referendum 005: stop state funding the private m.u.
Day 1,631, 11:52
•
Published in Belgium 
•
by
•
by lin0leum
yo again citizens,
this time lcc brings infront of u the comrade's avegan proposal to stop funding private military unit, belgian paras, from the common state treasury.
paras is closed unit of 9 strongest citizens of belgium. previous the belgian paras funding law (voted on the erepbelgium phorum few weeks ago) allows these already most powerful citizens to recieve 60g per member monthly to boost their stats even further.
express ur opinions with comments. lcc delegates will know how to vote so.
SHALL THE STATE STOP THE FUNDING OF PRIVATE MILITARY UNIT - THE BELGIAN PARAS?
[YES - NO - ABSTAIN]
happy decision making.
lin0leum, lcc delegate of the clicking masses
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
NO
NO
No
@ lin0leum
Your little poll here is bias and not objective. You stressed only the cost and used bias language like "powerful citizens" to further your agenda and interest. This referendum like all others are nothing but LCC political tool to set the agenda and to manipulate politics.
This kind of polling is an intellectual travesty that insults the dignity and integrity of the good peoples of eBE. What do you take us for, fools? LCC should wake up and smell the coffee.
Konrad + 1 and NO
YES
No
Hard YES, it's not necessary to funding BP, eBelgium is not involved in any battle now and they take ours gold? For what? Only six people, 60g per person? Misunderstanding...
No
No.
No
No.
Yes.
No
Yes.
no
No
No.
Yes.
No
I think eBelgium needs to invest in it's future and needs to become more powerfull. This can only by supporting our stronger fighters. Otherwise the gap between the other strong fighters in erep is only getting bigger
No.
(... but I don't consider that thing completely "black or white")
No
NO
no
I do find it really interesting that the LCC who are "the 99 percent" are the only ones (besides Giorgos) who voted to end this program.
As of now, out of 23 votes, only 5 voted Yes and 18 voted No. That means:
21 percent YES
78 percent NO
NO
No
Yes
NO
YES!
No
NO
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
NO
eBelgium needs strong soldiers to defend it from the inside!
to Tecuvo : Quadruple post in a row man! 😛
to Konrad : This type of referendum is indeed biased, the article is giving only one opinion and those that with to know more only get the vote count and another proposition against the paras. No link to the debate about the first funding (or the extension) of the paras is given. No space in the article for arguments pro...
It is indeed a parody of a referendum...
no
Yes
Uh oh you're losing, quick make more accounts!
NO
I think the Para's budget should be INCREASED to 4G/day/soldier.
No
Nope.
By the way, Jarkesh shouldn't count, he's polish now 😛
The people clearly has spoken here. Will the LCC representative/ council, whatever you call it, will vote NO in congress base on the voice of the people?
No
no
no
yes - 8, no - 29
(tecuvo, jarkesh, thomasred r not citizens)
thx for participation