PLATO GIVE MY 6th ROCKET [updated]
faucoult
If you purchase something and the seller says u can take 1 more as a gift than u receive
1+1 not 1x1
If u watch a film and then watch "one time more" in total how many times have u watched the film ?
then
1+5= 6
link
so PLATO must give 6 rockets not 5.
HERE IS THE VIDEO OF THE BUG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-u5WLJ9Yk4
faucoult
chain shout
PLATO GIVE MY 6th ROCKET
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-2317977/1/20
Comments
pirinç
FAUCOULT GIVE MY 1st
saldım roket yparsın xd
vote 🙁
kanky ne yani 1 pakete 5 roket mi ?
evet bir pakete 5 roket veriyor
oha adam haklı 😃 fail platoç
It clearly says 5 TIMES more, not 5 extra. If you purchase something and they tell you that you can have another one as a gift they don't say "You can have 1 times more", they say "You can have one extra".
Stop being silly.
If u watch a film and then watch "one time more" in total how many times have u watched the film ?
If I watch a movie and watch it ONE MORE TIME, not one time more. There is a huge difference, there is also a huge difference in the examples. 5 times more = 5*x, x in this case is 1, 5*1 = 5.
then what s the meanng of "more"
Uh, more indicates that there is an increase, not how that increase is produced. The "times" means that it's multiplication.
what if Plato told "1 TIMES MORE" NOT 5
Then Plato's English would suck, as that is not a proper way to write it.
yes i got u, hit me baby one more time
I might suck at math but for me 1x5=5 not 1x5=6. But that's just simple'o'me
Again, one more time does is not the same as one time more.
One more time = Doing something one more time.
One time more is not a sentence, you can't write that.
Watch this one time more 🙂
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-u5WLJ9Yk4
Dude, you don't know English well and that's ok. But you don't need to write articles and show to everyone how poor is your knowledge of English. "One time more" is a construction that doesn't exist, maybe only in your native language. Be well and read a book. It helps.
Who is Plato, maybe you mean Pinocchio?
Also got to say, please remove the "A beautiful mind" pictures, I don't want you to taint such a great movie and sad story with this terrible math. You can't even do the basics, you got no right to use pictures of someone representing John Nash.
I am lost son of John Nash xd
pirinç
Plato said you'll produce 5 times more, not that he'll give you 5 times more bonus rackets.
And if f I'm producing 5 times more rockets than in the past it means 5x, not (5+1)x.
Also 5 times more it's very different than 5 more times. Not to mention one time(s) more doesn't make any sense in English.
So learn English before making ridiculous arguments.
Ok if he said 1 time more what would we get?
a blabbering person, as 1 time more doesn't make any sense in English.
u see
But 5 times more does make sense, so I see. You don't.
1+1=0
(1+5^2 - 16/4) / (4/2) -(24/4) = 5 !!!!
You build 1 rocket and get 5 rockets in total.
ooo.. hold on buddy.. you're getting the author of this fine article confused!!
It is 5 times more: 1 x 5 = 5
not 5 more...
v
It is feature of the game for your benefit. 🙂
Have a nice day ahead.
-=V=-
A future economist, no doubt.
this guy is "mal degnegi", so don't bother.
mal hesap satın alıp artistlik mi yapıyon
fsdkjfhksjdhf mal degnegi oldugunu kanitladin bebe
Great update; It just keeps getting better mate!
thanks
hey, you're fighting them big ones here, keep up the good work. o7
Nice update, but read the whole page. There are some people that think like you do, but overwhelmingly the majority agree that "# x more" is strictly a factor and not to be added to the "one you already had."
From the site you sourced, read this:
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/30060/is-four-times-more-grammatically-correct-and-if-so-what-precisely-does-it-m?lq=1
ProTip: Just cause it IS on the internet does not make it defacto truth.
thanks
Still, 6 rockets would be better than 5, so keep up the good fight!
I have read it that source BUT, the thing in faucoult's question in that the base of calculation is to be added or not to the result (which is truly correct to be 5).
So, should we have only 5 (just the math result of multiplying of the base reference), or should we have 6 (as a result of adding the base to the math result)???
My personal point of view is that, in logical parameters, is that the sense of the affirmation of PLATO is wrongly overlaid on mathematical logic's.
For this reason, it should be written: 4 more rockets instead of 5 times more.
Hahaha
You are like a chil😛"na na na na I am right everyone else is wrong nnnananna I can't hear you" 😛
na na na naaaaaaaaa xd
kids
useless and embarrassing post, I would straight up delete this after consulting the dictionary "one times more"
)))))