WHS: What is accountability
Releasethe Krakken
Accountability eIre means we should entrust our money in safe hands and such safe hands should account for every cent monthly!
First this is why most South Africans is a bit more clue'd up by politics. The familiar South African scenario Money is wasted/stolen/missing in hands of politician X who enriched himself/claims to know nothing about it/ purports his innocence. The media/opposition goes apesjit. The SA government (aka the majority ANC +-69
😵denies there is anything wrong and refuses to punish politician X.
We have so many "gates" Nkandlagate ,Guptagate etc etc we can probably build a political zoo with all of our "gates". The problem is the lower you go the more epidemic it gets. But enough of politics.
After several years the storms passes and they can continue on their journey:
The current one is the 10 million donation we made to a development project run by Jack Warner prior to the 2010 Soccer World Cup. The project allegedly* never existed.
So WHS I dont agree as well that the dictator should just sit back while a corrupt CP plunders our treasury. He must have the role to safeguard us from bad CP's.
After all low finances means we are vulnerable. Dictator gives us the option to say we are tired of this sh* that the CP can just steal all money and then its considered his by erepublik. Money can be moved by dictator to all departments without need for CP. Yes the cp should be allowed to say give 100k for finance give 30 k for IA or give 25k for community. Its no longer imo needed to say give 50k to CP to distribute .
I say we take that option.
If you dont agree with this WHS who gives a ... and LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE
KRAKKEN FOR DICTATOR!!!
*its alleged by the fbi that money was used by jack warner etc etc.
Comments
Thanks for the article...I am honoured 😛
Missed my point however...
"If you don't agree with this WHS who gives a ... and LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE"
Exactly let the people decide on the type of system they want and hands on or hand off. At the moment we have everyone agreed except Don (now you) that it's hand off.
If you want it the other way my point is that must be agreed before going to vote,
My view is if it's Hands On then some candidates are entirely unsuited for that job.
hands on hands off will depend on the eejit you guy put forward as candidate and then get elected. if it someone like kuthesh - hands on others might be more hands off. the rules quite clearly state that a person who deals wth the money in orgs without permission of dictator is guilty of an offence and will be punished by a perma ban. so whs that means at each term dictator wll have to give authority and permission for new players appointed to cp /mof to
handle "his money"
what you suggest is CONTRA the law son!
While the President might still be able to access the organizations for some time before the email has been changed, the President doesn’t have a right to do any actions in the organizations when the Dictator is in office. These actions include, but are not limited to, donating any assets from the organization, selling products or making exchanges in the Monetary Market. If such actions are done when the Dictator has been in charge, all actions will be reverted and the President might be penalized.
that creates a safeguard from the cp but not from the dictator who can change passwords if he wants. but level of access must be controlled by him. its in the rules .and as well he should never give admin passwords to cp this way they can never take control of a org.
as mof/dictator dc would obviously have a bigger role to play. anyway jus get the effin vote over we can discuss his/her role afterwards if there is a need
Whs youre sad guy.