Q1 Food Problems & Why ADSP Shouldn't Be Reelected
Australian Warlord
Those who've been reading the eAus news will know that I've said that the shortage of Q1 food is due to a lack of companies that can only be addressed by the return of our territories.
THE ADSP PP (Br0adside) and other ADSP members have attacked me claiming that the Q1 food situation is due to a lack of workers.
It's simple to know who's correct & that's to check the jobboards. If a shortage of workers is causing the Q1 food problems then there'd be a heap of vacancies in firms that don't have enough workers. So lets check that.
At the time of the comments (last night), there was only one Q1 food eBusiness seeking workers, eRadicate Foods. The number of employees it had, 10. As such it's clear that the current situation isn't caused by a labour shortage.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
However the inability of these people to understand what's causing the Q1 food problems isn't why you shouldn't vote the ADSP back in, another reason is.
The reason why you shouldn't vote the ADSP back in is the way in which the ADSP PP responded to the suggestion that the Q1 food problem was caused by a lack of Q1 food eBusinesses that can only sort itself out when eAustralia regains it's territories. The first thing that Br0ad did was to drag eAus news back into the gutter with flaming sessions (not the only one granted).
The second thing Br0ad did was argue that returning occupied territories to eAustralia was bad. This is a continuing theme, that eIndonesia should keep occupied territories as a "permanent gift", that they're good for eIndonesia & bad for eAustralia.
It's particularly for this second reason why the ADSP shouldn't be elected back in. A party with a PP that doesn't want all of eAustralia in eAustralian hands can hardly truly represent our interests.
Comments
br0ad isnt ADSP PP m8.
I think it's time to stop the flaming, you stopped for a week or so and now the war is back, just give it a rest.
"THE ADSP PP (Br0adside) and other ADSP members have attacked me claiming that the Q1 food situation is due to a lack of workers."
Br0adside is not PP, his not a cabinet and his not a senate, his only a Party member and therefore his a citizen ONLY.
"At the time of the comments (last night), there was only one Q1 food eBusiness seeking workers, eRadicate Foods. The number of employees it had, 10. As such it's clear that the current situation isn't caused by a labour shortage."
eRadicate Foods has 4 workers who have left the game.
I get tried of both br0adside and Icey1174 starting their crap when there are serious issues we should be discussing . I know both of them , and they both laugh about it and say its great fun . Give us all a break .
Bilbarus
The whole article is ruined because of one missed fact.
- Broadside isn't PP.
Its rather disappointing that one goes through all that effort of fiction and lies, Just so they can end up making the wrong assumption.
____
While were on the Suject, could you tell me why you strongly opposed the companies lowering the Q1 Prices for New Players?
eAustralia needs new citizens and I will not let you attack our next generation.
First i would just like to say good luck in the Congress elections, i hope you get it. 🙂
ADSP has been a very good party in congress, there has been many ups and downs but they have done a great job.
But in next elections citizens VOTE TRUE BLUE PARTY!!
Heheh.. Political Propoganda !!
TBP = Tasmanian Bundaberg Pansies
ACP = Almost Cool Party
ADSP = Awesome, Deadly, Super People
AIP = All Insomnia Patients
ANP = Ally's Nose Pickers
😃
That was an excellent article AW, Keep it up! 😛
Damn right there are some serious issues to discuss. We were told recently by the eGovt that the problem was the grain suppliers. "Don't buy any grain until the drop their prices".
Well, the evil grain growers have dropped their prices by around 45% and surely we have a flood of Q1 food coming to market? No?
So, now we have grain growers with lower than sustainable prices, still not able to move any stock, and no Q1 food on the market.
If any party is to get votes in the next elections they need to move away from blaming ridiculous single issues and offer steps and plans to get our econmy moving. If we need to offer guidelines on which industries need new companies, which need less, which need workers and so on, then it needs to be done. Everyone knows it's not a simple task, but if you're not up for it - don't run for office...
Forgot about the election yesterday (or the day before).
@Tim : The flaming by others have been going on for days (again). I was going to ask whether you hadn't read articles in eAus news however I noticed that you've been commenting in them & as such you can't claim ignorance.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
@HG : I expect instability in the eAustralian economy until we regain all of our territories.
""THE ADSP PP (Br0adside) and other ADSP members have attacked me claiming that the Q1 food situation is due to a lack of workers.""
Im not PP and It was only me, stop trying to dirty the ADSP.
""news back into the gutter with flaming sessions (not the only one granted).""
Just because I showed you up infront of everyone doesnt mean you need to create your own lies and accuse me of flaming you, as much as I'd like to.
""The second thing Br0ad did was argue that returning occupied territories to eAustralia was bad. This is a continuing theme, that eIndonesia should keep occupied territories as a "permanent gift", that they're good for eIndonesia & bad for eAustralia.""
Icey and you have so many things in common its almost not funny 😛 The fact is wether you would like to hear it or not (because as usual you'll just ignore it), is the increase in regions will increase our alrdy under populated countries chances of PTO and increase the worker shortage.
We are suffering worker shortages wether youd like to hear it or not m8, but you wouldnt know any of this because your never in eAustralia long enough.
hmm you do know half the cabinet is TBP?
