[Pres]Why we will not be wiping Malaysia any time soon...
•
by Parrington
I'm writing this in response to Relorian's article calling for us to take over Sarawak.
This government in no way supports an aggressive move on Sarawak at this current time.
This is why...
- If we were to wipe eMalay now, we'd have a security problem. Much as scottty is
capable an enjoys his job, I'm sure he wouldn't thank us for that burden placed upon him.
- Saying that eMalay needs to be taught a lesson is pure rubbish. We wiped them once, and the current problem is not the fault of the eMalay government. The perpetrator of the current problem is not even in the country at the moment. There is no reason, therefore, to wipe Sarawak.
-There is a reason that Malaysia have been holding off in the battles against PM. We have made an agreement with Malaysia not to attack Sarawak, and they have agreed the same regarding PM. This is an agreement based on trust and mutual understanding. To attack Sarawak now would completely undermine that relationship.
Wiping Malaysia is illogical, imperialist, and wrong.
As long as the agreement between our nations stand, there will be no aggressive attack on Malaysia.
I can report some very positive talks with TeMing, and hope to further those in our quest for peace and stability.
In other business...
Well done to Saneth Hill, who is doing an excellent job so far in implementing my domestic reforms. These reforms will hopefully provide a permanent boost to our population and activity rates.
You'll hear from me soon, I'm sure.
In the meantime, Stay Safe, Singapore!
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/slayer-249846/1
can i get subs please
Shit.
sound like you have a solid team working for you Parrington.
I hope your goodwill is not undone by individuals seeking self fame and agendas.
V+S
I am American Border Collie, and I support this plan.
voted
1. You already have a security problem. Too many congressional seats, not enough warm bodies to fill them. We could barely stop them we eSingapore only had 10 seats and often required massive amounts of people mailing the Admins to even secure those seats.
2. They are the ones who voted Yes on the NE law. When Fruit proposed it the 2nd time, they could have very well voted No. Instead they voted Yes and started up the war again. They made a clear choice, We should respond with a clear reply to their inability to press the No button. Its not revenge, its an answer to their idiocy.
3. Trust and Mutual Understanding... Yeah. Trust the same people who voted Yes for the lulz or because they are too incompetent to vote no.
4. Unending Gold Sinks. Do tell how you intend to keep funding Atra to continually bail out the battles. He's dedicated a lot of his own money to holding the line against an increasing amount of medal hunters. Plus there are the other tanks who have to be brought in to keep the battles from going south on us.
Honestly I get that you wanna play peacemaker and not be seen as a bad guy but sometimes you need the bad guy to finish something so totally that it will NOT start up again. You can keep trying to convince the people that its a "good" idea to keep the war going but all its going to take is one or two heavy hitters deciding they want the CH Medal and not just random BH medals to screw up all your plans and "Trust".
Stay safe Singapore
congress was chosen by Collinar, a member of Fruit's group as he was the only PP at that time + chinese new year so some congress member returned to hometown, no internet connection, thus allowing the NE proposal to past.
I voted no and asked every congress member to do so, but they voted yes after knowing Collinar will lose the CP election to screw eMY again.
Peace will be proposed once we are able to do so.
TeMing, honestly, now you have to hold up your hand & admit that you're congress are idiots. I've seen who is in congress, and frankly, they aren't entirely Fruit's guys.
But, we aren't attacking, anyway.
Relorian:
This isn't about Malaysia's congress. This is about an ongoing relationship between the populations of both our nations.
We have no intention of continuing the war any longer than it needs to.
You say we have a security problem. Possibly true. But are you proposing making it worse?
Relorian,
I'm sure you would agree that Parrington was given a horrible situation to start his presidency. I think that he is doing a great job given that situation.
He is making the best of what he is given. Considering the fact that they are waiting the full 24 hours between battles for the auto-attack to initiate the next stage proves that they are minimizing the impact of the war. Sure, it could have been three battles and done, but we need to keep in mind that Malaysia is once again a lulz victim here. Wiping them will just undo all the progress they have achieved since the last wipe. Budget-wise, I can't comment since I haven't been paying that much attention.
As for your point about the congress seats being a security problem, you are indeed correct! However, I think that Parrington's new outreach program for new players is a good response to that issue. I know it probably will not make an immediate impact on our current situation, but in the long run, it definitely will a positive effect.
Regardless of how you or I may feel about the situation, Relorian, the truth remains that Parrington was elected President. Give the kid a chance and see how he does. Singapore gave one to me, and look at the success I was able to achieve! Who can say that Parrington isn't capable of the same? Leave it to time and events to decide.
ABC