The Canadian National Coalition's future?
hawkerhunter07
I've always been a member of the Canadian Empire Party (and ex-Canadian Progressive Front, and ex-Norsefire Party of Canada) family.
But after Canada was conquered, all our parties were transferred to eFrance.
To be able to conduct proper Congressional Elections, the Canadian National Coalition (CNC) has been created in the newly reborn eCanada.
The Canadian National Coalition gave the opportunity to candidates from all the Canadian parties to run for Congress.
Then, the top parties in eCanada "came back": the Canadian Social Democrats (CSD) first, then the Canadian Paradox Party (CPP) and the Democratic Action League (DAL), and finally the Canadian Empire Party, but under an other name; the Canadian Progressive Front (CPF) which was in fact the predecessor's of the CEP.
For some, the CNC was just a temporary party, since it had no political view, or stance. In their eyes, it isn't bound to continue as an eCanadian Party, and maybe should be replaced.
I think the contrary. I think the Canadian National Coalition has in fact a political view, and a stance;
effectively, this party's objective is to achieve party collaboration in eCanada, and as I used to say in the past, while CEP Party President; end the "eCanadian Parties War" which was a part of our everyday life.
This is why, I have decided to succeed to Goran Thrax as Party President of the Canadian National Coalition.
This CNC will be friendly to all parties, be it the CEP or the DAL, the CSD or the CPP.
What I plan to achieve if I become Party President is mainly creating first a Party Forum for the Canadian National Coalition, where CNC members will be able to discuss about the Congress acts, the Elections, the Parties positions on all issues, etc... There will of course be what I call "Party Embassies", which means each eCanadian Party will be able to send an "Ambassador" to the CNC. They will be granted their own section on the forums.
I will also support member involvement. After all, I am a fan of true democracy. CNC Members will have a say in every important decision the party makes. They will choose the Candidate for Presidency, etc...
In case we make it to Country Presidency, I will support "Cabinet Equity", meaning we will try to have the same number of Ministers from each Canadian Party. We will also grant Party Leaders Cabinet Access
I still haven't decided who would be my Vice President, but I already have an idea. I will also instate a Council, which will be a group of experienced and active people who will help me in leading the party.
I have always hear😛
"Union is strength". And that's what Canada needs right now; party unity to help rebuild Canada and get all our Regions back!
Thank you
marcchelala
Comments
The CNC is a hoax now. It was proposed as a temporary place holder until all the Canadian parties were recreated, to prevent a PTO.
It served its purpose and only keeps itself alive now because it has the most members, and wants to enjoy the political affluence.
The argument that we require 1 unified party to have one unified voice is the argument of fascism. It is the debate and diversity of the political system that founds democracy.
"For some, the CNC was just a temporary party, since it had no political view, or stance. In their eyes, it isn't bound to continue as an eCanadian Party, and maybe should be replaced."
What did I say? Told you! 😛
Also, I never said everyone must be the same, and have the same opinion!
Diversity and a variety of opinions is very important to democracy of course! But by unity we mean having the other parties standing with us, and supporting us, instead of being an obstacle to us.
And that shall be achieved through discussion and debate and voting.
Haha, ya, I didn't mean it to come off as harsh as it did sir. I guess I'm just bitter you stole so many CSD constituents😛
As long as your willing to work towards civility, co-operation, and a bridging of opponents, I can see a place for the CNC with such a mandate. I can't guarantee that that is a outlook that will get you elected though, but it certainly seems like one that deserves a bit of support. Goodluck with it.
Great article for us kids who are too young to remember what it was like before those e-pigs PEACE invaded.
I like your views Marcchelala, I've been uneasy with the aggressive party politics for quite some time now. I also think that there is a place for a party like the one you described.
But at the same time, I think you will need to take stronger stance on current political issues and/or propose a defining project for eCanada to legitimize your party's stance in the political spectrum.
I'm locking forward to see what you will propose and will take a close look at it since, I've always got great respect for you and what you did/do for eCanada.
Nice article.
Here is my question for the CNC:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/tyler-f-durden-on-politics-933512/1/all" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/tyle[..]1/all
Your platform isn't very inovoative at all. Every single party has a forum, goes for a bipartisan cabinet (it isn't possible to have one stacked party anyhow) and include members into leadership positions.
also, Pm'd you about error.
Every single party BUT the CNC. It still doesn't have one.
Oh and Tyler, the answer to your question for CNC is this article.