[Banach]~~The Future of Canadian Politics~~
Day 1,167, 19:16
•
Published in Canada 
•
by
•
by Banach
I'll make this announcement short and sweet. (It was longer but eRepublik timed out and lost all my work.)
I've been prompted to run for leadership of the ailing Canadian Progressive Front.
I bring experience, dedication and ambition along with me for the ride.
If elected on the 15th, I'll work diligently to make this party the envy of the political landscape...just like the old Norsefire and the old Canadian Progressive Front before their eventual decline.
I would rename the party to
National Progress Coalition
National - It would be a party to serve the best interest of a strong, unified, orderly, stable Canadian state. It would serve the French and English-speaking communities that make up the country with equal opportunity.
Progress - The key goal in any platform from the party would be to simplify the government, strengthen the military, eliminate wasteful bureaucracy, expenditures, portfolios and impractical nuances as well as make Canada an attractive state for foreign investment, immigration and diplomacy.
Coalition - I would hope to make this party as accessible to people of different backgrounds, experiences, and aspirations in order to truly make a pragmatic organization. I would hope to avoid the Weimar-esque political situation we are presently faced with and make this new party a rallying ground for many different views and pull into it various current parties. I strongly believe that a 2-4 party state is optimal for Canada's growth right now
Anyways, that's my pitch.
Take it or leave it,
Either way, see you at the Canadian Progressive Front and on February 15th.
Cheers,
Banach
~~
~
I've been prompted to run for leadership of the ailing Canadian Progressive Front.
I bring experience, dedication and ambition along with me for the ride.
If elected on the 15th, I'll work diligently to make this party the envy of the political landscape...just like the old Norsefire and the old Canadian Progressive Front before their eventual decline.
I would rename the party to
National Progress Coalition
National - It would be a party to serve the best interest of a strong, unified, orderly, stable Canadian state. It would serve the French and English-speaking communities that make up the country with equal opportunity.
Progress - The key goal in any platform from the party would be to simplify the government, strengthen the military, eliminate wasteful bureaucracy, expenditures, portfolios and impractical nuances as well as make Canada an attractive state for foreign investment, immigration and diplomacy.
Coalition - I would hope to make this party as accessible to people of different backgrounds, experiences, and aspirations in order to truly make a pragmatic organization. I would hope to avoid the Weimar-esque political situation we are presently faced with and make this new party a rallying ground for many different views and pull into it various current parties. I strongly believe that a 2-4 party state is optimal for Canada's growth right now
Anyways, that's my pitch.
Take it or leave it,
Either way, see you at the Canadian Progressive Front and on February 15th.
Cheers,
Banach
~~
~
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Good luck. You'll need it either way. The CPF isn't even a shadow of what it once was anything you can do with it would be a step in the right direction.
I don't think any party can compare to what the CPF was with me and TFD running show.
Hope it works out for you.
I'll see how involved in politics I'll get... It's never really been too impactful to me.
Best of luck!
Cheers, you should get involved, its an integral part of eRep.
Without its this website is boring!
NPC = Non-Playing Character?
Save your time and come join the things were doing in MDP.
Is your response to the thieves in eCanada still "Whatever", or do you stand with the rest of eCanada against them?
[removed]
It was a legitimate question Banach. Some of us in the CPF will want to know the answer. 😉
I'll ask again.
Is your response to the thieves in eCanada still "Whatever", or do you stand with the rest of eCanada against them?
Join CHAOS
>It was a legitimate question Banach. Some of us in the CPF will want to know the answer.
oh, so you're back in the CPF again, Alias? Right now I have you tied with Patar333 for most times in and out. Here's an idea: why don't you pick a party instead of jumping to which ever party is going to benefit you most in the short run. Let's face it, you only re-joined at the request of Addy so that you could keep me from becoming PP in case something happened.
then went and joined the UN (in other words, you used them for your own personal benefit in the short run) now you are claiming to be CPF again, huh?
Come to think of it, you don't have much of a position to be questioning Banach here, seeing as he did way more for the CPF in one day than you did in all of your days in the party. Can you tell me one important and substantial thing you did for the party in the short time you've actually been a member? Because I can't seem to remember a whole lot that you did for us.
Good-luck
Good luck Banach, a renaissance is in order.
@Pimp
You can't remember a whole lot that Alias did for us? You include yourself as a member of the CPF? What a laugh.
Alias was indeed an insurance policy against you, and even if that is the only thing Alias is remembered for in the CPF it is worth it.
Hahahahaha Banach's comment was golden.
Don't be trollin' my article.
Thanks for the good wishes.
I'll ask again, for the 3rd time.
Is your response to the thieves in eCanada still "Whatever", or do you stand with the rest of eCanada against them?
Saltydog is such a badass. When I grow up, I want to be just like him.
oh gawd, salty asked you three times, you know what you gotta do don't you?
http://tiny.cc/8rqe8
RainerN, that link puzzled me. Did you mean this one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX6pPfgLjvI
If Banach is not willing to answer such a simple, straightforward question on his approach to thieves who have stolen so much from our country, how can we expect him to deal with them when he's in office?
We need leaders, not avoiders.
i think i did plugson, get out of my mind!!!!! xD
saltydog, are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
Banach has potential. Take it easy on him.
we could tie him up and throw him in water to see if he floats or sinks.
problem solved?
...or we could just ask him straightforward, no-BS questions on his approach to current affairs, given that he's running for a leadership position.
I must be crazy!
>the question
>you
Stop avoiding it.
Trick question, don't answer it.
You have too much time to lose.
OMG, Banach comes back! 😮
Wb 🙂
I saw Banach answer it in his shout. Does that count?
^
Considering this is his political platform, no. It's not hard to answer a question asked 3 times in a row.
It begs the further question - why won't he address the issue?
Why does he label anyone who challenges him on it a "troll"?
@Addy
Great plan. It worked, and you ended up destroying the CPF with your utter incompetence.
Bravo, son
i also saw his shout, and there is nothing in here about Supporting thieves...
and if he was really going to scam us, wouldn't he just say that he doesn't support thieves? or maybe he wouldn't say anything?
hard to trust anyone these days.
I don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thievesI don't support thieves
What what?
I think Banach supports thieves.
only a thief would say he doesn't support thieves THAT many times.
burn him with fire?
Is Banach a girl?
Was that so hard Banach?
oh dear....
Not excited about a party name change. The party's name to me is TFD's legacy in this game. Just seems important to me to keep it in his memory.
controversy!
Wilhelm - Second thoughts?
Exalted - That's fair. Remember TFD through your actions and thoughts as I'm sure he'd like you to. A name is just a name, an idea is forever.
Wb