[CPF] School of Politiks
![Canada](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/Canada.png)
jbdivinus
![](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/3037755570_bfc0c0c972.jpg)
The Canadian Progressive Front has done it again. Alongside the Canadian Empire Party, joint operations led to 20 secured seats; that is 50% of congress. Every single candidate the CPF decided to run outside the Q5 regions won by a margin of 4+ votes. The only exception was Nova Scotia, where NARC had unexpected problems throughout the day, and they did not get a seat under the CPF banner.
The CPF had more votes than any other party. Despite being less than half the size of the DAL, we had 30 more votes. We're about the same size as the UN, but had over 100 more votes than them...
The CPF was the only party to elect more than 20% (1/5, the average for top5 parties) of the congressmen.
It is a fact that this has been of the most successful elections in Canadian history for any party.
How do we do it?
![](http://www.umc.org/atf/cf/%7BDB6A45E4-C446-4248-82C8-E131B6424741%7D/YouAreInvited.jpg)
My entire career right now in eCanada is based on improving our political system. On giving it some new life. Over the next few weeks the CPF will be announcing the launch of several unique and innovative schemes, applying and learning techniques to improve and revolutionize the meaning of a party in eCanada.
So I invite the DAL, the UN, and EPIC to come to the CPF forums and ask the CPF about the Strategic Voting Team techniques. We will be happy to share and discuss with all parties how we do things, learn how they do things, and discuss methods of improvement. Politically we may be opponents, but I believe in a system where we can learn from each other. My offer is open to all parties, all they need to do is send someone who runs their strategic voting team to the CPF forums.
![](http://netgautam.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/Igotafan_1159C/ThankYou.jpg)
For the parties that take me up on this offer, thank you for recognizing that we can learn from each other. The CPF has great techniques but it is our team that makes us so successful. Helping fellow Canadians by leading by example...that is what the CPF is all about.
If you are just a regular citizen, trying to get along in the game, why don't you check out the CPF forums? Even if you aren't a party member, you will be able to get access to several relevant discussions, and participate in them. If you need mentorship, are looking for advice, or want to get involved in the game, in politics, business, foreign affairs, the military, journalism, or anything else, the CPF can help you find your niche.
Its a pleasure Canada,
Jbdivinus
Comments
erst
A+, would strategically vote again.
Voted for Great Justice \o/
This article seems over-arrogant to me.
Congratulations for your success.
Can you confidently say that now we can get stuff done?
Fox Blutch,
There is a difference between arrogance and the truth. Our parties differ in size by 20 members. We elected twice the number of members to congress as you did. We had over 100 more voters than you did.
I am not trying to be antagonistic by saying that...The CPF has a formula for success, we have proved that time and time again. I am offering a unique chance at being able to learn from that...
you can see it as arrogance, or you can see that the CPF does in fact have valuable information that your party could benefit from, and come to our forums to learn from us and work with us...no one is forcing you to do anything.
SVU will always equal arrogance Fox Blutch
v
I take personal responsibility for the NS fail, and apologize to my party and yours for the mix ups
No...I see this as arrogance. The article is a thinly veiled knife.
For those who want to know how the SVU works, PM me, I will tell you all about it less the Arrogance and Pompousness.
I call it Diet COLA!
Call it what you want, its results.
arrogant article is arrogant. jb's just trying to make his ego look presentable.
anyway jb, i believe your goal was 25 people anyway, and you got 20. seems like you fell short my friend. how disappointing.
anyway i hope the 20 seats were worth it, because you certainly sacrificed a lot to get them. enjoy.
Congrats to the CPF and CEP - I don't think this really crosses the line into arrogance - they said they'd do it, they did it and they're letting you know they did it - humble politicians tend to get overlooked and forgotten - even Don Cherry tolerates a bit of fist pumping for a great goal so long as a guy doesn't get too carried away
OK maybe some of the number comparisons and "we'll teach you how" is a bit over the top, but the DAL sour grapes sounds worse
Your article is factually inaccurate. You have failed to eclipse the accomplishment of the CNC party during it's first month, when it achieved 19 seats by itself. You acquired 15 for the CPF, 5 for CEP.
Goran Thrax
Goran, I said "one of the".
Leto, people in pimped-out SUV's tend to be arrogant.
Congrats CPF and all those who said "I don't know who to vote for."
Blutch and Scorp call jb arrogant. Hah!
(aplausse)
meh
Bon travail au CPF, l'Union Nationale a tres bien organise son vote, mais l'enigme demeure la tres haute participation du CPF etant donne la grosseur de leur membership!
Et a rajouter, on a jamais vu un aussi gros taux de participation pour un parti du top 5 (et le changement est marque). Est-ce que par hasard le CPF aurait achete des votes?
"Blutch and Scorp call jb arrogant. Hah!"
Atoms trolling? Hah! Never saw that before.
Proactive socio-political commentary from only atoms...priceless
Name calling to deflect attention away from reality ala Blutch...useless.
[removed]
"Proactive socio-political commentary from only atoms...priceless
As priceless as seeing a troll attacking Dade rather than 1ronman. People must be tired of hearing you using vuvuzelas in Congress.
Dade has the potential to do way more damage than 1ronman ever did (and atoned for).
Please don't think of or mention my vuvuzela again. It makes me feel all icky.
Props @ CPF
@ only atoms:
You must submit to the will of the vuvuzela. BZZZZZZZZ
@ This article:
While it seems to be written from the point of view from the "upper crust," it doesn't ever state one party is better than any other.