Parties and Policies - A Summary
chaznoodles
Hello, once again. Today, after a week or so of contacting parties and attempting to gather together party policies and the like, this article can finally be released. This article intends to outline the differences between parties in their policies and outlook, as well as getting general opinions on said parties. The aim of this is to provide an easier choice for new players in choosing a party instead of picking those with the most members, and provide a detailed summary of the differences between parties for those with more experience.
First to respond to contact was Lord Halifax, the Spokesman for the Great British Democratic Party. Being a lesser-known party, they have not been involved in the conflicts that have occurred between the main parties. His words are here:
The full summary and article link is here: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/fortress-of-democracy--2386524/1/20
The GBDP appears to be a small party, a good start for beginners who wish to gain political experienc without being lost within too many members.
Next, we have the People's Communist Party, or the PCP. Currently, the PCP seems to be in the middle of a trolling spree, as is seen in their party description, and the policy sent to me by one Mwcerberus:
When asked for his opinion on the party, Mwc state
😛
"Well currently we lack something something that would push us into 1st position ... and thing is simple.... sammy setting up 150 more multi accounts"
Third on the list is the Worker's Rights Party, currently working under Huey George. The WRP seems to have very bold ideas about the managing of our country, and appears to communicate well.
The WRP is further explained here:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-wrp-forward-wrp--2393012/1/20
A reformed New Era is next, with the spokesman, Michael Ludgate, giving an excellent summary of what the party wants for the nation:
Opposed to the use of propaganda? That's very good, in our current situation.
A useful article from Angela Williams on NEw Era is located here:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/my-vision-for-new-era--2403791/1/20
Finally on the list, we The Real Spamicans, the true leaders of our nation. When asked about Spamican policy, Prof. J Moriarty said this:
Full support, 10/10 would vote.
Earlier today, Hollenboer, the spokesman of Vendetta, provided an outline as to what Vendetta stand for without prompt! Hats off to Hollen for being forward-thinking!
Alongside this, we also got another mail from a member of the party, Luke A, who thoughtfully gave a more detailed approach to what Vendetta's policies are!
On the note of other parties, The UKRP stated they they were putting something together, then never replied.
The Unity Party is going through a change of their policy, and so politely declined to provide policy due to this.
The UKPP/ESO were contacted, but no response was given.
A final note. When asked for an opinion, Mr Woldy provided these very wise words on choosing a political party:
"My advise is very general, and is simply that to anyone looking for a party; check out their wiki, speak to their PP and members, and see which one seems best in sync with your interests and opinions. And not to just go with the guys who offer you the most guns - that's what your MU is for \o/"
Good words to follow.
Don't forget to subscribe!
Comments
Vendetta doesnt really have any rubber stamped policies. Its funny I mention this today that with some urgency we need to set out our core aims.
"what policys?" sounds like a motto...
Also, weren't you saying that you already have lots and lots of policies*? I guess that was incorrect considering that I understand that you're just trying to figure them out...
I'd be happy to edit them in, if you decide on some before this article disappears.
We do have one, if I can recall, down with TUP?
My only issue is with the way you have made winston look.
Also for an "unbiased" opinion you then ask a PTO in Woldy. Someone you know attacked our party...
Come on
Winston looks the way he does in that screenshot due to what he said. He wasn't set up and framed and shown out of context.
I asked Woldy for an opinion, just the same as I asked everyone else whom I asked for their party policy if they gave me one. Woldy gave an extremely good quotation for new players, so I featured it.
my opinion was clearly steeped in bias, asking people to exercise free will and think about what party to join is evidently the words of a madman blinded by political ambition
You may call me V wrote 32 minutes ago
Vendetta polices http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/vendetta-039-power-to-the-people-quot-policies-2406917/1/20
It's a shame you didn't give me that link beforehand. Then you would've had it placed in the article, rather than having to use another article to advertise.
Vendetta can use New Era's old policies voted in by the members of New Era/Vendetta.
