The eUSA's Future in ATLANTIS
•
by gbpacker
Recently, scrabman wrote an article addressing our country's stance on the Sweden-Germany deal. Basically, he said we would remain allied with Sweden because they are more important to our success on the world stage. Many might talk about how we shouldn't do this because we are wronging Germany. WHO CARES?! This isn't the RW and, as such, we shouldn't care about being mean! The only thing we should care about is crushing the rest of the eWorld beneath our Red, White, and Blue feet! Sweden is stronger than Germany and more important to our success so we should support them.We should do anything in our power, short of hacking the game, to ensure the USA's success.
Scrabman also wrote about the State Department considering a post-ATLANTIS existence. This is a good thing. With Romania "going turtle", as scrabman put it, the alliance becomes much weaker. Supporting countries that aren't as strong as us will weaken us. As I said before: This isn't the RW and we shouldn't care whether people like us unless it will weaken us. Our ultimate goal should be this: WE, THE eUSA WANT TO BE THE UNARGUABLY STRONGEST COUNTRY IN THE NEW WORLD! Nothing should stand in the way of that unless it be the rights of our own citizens.
FOR MORE ON SCRABMAN'S GREAT ARTICLE SEE: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/usa-and-the-atlantis-problem-war-games-postponed--803283/1/20
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
The world just go to sh*t when Romania quit. It's like a hole the black hole where everything is getting pulled into.
i think eUSA should stick to eSweden because is a faithfull aly unlike Germany. eRomania is going turtle for a while because some of the teritories that she lost were conquered with the aid of bug exploit but the media from eRomania don't encourage ecitizens to kill their characters but stay with the minimum necessary - work and train. thou it is eUSA's decision on who's side is..
go Atlantis!