L'Etat, c'est moi
CatBea
ladies ‘n gents
L'Etat, c'est moi is a sentence that is associated to Louis XIV of France (le Roi-Soleil) reign
it represents a form of governance so called “absolute monarchical rule” it is by far the inspiration of modern Dictatorship.
under a Dictatorship there is a single man that considers himself :
- above all others
- owner of the true and only path for his country
- disregard of citizens opinions
under a Dictatorship you lose Congress, as a consequence you lost completely control your country destiny:
- no control over budget
- no control over foreign policies
- no control on who you will make war
- no control on whom is ally
ALL this become a ONE MAN decision, the DICTATOR
under Dictatorship you become no more than a sheep, therefore unless you feel comfortable as a sheep you must fight to overthrow a Dictator;
And the most obnoxious rhetoric is when the Dictator pretends to be the state, and therefore fighting the Dictator would be fighting the state.
NO you will not fight your country YOU WILL FIGHT The ONE who steal your eCountry from you
so when time comes you will have to decide to either:
live as a sheep or as a full rights and liberties eCitizen
Comments
Voted.
I hope eCanadians wake up and see the path Rylde is taking you
Rylde and Free!? No, Sheep or Free!
google it
25 Abril 1974 Portugal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha-h5bPSxQE
Big Vote 🙂
good
Only sheep need a shepherad. Live Free!
http://tinyurl.com/p6mrhgw
make klopie alive : (((
Voted
v
o7
voted
Not sure what business of yours what the politics of my country are to you as long as we stand true to our shared allies and friends.
Im not taxing my people to death or stealing from them. I also haven't made war or broken ties with Canada's allies.
Were dropping MPPs so an air strike becomes cheaper.
Kindly mind your own business as my coup was made possible by citizens of my country who supported me.
I dont know how many your supporters are, due to the legal election result. But I do know the number of eCan citizens asking MEK to free eCan from a vicious dictatorship.
Many support me as well so its an internal struggle and quite frankly none of your business.
In the future when im elected democratically i will consider you enemies of my country and re-consider our relationship with our so called allies.
"...Not sure what business of yours what the politics of my country ..."
My business is towards Freedom of Speech, i don't like Dictatorship nor Dictators, regardless their names, could be Mr.XPTO, Mr. X, or Mr. Rylde, it's the Ideology that is wrong
"...Im not taxing my people to death or stealing from them..."
you took from them something far more important, their Congress, and the freedom to be the People, represented by the congress, to decide upon Taxes, MPP, Allies...
"... my coup was made possible by citizens of my country who supported me...."
indeed you had support, nevertheless that doesn't make it right, when a group of few takes what belongs to an entire Community / eCountry....
Just consider the whole picture with your actions moving forward as helping one side makes enemies of others in a sticky situation.
Probably why an international military unit should stay out of nations internal politics. Especially when it represents members of our allies.
You not a member of our community so you can express your opinion and it should go no farther then that.
"... your actions moving forward as helping one side makes enemies of others in a sticky situation..."
see Rylde, that's the point, as far as i'm concerned there are not two sides, since for me Dictatorship is not at all acceptable
"Probably why an international military unit should stay out of nations internal politics. Especially when it represents members of our allies."
I publish an Article in ePortugal stating the very same point of view, i guess that demonstrates that I don't like Dictatorships anywhere.
"You not a member of our community so you can express your opinion and it should go no farther then that"
Democracy Vs. Dictatorship it's hardly an internal affair of any Community it's rather an international issue where we all can and ought have an opinion
Have an opinion but the moment you take up arms in a conflict that is not your own you become an enemy in my eyes and as representatives of allied nations ill have us reconsider our allies.
well it's fair enough that you might have to reconsider MPP policies as well as Allies i believe you might being referring ePortugal
however if you want to evaluate the kind of impact that might have on MEK decisions, you could ask m60a3tts and Poggo, both eSpanish, and they will tell you how much influence ePortugal has over MEK...🙂
so basically you made your point i made my point, so let's move on
good game to you...
I know they dont control you. I just know what to tell them in the event it happens.
As a victim of your bully attitude, it is my business. Actually, now YOU are my business.
But I am happy to shout to all eCan allies that you will reconsider your relationship... good to know!
Your the one threatening to make war on a large chunk of our population. They will see you as an enemy. MEK is all from so called allied nations of canada. So what do you suggest our course of action should be.?
Its why as a rule of thumb you stay oit of other nations politics.
Canada politics is not my business, as you are not Canada.
YOU are the one that started everything, due to your deviant behavior.
YOU are the one who sent me injurious PM*s, YOU started a hostile Civil War with public money, so YOU are the one to blame.
Maybe other people are used to deal with a mad dog by stepping back, but I will not step back from your bully attitude.
Started it with my money and backed by the strongest members of our community.
This is an internal matter and as an ally of our nation none of your business.
Your MOM'S money.. let's get this straight, slob.
Freedooooooooooom!
under a Dictatorship you lose Congress, as a consequence you lost completely control your country destiny:
- no control over budget
- no control over foreign policies
- no control on who you will make war
- no control on whom is ally
Hate to break it to you but even with a congress the average citizen had no say in anything. We have a couple of people pouting because they got kicked out of the sandbox, and one of them well deserved for almost collapsing the Canadian economy.
