[SUFFER] Congressional Candidates, ATO, and Legitimacy
DMV3
Congressional Candidates
Nyx Lynx
DMV3
dscape chaos
FuzzyMunkey
Bruck
An Slaugh
crisfire
Foxfire
Darkmos
ATO
There was a bit of drama this week regarding keeping a known terrorist party in the Top Five. A few Top Five Party Presidents were discussing what to do with Prince Sheogorath's former PTO party and it was decided that to keep them in the Top Five was too dangerous for eCanadian security. Myself and XanderKross approached thedillpickl about dismantling the party to encourage the undesirable elements of the party to disperse or leave Canada all together.
At first thedillpickl disagreed with the plan, but after further discussion decided it was best if the party was forced out of the Top Five. The results of the conversation have cause a couple of known malcontents and trolls to accuse Xander and myself of being power hungry and corrupt. As Eternal Leader of the eCanadian Reich, I have to say these accusations are without merit and that eCanada was best served by forcing known PTO threats out of the Top Five. The party, not Dill, lacked the legitimacy needed to be a productive member of the Top Five.
Legitimacy is something that is earned through respect, hard work, and dedication to eCanada. The vast majority of the party in question lack even the basic semblance of legitimacy. SUFFER on the other hand has many active members that are dedicated to preserving the eCanadian Reich and helping eCanada become the world power it deserves to be.
Long Live the eCanadian Reich!
DMV3
Eternal Leader of the eCanadian Reich
Comments
88
\o
\o/
We All Suffer
These things can usually best be solved in a giant tub of cream corn.
Go on...
We all suffer
Let's be clear. You needed Dill to dissolve so that Suffer could be top 5.
I don't think anyone has a problem with that. Just be honest. This isn't about dismantling a party, its about dismantling eCanada.
I think I'm ok with all the anarchy you can create. Its good for business. 🙂
I already control all of Canada. What would I need with one Top Five Party over another? Muwahahahahaha!
well played.
Power-hungry and corrupt are among the first words I would use to describe you. That being said, if that was all the Shaved Beaver situation was about, I would have been perfectly content to keep your power-hungry, corrupt ass out of the top 5.
As it happens, I am concerned about keeping a dangerous element from gaining political power and causing harm to eCanada, as they had done in the past. It is thus necessary to keep that element out of a position where they have the potential to cause such harm.
I never claimed I wasn't, but the situation was definitely about security and not power.
We could of filled the congress list for the Shaved Beaver with loyal outstanding citizens. I know plenty of people around here that like Shaved Beaver unlike yourself who rejects the Beaver all together.
It wouldn't matter, there would be at least 20 plus PTOers concentrated in a single Top Five party.
They left UF in the same circumstance, they would leave the Beaver as well. This would of been a replay of what happened last time.
False, they left UF because they had a leader. Without someone to follow they would have probably stayed around until they figured out a way to take control themselves.
"A few Top Five Party Presidents"
Who? Why not all?
DMV wasn't a top five PP at the time was he?
If Quentin was part of the discussion I'm a bit dissapointé to not have been included.... actually, I'm sorta thinking maybe the discussion was with two PP and Denis?
Also a bit confused about this part (concatenated, sorta): The party,...... lacked ... legitimacy .......Legitimacy is something that is earned through respect, hard work, and dedication.... *looks like a tie to me*
Heck, maybe take the sufferers and put them into the Beavers and all would have been well. But then, I am not a PP, or Denis 🙂
I know legitimacy comes from recognition. Attaching one's values to the definition of it is very telling.
I started to post a reprint of the tread you started with Xander and me. I won't do that out of respect for Xander. I won't stoop to your level and harm someone I consider a friend even though I believe he's chosen the wrong person to back. Mark my words Dennis, this little play you've made will be remembered. I backed down because I don't wish to cause any harm to Canada and don't feel the ensuing shitstorm would have benefited anyone in the long run.
Talk nice now, let me make myself appear to be the bad guy because you know that I can't keep my mouth shut. Love how you slammed DWB for his article, put some distance in there real quick like. Next time I'd appreciate it if you'd come at me directly and not use others to spit the words you won't say.
I will also mention that SGTRock is not to be involved in this. We've spoken and I assured him that I did not believe that he was anymore than a trusted person for the position he was asked to fill.
Twist away at my words now. Practice you doe eyes and your silky smooth speech.
Damn auto spell check...
THREAD!
SGTRock is a fine soldier doing an unpleasant job he was asked to do. No doubt he will come under fire from certain individuals for his current role. If his attackers want to take issue with his presence there, they can address their concerns to me directly, because I'm the one who asked him to step in.
For the record, I have no pressing concern about the PM thread going public. It started out rather curt and abrupt, which is an approach I believe I am somewhat known for, and I came in with some flawed information and presented it poorly.
It did seem as though you were gathering Pickle's Patriots into the party, but after reviewing PM threads and media articles, that "gathering" was not as direct as I had believed it to be. In truth, you had put out an "open call" to join your party with the hilarious name, and a number of Pickles responded to it of their own volition.
Other than that, I stand by the statements I made in it, and do not believe that having them go public will do much to damage my reputation. I'd rather it not come to that - it was, after all, not an open-door discussion - but I have nothing to hide.
Agreed about SGTRock, that is why I mention him so there is no misunderstanding. Anyone saying saying otherwise is totally off base.
I still don't have a good enough reason to post anything that was said. I appreciate your explanation though. You are correct, there was no coercion on my part. People (not all of them pickles) joined the party of their own volition. I ran the numbers and (as I explained in the PM) still believe that the situation was contained. Also as several have pointed out recently, DMV did the same thing with United Front when he made it the SUFFER party.
That is neither here nor there. We've talked, we understand each others position on this matter. Not to do him any favour but I do think that DWB was thrown under the bus by Dennis. In any case, I'm looking squarely at DMV3.
Where exactly did I slam DWB for his article? I didn't throw anyone under a bus.
" Myself and XanderKross"
wut, wut has this world come to...
I've been asking myself that same question.
It's not our fault we have more sense than everyone else. We don't have to loke each other, but we know how to get sh** done.
Does anyone in this eWorld REALLY "loke" each other? Like...for real?
I loke IBB very much!
I loke all of you. When I read this article I was moved to tears, and the loke just flowed from every one of my orifices. The sacrifices you are all making for this mighty nation is beyond loke.
In the end, all you need is loke.
Loke, loke, loke.
Oh, and a credit card.
go home dictaturd