4s) of the total party membership approves of a Proposal, then it can not be over ruled by the RC.
- - - - - - - - -
My proposal: It shall be allowed that the members of SFP cast their votes in Congressional Primary Elections through the party-feed in-game. It is not a prerequisite to register on the SFP Forum in order to participate in party elections.
- - - - - - - - -
You know the procedure, I petition you to act accordingly our party constitution!
No, continue voting on the forums. Keeps the tallies in one spot. Easier to count for others. It’s not that hard to create a forum account. If you’re able to create an Erepublik account, you’re more than able to create a SFP forum account.
This is only your oinion. One member - one vote!
Can't you read??
7. If three-quarters (3/4s) of the total party membership approves of a Proposal, then it can not be over ruled by the RC.
using a forum makes it harder to hide your multis phail.. and that is the real reason you don't want to use them.
You wanna tell me that TheNorm on the SFP forum or Piggy on the eUS-filth-forum can hunt down multies better then eRepublik Labs in this game?? What a load of crap! 😃
V!!
o7
o8
What could possibly go wrong?
🙂
Everything!
You have shown everyone what you really are: bloody bureaucrats, who fix things that are not broken!
Osmany Ramon is turning in his e-grave!!!!
You are a troll.
Blatant ad-hominem attack without credibility
0/10.
Why are you constantly deleting my shouts in our party-feed?
Are you feeling uncomfortable with the truth?
Are you trying to silence critics from members of SFP?
Please do read Section 13 article 4. of our party Constitution!
Will you now sanction yourself according the "morals & ethics" you yourself prescribed?
Speak up, Max!
all evidence suggests you are unworthy of a valid reply. Sorry Phil.
My name is Rosa, Jeff!
How about replying to my proposal above?
No its because you bring nothing to the table, besides unhinged rants and uncalled for verbal assaults. You’ve been doing that for months now. Enough is enough. Goodbye and good riddance Phillip-Rosa.
You don't decide, pal! You are one vote out of many!
D E M O C R A C Y
FTW!
[removed]
The democracy has already spoken. Goodbye Phil-Rosa
19 votes & 8 endorses.That's clearly the majority 😉
>Proposes that the RC is required to be actively engaged in areas defined by the constitution
>Was originally an old part of the Constitution in 2011 for RC to lead by example
>Proposal gets passed that adds this new responsibility for RC w.r.t the party
>Is a bloody bureaucrat
You sling words at me as if I am Goliath, but you are no David for what you sling at me are shells. Your are pure rhetoric. Your best rebuttal is to attack my person, yet you condemn another for blatant ad-hominem. What you bring forth is absolutely nothing. This is my last comment to you on this.
I have quoted the CONSTITUTION of the SOCIALIST FREEDOM PARTY!
Is it so hard to understand??
MY PROPOSAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE RC!
YOUR NEWEST "BUREAUCRATIC NONSENSE" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!
WHERE DID I ATTACK YOU??
FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION, START THE PROCEDURE OF VOTING. ALL MEMBERS ARE ALLOWED TO VOTE. IF MY PROPOSAL PASSES WITH LESS THEN 3/4 OF THE PARTY SUPPORTING IT, THEN YOUR RC CAN OVERRULE IT.
IF IT PASSES WITH MORE THEN 3/4 (😵 THE RC CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!
STICK TO THE CONSTITUTION, STOP DERAILING THIS ISSUE!
SHOW SOME HONESTY!
“Where did I attack you?”
Surely that wasn't a serious question. Look back on all your texts for the last few months. The Democracy has spoken, the democracy has decided you’re vile and a stain upon this Party. Pack up your little show and go else where.
You would love to kick me out of the party, right? But game mechanics say otherwise. Learn to debate, stop trolling, SSalty!
You are worthless Phil.
So baseless Phillip.
Speaking of honesty, why did you grant yourself (Rosa) with citizenship using your Phil Harmony account? Such a prime example of dishonesty right from the start.
In didn't do anything, that infringes game-rules!
You can report me again & again (which you and your elite-circle of corrupt SFP leadership has already done!).
The only dishonest people are you!
And you are beginning to sound like a broken record, with all this slander, wild accusations & poor trolling.
Have a nice day.
❤
V+E
Voted
[removed]
Challenging, good luck
Looks great! Let's keep it up!
'anarcho-socialist political economy'
and how does that look?
That's an empty phrase, something the corrupt elite SFP leadership is good at!
Censorship in the party-feed is another of their "virtues", mixed with lies, slander & all other kind of nonsense!
I thought you were all for censorship?
No, I'm against hate-speech and fascist propaganda. Hope you understand the difference.