The "new" New Era should really be using these too.
http://wiki.erepublik.com/index.php/New-Era (I may change the location of the page soon if the link breaks).
More TUP propaganda, you don't even fight!
I have no need to fight against unfounded accusations which aren't true, and frankly, I won't. You're allowed to think what you want to think, although I would be thankful if you wouldn't plaster your slander over me, thanks.
lol'd... How is an article in which TUP was barely stated their propaganda?
2009 player and level 25.... it says it all...no more comments
I assume he left and came back like me Alpha. I'm also a 2010 account being level 29. I came back as 23.
Vendetta really knows how to shoot themselves in the foot.
You mean like running multis accounts WEAK effort from Ragnell mark 2
I was talking about Vendetta, not TUP.
Shooting themselves in the foot as in using a chance to come across as a fair and constructive party and uses it to call the publisher a multi.
That's because the ability to think before opening ones mouth/typing the first thing that came into their head escapes them, and we all know that to disagree and question the all knowing, all seeing leadership of New NE must mean that you are either:-a) A troll b) A multi or c) A TUP plant because free thought doesn't exist in their world until they tell you that you're allowed to have one but it must be what ever they're spouting at the moment
Sorry who are you? You have made no contribution to the Uk in five years, only last week you produced your first article to say I don't trust you is a complete. Understatement.
like I Said who are you?
I'm the guy that decided, hey, let's write an unbiased news report so everyone gets a clear view of what goes on, without any bias.
You the guy who is trying to con the uk public, no one believe you 2009 account level 25 no egov record, BORING!
Personally, I'd be more inclined to believe the player who is putting out articles intended to assist the public, than one of the people who appear to have trouble talking in coherent sentences. Now, please stop flaming the article.
If you would have asked on certain policies i would have told you that why i said what policy's i didn't say we don't have none , i guess keers is trying to work over time right now with smear tactics. Yawn
Nice comeback... (not)
The question was obvious and it consisted in a request to present your party and what you stand for. In consequence, your answer was either dumb (which is sad), either very true (which is even sadder).
Yo, Winston... You were saying something about policies?
'like I Said who are you?'
this implies people need a degree of notoriety or experience in eRepublik in order to publish opinions or conduct journalism, ie have a voice.
That sounds like elitism
Good point Mr Woldy...
p.s. who are you?
Yes who are you is a good question, level 25 2009 account and no eGov record, so where did all the votes come from? It's just putting 2 and 2 together
good point woldy. was about to say the same thing.
so the called "vendetta" actually support elitism.
This is a contribution.
Given his lack of bias so far, his net contribution to the UK has been wholly positive. He's got you beat.
Ignore him Chaz this is from a man who produced extremely badly photo-shopped pics to try and distance themselves from CCS when he robbed the country blind so as to avoid any of the blame which they still refuse to acknowledge was partly their fault
Hahaha, Prof. J. Moriarty is the best! 🙂
I blame all the multis for me not winning the last presidential elections.
prof showing me up in the humor stakes
up your game
i canne do eit, i've been trained in the art of crude penis jokes and now it's all i know
Its all you need to know.
We have one major policy which TUP should adopt
That is not to run multi accounts for CP roles.
Reread our official position, understand that there is always the risk to put trust in the wrong candidate (multi, cheater, stealer, etc.) and then come back and present to the public real information of interest.
As far as I am concerned, I am happy we took the risk to involve new citizens in running the country and I am also happy that he was banned.
Like I said, I do not tolerate cheaters, but if I have to take the risk of supporting an unknown con in order to promote new faces, that's a risk I'm willing to take.
-Tommiecat :3
I smell something.
garlic?
I thought maybe it was time for him to have a shower
I did eat a Shaorma with garlic earlier today, Sambo.
Taking a big risk with Serbs mate
Wait, are we talking about SSW or BigAnt here?
Haha, 'what policys?'.
I thought Vendetta only had one policy: "Do the complete opposite of what TUP thinks"...
you forgot to mention the bit about anything that strengthen the country as a whole