RECALL for justice about Kosovo's issue!
LioneX aKa MeDzeLi
Mason Cooley
Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality.
Jules de Gaultier
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense.
Tom Clancy
Dear Kosovo Albanian citizens,as we can see the quotes above there clearly show us that reality not always
is acceptable for everyone ,in this case for Admins of the game.
I took a courage about writing this article caring less if they will ban me forever after because it's my duty
as Kosovo citizen to protect my rights and identity.I don't want to be a part of a game which doesn't recognize me
and my country,why would I spend my time and money in there if I don't have a freedom of speech ?!
I think we should set a charity so we can purchase a 2012 map for eRepublik Admins because it seems
like they are stuck at 90's.
Let's see what they claim:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ERepublik
"Upon joining, a citizen picks which virtual country he wishes to join. Each of these countries is named after an actual
country in the real world"
after an actual country in the real world,right erepublik?Then where is Kosovo?
Why am I a Kosovo citizen in real life but not in your virtual game?!
#Flabbergasted
Not fair at all!
I'll carry my passport everytime I log in in erepublik ,so I can freely be Kosovo citizen like I'm in reality,at least
you can't stop me from doing that.
an Albanian quote says:Genjeshtra i ka kembet e shkurtera,so truth will always find its way and you are at your wit's end
when it comes to deleting our articles.
PEACE!!
Comments
v o/
V
Judge Cançado Trindade - ICJ Hero, quotes on Kosovo case
162. The argument that, since the utmost violence of 1998-1999 one decade has passed and the “conflict is over”, somehow “buried” into oblivion, and that there is peace today in Kosovo and the aforementioned repression belongs to the past, is in my view superficial, if not unsustainable. It leads precisely to approach the matter from a “technical” point of view, making abstraction of the human sufferings of the recent past. The effects of oppression are still present, and account for Kosovo’s declaration of independence on 17 February 2008. One cannot erase the massive violations of human rights and of International Humanitarian Law of the recent past, by invoking the passing of time.
163. To attempt to make abstraction of the suffering of the people or population of Kosovo in the years of repression is an illusory exercise. The scars of the bloodshed will take a long time to heal, they will take generations to heal. The experience, in this connection, of the recent adjudication by international human rights tribunals such as the Inter-American and the European Courts of Human Rights, of cases of massacres lodged with them, contains invaluable lessons, worthy of attention and deserving of being rescued in this respect. One of such lessons lies in the enhanced centrality of the position of those victimized by human cruelty, and of their suffering.
180. Thus, in the line of the previous considerations, the government of a State which incurs into grave and systematic violations of human rights ceases to represent the people or population victimized. This understanding has been reiterated, in even stronger terms, at the outcome of the I World Conference on Human Rights held in Vienna, by the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (paragraph 2), which restates:
- “(…) The World Conference on Human Rights considers the denial of the right of self-determination as a violation of human rights and underlines the importance of the effective realization of this right. In accordance with the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, this shall not be construed as authorizing or encouraging any action which would dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and independent States conducting themselves in compliance with the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples and thus possessed of a government representing the whole people belonging to the territory without distinction of any kind” [emphasis added].
181. The final document of a memorable United Nations World Conference, - the II World Conference on Human Rights of 1993, - went further than the 1970 Declaration of Principles, in proscribing discrimination “of any kind”. The massive violations of human rights and international humanitarian law to which the Kosovar Albanians were subjected in the nineties met the basic criterion set forth in the 1970 U.N. Declaration of Principles, and enlarged in scope in the 1993 final document of the U.N.’s II World Conference on Human Rights. The entitlement to self-determination of the victimized population emerged, as the claim to territorial integrity could no longer be relied upon by the willing victimizers.
229. It may be recalled that the UNMIK Constitutional Framework for Kosovo (2001) itself (cf. supra), clarifying the U.N. approach to matter at issue, pointed out that Kosovo is “an entity” which, “with its people, has unique historical, legal, cultural and linguistic attributes”
To these elements I would add yet another one, - and a significant one, - namely, that of common suffering: common suffering creates a strong sense of identity. Many centuries ago, Aeschylus (525-circa 456 b.C.) had an intuition to that, in his penetrating Oresteian Trilogy: he made clear, in the third choral Ode in Agamemnon, and in the culmination of the final procession in The Eumenides, - that human beings learn by suffering, and they ultimately learn not simply how to avoid suffering, but how to do right and to achieve justice. Nowadays, in 2010, so many centuries later, I wonder whether Aeschylus was being, perhaps, a bit too confident, but, in any case, I greatly sympathize with his brave message, which I regard as a most valuable and a timeless or perennial one.