Stop ou encore - part 3 - reactions

Day 567, 07:19 • Published in Netherlands Netherlands • by Gazy


A answer to the article of Dionysus (found here : http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/stop-o...us-823941/1/20) ...

It's true that is a good article, almost if there is more attacks on BP and his president than explanations on the facts BP described. But we would like to thanks him for trying to being constructive, and to have made a strutured article and not just a comment.

We just want to explain that we cannot let people believe you on two points.

You said : "There also was a lot to do about the voting process for the Supreme Court. Belgian Party members were amongst the people who did not agree to the way the voting was done, twice. Frerk decided to listen to what Belgian Party members said and started a new (third) vote. But, again, that was not good according to Belgian Party members. A candidate that did get elected in the other elections (which they rejected at first), now should be officially appointed as judge. I am all for democracy, but a change of mind when a Belgian Party member is elected, is wrong in my eyes. What would have been better is that Belgian Party would have requested a postponement of the elections, work things out internally and then start over again. Instead it was decided to keep confronting Frerk. Indeed, Frerk made some mistakes he should not have, but again, everyone makes mistakes. The stubborness of both Frerk and bicky at least became clear in that discussion."

Two of ours ministers and a governmental advisor told the Minister of Home Affairs to postpone the elections the second time and to wait for an governmental agreement on how to make the vote. He didnt and he started the poll. Many citizens asked him about what he will do if there were not 3 judges elected, and he didnt answered. He decided to wait the end of the poll, and the day after, to cancelled again the vote. If he wanted to cancelled it, why does he wait the end of the results ? I think it's a deny of democracy and a political decision. Now, reading that BP members changes their mind because one of them was elected is not fair. Maybe you try to protect the old Minister of Home Affairs, but there is no need. BP members also knew that with the new poll, they wont be any problem to see Aibistro elected again if they decided to vote for him again. What you said is a miss use of the truth. We can also add that BP was not the only party to agreed on this.

Second point, you said : "A point they also speak about: the BEF (Belgian Francs) issue. Many BEF are currently still with the privately owned organization Belgian Local Government. Belgian Party claims that the colleagues in the government are silent. This is complete and utter nonsense. There were many talks with the people in charge of Belgian Local Government, and some people from your coalition partners actually were angry about what was happening. I know, because I was there at the time when it was being discussed. Were you as well, bicky? Your claim they went silent is ridiculous and disrespectful to them who worked hard to help you achieve your wishes."

You know BLG is not an privately owned organization. This is how this organisation signed his messages :
"Grtz
Roeland Creve
Belgian Minister of Health
Belgisch Minister van Gezondheid
Ministre Belge de Santé "
But it changes maybe nothing for you, for us it change the fact we cannot believe anymore in all the lies around this organisation.

Thanks for reading.