Who I'm Rooting for in Presidential Elections
•
by Ciel Phantom
I feel ashamed of my last article as it turned into debate grounds. Some just hold grudges, others like i said, just debate about the matter. Im not one to hold a grudge. eAustria is too much of a country for grudges between ePoliticians to be held, especially when most of them are pretty much aiming towards the same goal, for eAustria to be moved further up the chain. As Teh Famzay said "If you want a country to make progress, you need to work together."
Who I'm Rooting for in Presidential Elections
Okay, so one day has technically passed since my last article and I promised to readers that I would write on every one-two days whether it be short or long.
Moving on, as you know the Presidential Elections are set to take place in two days. This is pretty interesting for eAustria because Rangely has said that he will not be running again so this leaves us with Alfred Ball (National Front Austria), Borojevic von Bonjar (DWRRP) and OmuNegru9 (Austrian Green Party).
The Way I see it & Who my Vote goes to
I'm not going to vote on this elections based on what party the candidates represent or previous comments made by either candidate. Noone should vote that way, in my opinion that is. So, now on to what Im looking for in a candidate. My vote goes to which ever candidate is ready to bring eAustria out of neutrality, as long as they promise to show atleast a sign of this escape from neutrality, whether it be long term or short term, that pretty much satisfies me. In majority of my articles Ive been repeating the fact that eAustria should be able to get one more ally. Maybe a power country this time? Following up on those statements, Rangeley and his Administration actually did satisfy me with there work in this part. Signing a MPP with Malaysia and Re-Signing one with France. Two good things. Malaysia has been active in war for some while now. Im hoping that whoever is elected continues Rangeley's work in the Alliance department.
Thanks for reading.
Thanks in advance for subscriptions and votes!
~Ciel Phantom, Socialist Party~
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Im with you eBro.
Oh and by the way, FIRST!
Voted
Thanks for voting on my recent articles Shayan 😃
Voted./
I'm not candidating. I've pushed the button by mistake. I can't really candidate because the party is not in top 5.
Like I said in my article about Austria Green Party, I don't think that eAustria is that strong to mean something for big countrys. From my point of view the best thing is that we have an agreement with our neighbors and have the border safe.
And having a MPP for training wars is something different from having a MPP as an ally.
What are you talking about Omu {Referring to last two lines}. If you scroll through my articles, I have not said anything about training wars. I just pointed out that having an ally that participates in a war every so now and then would benefit eAustria in a huge way. Like for example, it gives players who just achieved level five, a chance to level up in eAustria instead of having to move like I had to do. Moved to eUSA and returned when I got to level twelve.
Excuse me but from what I know the MPP that assure us battles is the one with Malaysia. At least that what Rangeley said it would be signed for.
Exactly, is that not what I wrote about?...The point was that I was hoping that whomever was elected would continue that. Do you need to re-read it?
Lol
"My vote goes to which ever candidate is ready to bring eAustria out of neutrality" why is that?
Since you have training wars every day why do you need to be part of an alliance that could put you in danger. For example now eFrance is almost connquered. As we are their ally and we have fought among them we are the next target. Fortunately eSpain only wants to revenge on eFrance.
So from my point of view, entering into one alliance is pretty dangerous.
"As we are their ally and we have fought among them we are the next target"
Really? I thought they had more than one ally. Im not even sure if that makes us a target
"Since you have training wars every day why do you need to be part of an alliance that could put you in danger"
I did not give a specific country to ally ourselves with. Now did I? I dont see how just being apart of an alliance can put us in danger. I could understand if we signed with a country and became there only ally. But, like I said. I did not point out any specific country.
"But, like I said. I did not point out any specific country." - neither do I. It doesn't matter which alliance you enter. That alliance could be defeated and go down and your country might suffer just because it is part of that alliance. I give you an exemple my friend. And we are not a target for eSpain because I've told you they only want to revenge on eFrance.
"And we are not a target for eSpain because I've told you they only want to revenge on eFrance."
Uhm, I don't think I said we were. Anyways..
"hat alliance could be defeated and go down and your country might suffer just because it is part of that alliance"
In what way? Are you still implying that we would be a target despite the number of allies that country would have?
