Mpps going wrong
Day 1,764, 02:04
•
Published in South Africa 
•
by
•
by kuckuck
During last week, I fought following orders in this battles:
Brazil - Portugal
Poland - France
Spain - Colombia
Always for the countries on the right side of the list.
But when I moved to one of eSA's rented regions (Brazil), I had the option to fight in the same battles, but for the countries on the left side of the list.
Is this neutral? This is nonsense.
Our next MPP could be Canada so we can fight against USA.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
VOTED
masonexxx
V & S
\/
V & S
Brozil is in CTRL. We're proEDEN. End of discussion.
it is normal when you move to another country that they have different MPP's, Nothing to do about neutrality, more about independence. I am glad we are diversifying our MPP's , about time we sign MPP's with nations not aligned with our biggest ally / biggest threat.
V + S
Since when Brasil is neutral?
eSA tries to be neutral, but in this game unless we where a fiscal paradise, no way of being neutral 😉
Brazil and US have been the ones who have helped (PTO times are so far away than are like forgotten) and having our political independence is different from Mpp all their enemies. That is loosing the sense of place for eSA.
I realise now we already have an MPP with eCan and none with US
Great
We only miss one with eNZ to be nicely neutral to eAus
V
You can move to the SA and fight for OUR allies. If you'd like to fight for Brazil and her allies, then you can go and live there.
That's what I am complaining about, that if I fight from eSA I'm fighting against our real allies, the ones that have proved loyalty over years. Not having clear which are our allies is really a lost of direction
"We're proEDEN"
I'm pro my fact allies, don't matter if they play in CTRL baseball league or in EDEN senior golf course.
"End of discussion."
lol
Poland and Spain, are those our allies which proven loyalty?
Brazil and USA are they
Vee won CP elections with 45% while Loco, the main opposition took 38% this to me show a shift (from a majority of 63% to a win without a majority), this shift is reflected in our MPP's. MPP's not necessarily aligned with our main ally.
See it as the winds of change, just like eBR signing MPP with Poland, one definitely do not only sign MPP's with countries you might have received help from.....loyalty between nations is relative and change as quick as it suits the country.
loyalty with far away nations has relative consequences, neighbour politics is very different.
The CP elections had some factors, but the congress that has approved the mpps is still the same or even more IA coloured. Is not a political thing when I was the only one that voted against some of that mpps.
Illuminated or crazy, time to return to my cave.
Agur
07
Hehe, all of your points are very valid. Yet when I came in, I looked at our list of allies, our MPPs. I noticed something.
7/8 of our MPPs all had MPPs with Portugal
Colombia was already an MPP
7/8 shared with France
So, in reality we are still fighting with our Allies, 7 of our 8 friends (thats 87.5😵 all like Portugal. We would be alienated from those seven, (87 if we choose to allign with Spain.
Same with France
Colombia we were just renewing.
Also, Canada is not about to be invaded by USA. That war was the result of two madmen, bribery, and corrupt congressmen. Simply put, it resulted in 3 impeachment attempts in the US Government, and indirectly lead to the impeachment of Glove the next month
Says the guy fighting against Brazil in RWs.
Portugal is an old ally. We have no need to desert them simply because Brazil has a crush on Spain. Same goes for Colombia, Uruguay and Australia.
Neutral means we get to choose allies as we feel based upon criteria that only have to make sense to us. Enjoy it and the ability to fight for almost any side by moving 1-2 zones.
lol Miyagi, right
It was a campaign Brazil won 80 to 0
READ THIS: Congressional changes released by Admins:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/erep-admins-release-congressional-changes-read-them-here--2123517/1/20