[DoF] Donation law proposal
T.A.X.S.I.R.A
Hello eAustralia
Your DoF is speaking
Sorry everyone for not using official paper but today i want to talk about a Donation Law...to Donate 60000 cc from treasury to RBA.
Now i am explaining the reasons of this proposal
At the end of day 3049 in the country treasury was a total of 123130.66 cc
All these money comes from tax income, known and unknown donations, 26000k cc donations from Orgs Rents.
About 10k cc will be given back to South Africa from RBA (calculated from beggining of term until the end of day 3049)
Also from 10 days remaining of this term we expect to take only as tax income another 30-35k cc
We also will sign/renew 3-5 MPP.
Now if we donate 60k cc to RBA in country treasury will remain 63130cc + 30-35kcc(10 days estimated tax)=about 95000 cc
now if we renew only 3 MPP at the end of the term we will close the balance with 65000cc (our opening balance was 57000 cc)
If we renew 3 and sing 2..we will close the balance at the end of term with 45000 cc+..
Feel free to give your opinion
REGARDS
YOUR MoF
T.A.X.S.I.R.A
Comments
Donating from the Treasury to RBA is always a no-brainer. It's very easy to transfer the money back in an instant if there are unexpected expenses.
I wonder also what other progress there has been in the DoF this term, such as currency or commodity trading, loans, the JDS, or asking our neighbours about any bonus regions we might be able to rent from them.
Short version as I am on the phone:
Currency = very profitable
Commodity = small profit
Loans = Paid back, some in full some as per plan
JDS = No uptakers
Region Rent = Waiting to hear back from two countries
Orgs = all paid, 1 extra rented out, another 1 or 2 being negotiated
Renting our regions = offer on the table, but will prob not go anything further
End of term = a marked improvement on the financial standing of eAustralia and a continuation of growth that has been seen across the previous terms.
Did one reply back with a no? As we have at least 3 neighbours, not that they all have surplus, but like eNZ might still be willing to rent to someone.
The countries approached are the ones that have excess regions to loan out and are more inclined to entertain that idea.
As you might of noticed New Zealand currently has Fish, in their sole region. Or are you saying we should approach them and try and get them to break their rental agreement with Chile?
Should that agreement lapse, it would be good to be next in line. Also, as I just mentioned. eNew Zealand has been willing to rent regions which are not surplus, are we sure that eSouth Africa and eIndonesia are not open to a similar thing given the right terms and price? Or perhaps we could trade eChile grain and fruit for the cattle and deer they hold in eNZ and throw in a sweetener of some sort for the inconvenience of changing things up.
It might be a no brainer gudz but remember the silly little trolls last month that said no to the transfer of your proposal. I wonder gudz if this term they will be back to vote no.
I also wondered gudz about the finance update on money/goods etc as it seemed very quiet almost hidden/secret/need to know basis. I am glad you have bought the subject up gudz as I am labelled as not wanting to participate in discussions
Notice gudz I have used your name quite often in the comment? This gudz is because I am directing the comment to yourself
Well I hope very much that there will be a report produced at the end of this term. Although some people expect detailed progress reports in a 24 hour window, I have a little more patience.