USA fail at UK - There was a solution

Day 820, 11:49 • Published in USA Hungary • by Cantabrum indoctum

Please don't get me wrong. I just want you to win over UK but the actual situation is your fault.

On my previous article, i was praising you for your first victory against UK and then asking you what plans did you have. In that time it seemed that your strategy was not the best, though, finally it worked. But once again, i can't understand why, more fails (the first one was rushing into london before norwegian approach). Today you got a great opportunity to stop UK advance by using Spain as blockade but, incomprehensible, you haven't use it and now the situation is quite harsh.

I'll explain you what i've been saying for the last 20 hours.

If you had given West Midlands and North West of England to Spain, now England wouldn't be able to attack you, so 24 hours later, you will get again the chance to attack, meanwhile, conquering North East of England from Norway and giving it to Spain means that England was trapped between Spain and Norway at Yorkshire. Now, England was faster than Norway and also Yorkshire is under British+mpp attack. The same goes for the canadian territory at Scotland in less than 48 hours it could be under british attack.

But now the situation is quite bad. It was all because strategic failures and maybe some kind of pride or so much confidence, or... whatever. Next step? try to save as much as we can. Give to Spain the las territories you have in England so in a few days you can try again.

Please, if you don't mind, explain me why the american strategy at UK was like that and what was expected. I think that the idea i was suggesting was the best of the choices, with that strategy, UK won't be able to go further than 4 regions, from Yorkshire to London and as final result, loosing the iniciative.