I dont see how you are able to comment on this article like that especially since I have not wrote much on the "Getting a New Ally" part in this article. I mainly pointed out the benefits of us continuing to ally ourselves with Malaysia and France. And wishing that whoever was elected would ocntinue that.
My vote goes to which ever candidate is ready to bring eAustria out of neutrality
When, I said that, I did not mean like leaving out of neutrality to join those big alliances. I just clearly meant to express opinion more.And I dont mean like "GOO EDEEN! WOOO! EDEN!" Would that not attract more players? I think it would. Simply one step like expressing sorrow/remorse for a country and whatnot.
"Are you still implying that we would be a target despite the number of allies that country would have?" - yes I am. It doesn't matter how many ally are into one alliance. It is something logical. If 2 or 3 guy come to you and beat you up, you don't want to revenge on all 3 don't you? You just want to revenge on only one of them?
"I mainly pointed out the benefits of us continuing to ally ourselves" - I don't have nothing against that.
"When, I said that, I did not mean like leaving out of neutrality to join those big alliances" - well you should have told that in the article because there is place for interpretation.
"It is something logical. If 2 or 3 guy come to you and beat you up, you don't want to revenge on all 3 don't you? You just want to revenge on only one of them?"
One again, I did not specify any country meaning it could possibly be more than seven allies. Very low chances. Oh and if you were supposedly beat up, would you go back for revenge if they were bigger than you? For example if a smaller country, possibly Thailand or Belgium were to engage in war with eAustria. That we would actually have a chance to win. Also, Im sure if we helped our allies they would return the favor..
"well you should have told that in the article because there is place for interpretation."
Yup, yup. I should have, I guess.
voted
Thanks VOID
"Oh and if you were supposedly beat up, would you go back for revenge if they were bigger than you?" - with this question you've answered why we shouldn't enter into one alliance. When you are small and insignificant you should stay in your bench. Do you relly think that if you are part of one alliance that has how many ally you want (2,3 - 8,9,20 ) do you think you mean something for them when you don't have any power? Do you think that they will help you just because you fight with them? They don't. They will remain with powerful ally and forget you.
Omu, this debate you are having with him clearly shows your lack of expierience in foreign policy.
@ Omu
When you post comments like for example "do you think you mean something for them when you don't have any power?" Are you speaking for every country in the eWorld? Im sure an alliance means more to a country.
And the point to that whole section was to say: Ive been stressing the fact that eAustria needs one more ally that would benefit us. Rangeley got that done. I hope next President will carry that torch on and re-sign the MPP.
That is why I used the words "Following Up"
It may show that. Foreign affairs is not my strength. But it shows that you have to think before entering in one alliance or other.
"Are you speaking for every country in the eWorld? Im sure an alliance means more to a country." - I'm sure that a country doesn't mean an alliance.
"And the point to that whole section was to say: Ive been stressing the fact that eAustria needs one more ally that would benefit us. Rangeley got that done. I hope next President will carry that torch on and re-sign the MPP" - I agree. But that country doesn't have to be part of an alliance. It could be just a coutry that provide us training wars.
"I'm sure that a country doesn't mean an alliance"
Im sure you would know...*sarcasm*
Tell me something Ciel : do you see eSlovenia on the map? Because I don't see it. eSlovenia is part of Phoenix isn't it? Phoenix has 15 members is that right? Well tell me Ciel why does't Phoenix do something about that? eSlovenia are part of their alliance. Oh yeah, I forgot. eSlovenia is nothing compared to eBrazil, eHungary or eRussia.
Ah, so you know what's going on in Phoenix now. Maybe they could be focusing on other stuff just like the eRomania situation with EDEN.
25th COMMENT!
LOL. So what you say is that Phoenix is not showing any interest in helping eSlovenia. You showed yourself that being in an alliance even it has more ally is not that good.
And I know what's going on in the eWorld, not just in Phoenix.
Uhm, appearantly you dont. You completely miss interpreted that. Please read international articles!
I've done that.
Well, thanks for putting an end to that. Went on for awhile....
Vot fro Alfred Ball 😃