Q4 Houses - WAAAAAAAAY To Expensive!
Nelsaidi
I hope you know Q4 houses used to cost around £350, they arew now being sold at £600+, i ruge you not to buy these as they are rip offs!
You are reading an article written by a citizen of eRepublik, an immersive multiplayer strategy game based on real life countries. Create your own character and help your country achieve its glory while establishing yourself as a war hero, renowned publisher or finance guru.
Nelsaidi
I hope you know Q4 houses used to cost around £350, they arew now being sold at £600+, i ruge you not to buy these as they are rip offs!
Comments
il buy one now kk
...
get a job...
i bought mine fo 145 GBP 🙂
I bought mine for 300 GBP 🙂
Oh yeah and Clamp offered me higher wages when I was there, but this new dude doesn\'t offer as much
Nels, invest 100G in Hot Housing and we\'re sorted 😉
Sax, how much do you get paid now?
Nah i cant invest 100g 🙁
Sorry, just try and get rid of ur current companies quicker
Sell both food.hospital, even at a lower price then goto Q5 housnig
Q5 aint coming out for months, and I need to sell all 3 companies 🙂
How do you ruge something?
Just jkoing with ya.
Yes, but Clamp could only barely afford to sell at his prices, mainly because of employing PeteNeon rather cheaper than he otherwise would have. As for high prices/lower wages, it takes a while to figure out market conditions, which is what i\'m trying to do. I want to see what wages i can afford. As for rip-offs, you might wish to attract attention to the old price of your Q4 food. You used to sell at over 3 GBP, and yet now you sell comfortably at 2 or lower.
Yes, but Q4 housing sold at 250(ish)GBP, and your selling at 600...
prices have all come down in the food industry, and were generally coming down in the housing industry as well.
just remember the fact that food has become that much cheaper means that people don\'t have to buy your rip off houses
SaxMyster is the best \"living room maker\" on Erepublik, he will get payd as much as he will ask 😛
Anyone selling Q4 housing at 250 with current wages has no business sense, and mr.brodie, you don\'t seem to understand business. Just because one person sells at thoughtless prices, it doesn\'t mean it\'s sustainable. Good business is not just about guesswork.
I didn\'t expect the house to sell at 600GBP. But i wanted to test the market, see what i can sell at, and so see what wages i can afford. If you compare this to real life, people spend 25 years paying off a mortgage. Using average wages and erepublik time scales, 600GBP equates to less than 17 years.
\"and mr.brodie, you don\'t seem to understand business\" LOL!
wtf? Selling a £250 with them wages is easy. Chris and I both paid wages much better than what you are. 17GBP for like 5.75 skill, we both survided. I can\'t be bothered to run the buissness anymore, but if I was, you would have like no workers at all.
Bear in mind, i\'ve seen the wages Chris used to sell at. He didn\'t pay anywhere near 17GBP.
In addition, try doing some maths. Wages that high would push production costs to about 400GBP, so lets see some evidence for your claims. In addition, yes, you might be able to steal my workers, but only by offering wages you cannot afford, or by inflating prices.
Trust me, when me and Chris were having wage wars, they were easily 17GBP.
With the mass of workers I had, I produced houses very quickly, and sold them very quickly allowing me to keep producing. That\'s why my housing company is the best in the country. And it is a Q level less...
Again i say, show me some maths. Just because you produced and sold houses quickly, while you may not have had liquidity problems, with wages like 17GBP the overall bank balance trend would have been downwards.
No, because of the productivity that the wages attracted and because of the fast sales money kept moving in.
I produced a house a day, which was easily £1000 a week, and the company kept going strongly until I focused on food.
You can easily sell houses at £300 and make profit.
To sell a house at 300 GBP, and pay 17GBP even for skill 6 workers (assuming workers are paid in proportion with this), then to break even i\'d need 50 employees. So seriously, back up your claims with some evidence, i.e. maths using the productivity formula, or stop making false claims.