What speaks volumes is most Canadians didn't even fight against the dicatatorship war. I don't think my MU even participated so take the for what it is worth.
even though there is lack of activity or an higher level of abstention, that is a prerogative of any congressman, it might even been consider a political statement
what is totally wrong is when someone takes away your freedom to decide, either to vote or not vote, make a proposal or not
keeping to himself and only, ALL Decisions...
Save the false flagwaving for the opressed. 45 countries under dictatorship and you chose Canada to take pity on? Too funny. Either a PTO or DMV is paying you off. Or both.
thx for the tacit acceptance...
as for...
"... Save the false flagwaving for the opressed. 45 countries under dictatorship and you chose Canada to take pity on? Too funny. Either a PTO or DMV is paying you off. Or both..."
since it is a statement i believe it's not open to argue, i can only say that we MEK can be hire the same way Mr. Rylde did it so often in the past
I never hired MEK your thinking of klop get your facts straight.
There was no tacit acceptance. Because really eCanadian freedom from dictatorhip means nothing to you, just getting paid. Wrapping yourself in the flag? lol. Just say you are in it for the money and at least be honest about it.
No one is paying MEK to fight for Canada in our revolution. There is no need to pay friends in your time of need.
Dennis you don't have friends. You just have people you prey on and take advantage of before they see you for what you truly are.
Really thinking about this, dictatorship really just means rule by the strongest military unit.
MEK is much stronger than Cordis Die.
I look forward to MEK overthrowing Cordis Die and putting gu480, our True Legend, in as the new dictator.
Geez how is this even any business of yours? Butthurt..... people are butthurt
Hail MEK!
Hail Asteria!
Hail true allies!
Fail Rylde the retard!
Can you please find another term to use other than retard? This is highly offensive and I am done asking and am going to start clicking on report. Call him an idiot or asinine, deranged, dim-witted, dull, fatuous, feeble-minded, idiotic, imbecilic, inane, moronic, simple-mind, or witless instead. Expand your vocabulary or continue to prove you are talking about yourself.
Rylde the retard has a nice ring to it though.
Many of the terms you listed were formerly used as synonyms for the kind of people that were formerly referred to as retarded. If you are offended by people using the term retarded then you should also be offended by the use of those terms as well.
so does DMV the Dickwad and McVicker the Prickler but at least by using them I'm not offending the entire Mentally Disabled population like a moron.
Thanks for telling me what should and shouldn't offend me or others. Used to be that when a friend would act silly or stupid I might have told them to not be so gay or quit being a fag, but that isn't acceptable anymore either. I was probably as immature or ignorant back then as anyone who thinks calling someone retard is acceptable today.
As a gay man I have no problem with people using gay or fag in that manner. They're words, the only have power of you give them power. No sense in being uptight about a word.
I am not going to bring it up again. I am not personally offended by any word, but I do think it is insensitive to use words like that. I also think we all have something in common; we are the idiots still playing games like this on the internet. I get disliking how someone plays or circumstances you may find yourself within the game, but I never understand becoming so angry with anyone in a game that you have to resort to petty insults.
[removed]
"Thanks for telling me what should and shouldn't offend me or others. "
Is this a sarcastic comment or are you being serious?
It was a serious comment. I didn't tell YOU that you should be offended by the word retard or any other words. You tried to tell me because I found a word offensive (actually insensitive, as I explained in greater detail), that I should be offended by other words. You are obviously not that bright and should quit pretending otherwise.
Ok, see now I'm even more confused. If you were serious then this suggests that you're being grateful but obviously by your insult, you're not.
You're contradicting yourself all over the place, TBRaiders. First, you certainly did suggest that we should be insulted by the word retard. "This is a highly offensive," you wrote. There really is no other way to interpret this statement. If you had qualified this by saying that some people find the term highly offensive, that would have been another matter. You spoke in absolute terms.
You continued by listing other terms that you think are no longer acceptable to use to refer to homosexuals (even as one pointed out that he thinks they are acceptable) - unacceptable, offensive, and insensitive all essentially being synonyms in this discussion. Why is it acceptable for you to suggest that it is wrong to use these terms but you take issue when I pointed out that the list you gave contained other offensive terms as well?
You used an interesting term to describe yourself in your youth: ignorant. It seems that you're trying to spread awareness of how insensitive the term retard is. I have no problem with this. Likewise I was trying to make you aware that other terms were similarly offensive. In other words, I believe that you're still ignorant. That is not meant to be an insult, only a statement of facts on this particular issue.
Basically, I take umbrage with you deciding - again, in absolute terms - what terms are offensive/insensitive/acceptable and which are not. I did not say which terms are offensive, only pointing out that some terms are very similar in nature and should be seen as such: if you are to take offence by any you should take offence by all. I have yet to see why this shouldn't be the case.
It's like you had said that the term queer is insensitive and that we should use the terms fairy, pansy, and flamer instead. Why some and not all? And why are you the one to decide?
Chochi have I ever told you how much I love you?
Chochi, I am going to excuse your mistake in thinking this conversation started in this article. I had previously asked dmv in two different posts if he could not use that word because I found it offensive. I continued it in this article and can see how it appears as though I came riding in on my white horse in this article. I should have dropped it after asking him the first time. We've all seen much worse on the internet and I certainly have the option of just ignoring him. Sorry for my last post. I took an unnecessary jab, which was undeserved.