Why we need companies not resources.
Alexander Hamilton
Greetings America, I’m no longer your President. I enjoyed myself thoroughly and I hope you did too. Hopefully some of the seeds planted late into my term will yet bear fruit, although I know the eWorld wants to keep America and Brazil apart. Our friendship will prevail, despite admin skullduggery in closing the supposedly bugged eUK attack on Shannon adding insult to injury they awarded the eUS the initiative, which meant we would auto attack the eUK and lose our Brazilian MPP for the second time.
Resources; the admins have instituted newish rules that offer a 5% production bonus for each additional resource out of a total of five that a country possesses in two industries; food and weapons. By controlling all five resources for food production bonuses a country can boost its food industry’s production by 25%, providing a significant advantage for its native companies. However I believe this change pales in comparison to the new mechanics governing the location and nationality of companies.
Companies can now be absorbed like political parties by a conquering country, when it has wiped its opponent from the map. Yes that is correct; countries that are wiped lose all of their native companies and must rebuild their industries from scratch. This is a devastating and equally intriguing change that adds a bit of depth to a game that was becoming more and more shallow. No longer do “lulz wars” exist, for any successful conquest of a neighboring country could prove to be an economic bonanza for the victor.
Ireland has recently suffered this fate, as you can see here they only have 6 companies operating in their entire country. While Ireland is a smaller country and the consequences of the UK annexing Ireland’s entire economy aren’t likely to be felt outside of Ireland, a larger country being wiped would certainly cause upheaval in the labor market of the conqueror. Once the regions are inevitably returned to the original owner, the native population will find no jobs in their homeland. Demand for currency is driven in large part by businesses that need currency to pay wages, depriving a country of businesses will cause the value of said currency to collapse. While in the victorious country there will be a shortage of labor, because of all the new companies added to the economy overnight.
The eUS has 4,673 companies, many are not operating. The eUK has 1,232 companies, many are not operating. Were the US to invade the UK seriously and wipe them from the map all of those 1,232 companies would become American. It would amount to a 20% increase in businesses overnight. While not all eUKers would like to operate their companies in America, some would. Wages would rise as these new entrants to the American economy seek to hire American workers to replace their old workforce as it returns to settle the new capital of the UK; Wales.
While it may be far from a sure thing that the eUS would be able to wipe the eUK, there is no guarantee that we would succeed in holding onto resource regions. Additionally companies unlike regions cannot be resistance warred away. I think while securing increased production would be an asset to American companies; the overall economy would benefit more from absorbing the UK’s entire economy in one fell swoop.
Will we do it? Hard to say, wouldn’t be easy. The trolling would be quite good though.
Respectfully submitted for consideration,
Alexander Hamilton
Comments
Holy boring article batman!
Only when wiped out, or by each region conquered?
Only when wiped, companies are no longer bound by regions.
;_; Australia
Time to take Mexico.
Time to take Mexico. x2
Interesting article Hamilton.
With a serious and focused effort, America can pretty easily wipe United Faildom. Same with the Indos. There seems to have been a typical Yank ADD effort into both of those campaigns previously.
Few things:
1) This now means Poland permanently owns all of the companies in our rented regions, right? That sucks.
2) Small countries are basically screwed. Especially in the Mid and Western Europe area.
3) At least there is a decent reason to conquer other nations now, other than "for fun" or "for RL issues" or "to kill off their political parties teeheehee." This is a welcome change.
4) Would have been really nice to own Karnataka or FER while this was implemented.
5) Thank you for writing about this. It is a really big deal and will change the way this game works. When a nation like Spain or France or Russia falls, it will take weeks to even come close to rebuilding. Also, it will be interesting to see which countries get to go for the final region in a nation killing. I can see allies fighting over this.
"2) Small countries are basically screwed. Especially in the Mid and Western Europe area."
I'm not quite so sure this is true. A Country can still continue to produce a certain good w/o actually owning the resource, am I correct? (For example, Grain)
If THAT is true, then it would still be possible to continue to operate businesses within that Country. Minus the resource bonus, of course.
As long as something is produced and consumed, a Country would still have a fighting chance, amirite?
@Blue If a small country is wiped out, it will lose all of its companies and need to create new one again. Combined with the new "Natural Enemy" feature, they could be attacked for free right after regaining independence, and be wiped out all over again. The cycle would make sure that rebuilding would never be possible.
Jumping off this, I'd expect to see much more region based alliance making because of this. The beginning of PanAm was a genius move when all of this is taken into account.
PanAm was always a brilliant idea. The Americas are logistically, awesome. Moving from Europe to the Asian theater, easily. We've seen what it takes to go via a land-bridge to Asia back during the Three Pillars, while going through the Americas is significantly easier.
The only reason such an alliance didn't spring up previously was the lack of another strong regional power in neutral stasis. Canada, Ireland, and Australia are all p cool. But weak. With Brazil's leaving PHX..well the paradigm has changed.
nobody wanna see us together, baby dont matter no ;__;
This is actually infuriating to me.
I'm one of the small amount of people who prefer to run companies over the politics, war, or social malarky. The ante has been really upped.
I am assuming that warzone countries like South Africa, Australia, India and Ireland are majorly hosed and stand little to no chance of ever recovering.
Thanks for writing this, I was just reviewing re: companies & changes last night. Very helpful insight after my being afk for a month.
How was your term? I missed the whole thing ;_;
true about companies, false about Brosil.
Free eTexas & eUniverse o/
invade mexico x3
invade mexico x4
I kind of don't like this rule because of the way it screws smaller countries.
So this really is time to reverse the tables, and take Mexican jobs!
Invade before Brazil beats us to them and their most useful regions
this. this, my friends, is epic.
me want tacos for christmas
voted, an important article
ps: nice article, lots to think about.
I posted a very strong response to the 'natural enemy thread' on admin board, even though many imagine that we, and a few other big nations would potentially benefit. However,in reality, who is going to agree to be our enemy and give us a 10% advantage. However, if some other nations did get someone to go along with natural enemies, it would mess with MPPs... citizenships would go crazy, pto's could go crazy, and ADMIN would reap rewards for gold being spent to straighten out huge messes.
If anyone is interested in reading my long diatribe, I raised a few other issues in another futile attempt to have ADMIN listen to players - Post # 197 http://forum.erepublik.com/showthread.php/105692-Natural-Enemy/page10
If you agree with any of my points, of have any others to add, please start to post their and add our voice to this continual (seemingly one-sided) dialog. We, e-USA, appear to be vastly underrepresented on these boards.
Good for us but probably not a good idea from the game. When a country is destroyed with almost no chances of coming back i would assume their user numbers would drop significantly.
@s0beit What ends up happening is people from that county in RL pay real money for gold to tank and reclaim their country. This means more money for eRep. Is that a little twisted? Yeh. Does it mean more money for eRep? Probably. Is that better for the whole community in the long run? Yes.
They have been moving in this direction for a while. When a country is under threat, people spend more RL money to hep defend it. The economics is simple. It helps pay for the game and for more staff and more improvements/support. I'm fine with it.
OUT OF ALL MY 12 COMPANIES IN ALL MY ORGS, NONE ARE OPEN BECAUSE ADMIN ARE COMPLETE FUCKWITS