OG: Media Moguls
Day 492, 00:37
•
Published in Canada 
•
by
•
by SATZU
When V1 came the media became jungle, everyone saw the media mogul medal on their profile (gray). Many writers wanted to earn that medal to be one of the very few to achieve this. The thing has changed a lot after that. Nowadays not many writers care about that medal because 25 papers already have it and 2 papers have 2 of those. It is not so special anymore which has made the media calm down a little. There was a time when you can read from any big countries media “1 USD for vote and sub” etc.
But heres the fun part
From those 25 papers 14 are from Hungary and top 7 is fully Hungarian, are those people just subscribing to any paper or what is the meaning of the subscribers on these papers.
Hungary became strong only in one month, now it is one of the strongest countries in eWorld and it has the power over media, with those subscribers they can dominate any media they want.
Not all of those media moguls are really good writers, some of them have paid for the subscribers, is that earned?
Sincerely,
SuicideOG
Media spammer
Edite
😛wrong type of sentence
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
"Not many of those media moguls are really good writers, usually they have paid for the subscribers, is that earned?"
This is false. One good article is enough for 20 new subscribers and they will not unsubscribe. Show me only one example, when a mogul paid for a new subscriber.
@TigerEye: Sorry for wrong sentence, it should have been not all of those media moguls, some of them have paid...
@TigerEye: and I saw many "money for sub" articles after V1, You didnt see any?
No, I didn't. I am 3 weeks old.
Show me a paper in the international media, that is hungarian, and has payed for his cutomers.
Did you read those papers, or you just counted them? 99% of those papers are about internal affairs. Yes, we like to talk about things, to discuss most of them. The fact that all of our top 5 goes into international is the result of the "Vote race" to get into the HUNGARIAN top 5.
There was a discussion to change the way international media works. I would be the happiest to see implementing such things. Like, if you publish a paper, you would have to determine whether it goes into international or not. And of course if it goes into the market of world, then the publisher has to translate it into english.
TigerEye maybe you shouldn't be so quick to point out things you don't know
First judge:
1) Grammar: 3/5 – Several errors in grammar and syntax.
2) Persuasiveness/Veracity/Humorous Appeal: 6.5/10 – A rather controversial topic with little beyond conjecture to back up the premise of the article.
3) Creativeness/Originality: 6.5/10 – The article is unoriginal but the picture helps to balance that out a bit.
16/25
Second judge:
) Grammar/Stylistics: 3/5
Improper tenses, missing words, and syntax errors make for a rougher read.
2) Persuasiveness/Veracity/Humourous Appeal: 6.5/10
Doesn't provide many points, or evidence, to back up the statements presented
3) Creativeness/Originality: 6.5/10
Mediocre and could have been expanded
Total 16/25
Final Total: 32/50