The Federalist Party
Day 323, 16:53
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by Rise
Well as it appears RfC wont be renamed and its ideals really dont seem to coincide with the Federalists I am becoming more and more interested in starting a new political party, The Federalist Party. Our center ideal is a fiscally sound and strong nationalistic government, we focus on Nationalism and Federalism. We are a a non-interventionist party, we avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense.
Anyway its just an idea, if your interested please let me know.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I believe that RFC should be renamed the Federalist Party and I was actually planning on writing an article about that subject tonight. I would be interested in having a Federalist Party.
Hi took 🙂
Well i wish RfC would be renamed and revamped ideally but with this \"abstention equals a \"no\" vote\" i really dont see how a name change will come about. Even if the name is changed the ideals as they stand now are not Federalist ones in a true sense.
But if the name change does not happen and the ideals are not switched then I will look very closely into starting a new party and i hope you and others will join and help. This article is mainly to see if there is a base out there for the Federalist Party.
i like all of those things except the non interventionist
in game, im huge for spreading our might to random things, to an extent of course
Hi Troy, glad to see another RfC member comment on here.
\"spreading our might\" means what? War with countries just because? Do you understand how war effects our markets, our citizens and our companies?
I must disagree with this idea of Waring just to War. We should only war if our country is territorial in danger.
well yea go to war, it has higher leveled people with houses to buy Q4 food, buy tons of gifts, seems like a positive.
not to mention it is a game, and after a while of no war many people including me are just getting bored sitting around, but i forgot to say good luck with whatever your planning on doing
the prices on everything increase, companies run out of items, companies fail and the ones that dont struggle not to mention the citizen who makes 2-4 usd a day and cant afford to buy q1 food at 1usd because of the drastic buy out on the items.
I will quote Ron Paul \"War is never economically beneficial except for those in position to profit from war expenditures\"
I\'m right there with you Rise... You start a party, call me and I\'m there..
Although, don\'t start a party that has 5 people.. Get a secret number from those who would switch if one was started so that we hit the scene with a strong showing..
ALBY!!!
I\'m glad you are with us on this and yes i agree if this happens we need to gain a decent amount of members before going public. Its to bad this got pushed off the page but there is also a post on the eusa forums about this.
http://erepublikusa.com/forums/index.php?topic=99.0
I agree. Federalism is the fuel on which the engine of this game runs. Good idea.
Thanks Haugenmatt, i know your a UCP member and im glad to see this idea reaches across party lines 🙂
Interesting idea especially agree with yout attention to wars only connected with self-defence I think better would be self-defence and with agreement to help every MPP country which was attacked by other.
Nationalism you mean by making everything to make more profit for example to national companies on markets than from other with which eUS has trade agreements, I hope?
I will think about your idea for now I endorse idea maybe not with coming for now but when I will hear more I think I would do this.
Voted
By nationalism I mean several things first and foremost would be buying eUSA products! Worry only about eUS and not try to get involved in affairs of other countries, cut our own grass before we cut someone else\'s.
OK something near to newest politic of one candidate in RL to be US president. Okay you can count on my also if you will start more from planning to making it become. 🙂 If You need help Im open to do something.
intriguing...I would go for it
YAY 2 more of my favorite people!
Thanks for all the support for the idea, this might become reality sooner than later. But we still would need to have more members to really grab the attention of the country, but we have to start somewhere.
I\'d jump on in a heart beat.
Federalism seems pretty logical and RfC is a mess. (It\'s going to break up before the next election I think.)
Interesting idea.
Firstly, a null vote is NOT, NOT, NOT a vote for no.
Secondly, assuming I win the elections, the Federalist Party will very much be considered as a new name.
Hi TGM
I understand from your comment on the party report that a null vote is not a no vote but prier it was not clear. As for the name change, as it stands now there is not enough votes to change the name and even if the name is changed it has been pointed out that the ideals of the party dont match the name, Federalist Party in any degree. And the ideals of RfC as they stand now are fine for those who agree with them but for myself and others we dont agree with them.
IF RfC members want to change the ideals of the party than I\'m sure myself and others would be fine with the party. But just a name change is not suitable for me and i think many others aswell, especially not to a name that misrepresents the party.
II\'d like the RfC to completely reform into a Federalist Party (ideas and name changes) BUT that\'d be a pretty nasty bait and switch on people.
I\'m laughing to myself at how \"heated\" this is and how there are different sides forming and that is how America progressed from Federalist and Progressives and that stuff to Democrat and Republican. Only we\'re doing it in reverse.
(Go Federalism)