True Blue Party ROCKS!
A PTO of the PM's position is just as likely, no matter how many regions we have. And if you're worried about a Senate take-over, well all we need to do is concentrate the population in a couple of territories in order to win at least 50% of the seats. Also if a PTO was likely we could do a call-out to e😜ats and friendly nations for help destroying the PTO.
Also by having more of OUR regions back i think you'll increase the appeal in the game to newer players, making it more likely they'll hang around and it should also bring some e😜ats back (in combination with the war games). I'm not saying we should rush the Indonesians, after all we have recently just settled on a new agreement thanks to Patti, but i'd like to see BOTH sides sticking to that agreement.
I can definetely see that further improvements to our government, economy and indeed our manners could be achieved. However i don't believe one party has "all" the answers and i'd suggest that all citizens vote for the PEOPLE they think will make a positive influence to the government, whether they're old hats, or budding new talents. As a nation, we can move forward!!
that was a great post rambo 🙂
Thanks Br0ad 😃
@SOR : It's good to have different viewpoints however there's two things that are a must.
1 : People need to be capable of discussing different ideas like adults. When you have certain people that regards any view not in allign with their own to be that of idiots & only deserving of flaming, then you have a problem.
2 : When you have people that prefer to have any eAustralian territories in the hands of another eNation then they ain't interested in eAustralia's interests.
@AW - nicely argued, but the worker shortage is very real. Several food companies have *no* workers, they're not trying to get workers because they won't get enough to become profitable. Consider the following:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/q2-food-1-license-50g--134401" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/q2-f[..]4401
http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/people-s-food-182958" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/peop[..]2958
http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/southern-star-food-186137" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/sout[..]6137
http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/orobas-187110" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/orob[..]7110
http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/goode-food-s-187732" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/company/good[..]7732
The worker shortage isn't the cause of eAus' economic problems, but it will make things worse, and more so in the future.
@AW - I was actually arguing for the return of ALL australian territories. Just it's economically irresponsible to try and grab them all at once, not to mention (though i will) a political nightmare... I was just arguing that a possibility of a PTO should not stop us regaining our territories in the timeframe recently agreed to by the eAus & eIndo governments. This is because with the right strategy, any PTO attempt could be stopped by an organised australian 'defence' (for lack of a better word), and we could be assisted by ally's as other smaller nations have done in recent history.
Also as you said AW, people do need to be able to discuss different ideas as adults. That's what i thought i was doing by adding the comments i did. I presented my view on the subject and people can either agree with it, or they could disagree (hopefully in an adult manner, which so far seems to have happened).
'TBP = Tasmanian Bundaberg Pansies'
Bundaberg is in Queensland Pred 😛
@AW: "1 : People need to be capable of discussing different ideas like adults. When you have certain people that regards any view not in allign with their own to be that of idiots & only deserving of flaming, then you have a problem."
And your going to take your own advise when exactly? You are well known for creating articles that simply flame individuals and the Government in the hope of getting adverse reactions AW. When people try to explain things calmly to you, you attack them personally or completely ignore what they are saying, then decide to Misquote them on a regular basis. When you starting doing what you suggest yourself, maybe other will as well with you.
@SOR : My points was supposed to be directed at some other people, not yourself. I apologise if you believed that they were directed at you.
@Xavier : There is no misquote. You just hate to see people showing some of the things that you say.
@AW: I'm disappointed, I would have expected better from a member of the TBP 😉
@AW: "@Xavier : There is no misquote. You just hate to see people showing some of the things that you say."
I'm alot older and alot wiser than you young man, I have a very long memory and pretty well remember everything I say / write. And I've already warned you about Misquoting me and others have seen it. You can't worm your way out of this accurate fact about you, so don't even try, you will just make yourself look even worse.
""Bundaberg is in Queensland Pred 😛""
This is the same guy that said ballarat is in NSW Cheese 😃
@Xavier : Your memory mustn't be the best.
As a food company owner and one that's prepared to sell at reasonable prices, I'll tell you this.
Food companies are usually marginal - this is like BHP and Rio last year with China's boom demand - a once of opportunity to make some profit.
So 1) I am buying up stock of grain just because these prices are unsustainable
and 2) I want to get as much produced as possible so I will pay what it takes to get new workers and work with them to keep them in the game.
and 3) I put food into the market and it get's snaffled by some shifty operators that I expect are then reselling the same food at higher prices.
Scorpion Stinger raises a good point - quite regularly, any reasonably priced Q1 food is snaffled up by the markets.
Can I ask a hypothetical question - there has been some discussion before about perhaps an evolving role for Centrelink not necessarily in gifting, but in ensuring there is cheap q1 food on the market for new players. Is this worth exploring? I know some people decry the involvement of government in business, but if this is a supply issue that is costing us new players, how chould government best intervene to address this? At the moment it doesn't seem to be being addressed through the notion of letting business regulate itself?
Honest question - over to you...
@AW: "@Xavier : Your memory mustn't be the best."
My memory is perfect AW, its just a problem you have with misquoting me and others here, you know you do it, so does everybody else that has read your articles.
love ya XG 🙂
Fully quoting you ain't a misquote.