New Challenger for Grease for Party President ( Korea Today Reported)
Day 1,117, 05:25
•
Published in South Korea 
•
by
•
by Takahashi faiz
Jeju Reported
A new challenger who will competed with Grease for Sin-gan Association party preseidential election that will be held 15th December 2010 (Wednesday). Takahashi Faiz who were Sin-gan Association party member and he is also a director of Korea Today News who challenge Grease for party president election, however this competition will not affect the relationship between the two candidates in order to maintain harmony in the party.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
You will lose.
And not because you are not capable of leading the party, I am sure you are, but because Grease has "the armada" by his side.
Good luck anyway.
voted
Cheer up !
i wish you luck but you have 0% for your victory because of grease has many multies
로마니안새 ㄱ기덜 다죽어버리면 좋겠구먼
voted.
These accusations of multies without proof are delicious.
These accusations of multies without proof are delicious. x2
Actually, the proof lies in the fact that he always has tens of votes canceled out.
But of course, some of them pass.
Tens of votes?
More like 10 or 11, then again, Clopoyaur had several multies the past election vote for him, does that mean that he uses "tens of multies" as well?
We both obviously know that he doesn't, and thus reasonably we can also conclude that Grease does not either. And if he does, he would/should have been banned by now.
@stefanzor You can claim such 'fact' as proof of existence of the 'slave electorate' with its master, and i think everyone should agree that they must crush slavery and end this for good, even if it means total annihilation of the current leadership of this administration.
Problem is, no body knows who has real mastery of a certain slave electorate, except admins. Only one thing is clear - Someone has multi-account, we don't know who is that.
What we, well educated koreans has learned from elementary school is that you shouldn't accuse anyone for using multi-account, committing adultery, being an alien host, anything without proof, like i can't accuse whole romanian leaderships for being 20th century communimperialist, for being romanitards, and for being ill-educated without clear proof.
I remember back when the Laws let us persecute people for accusations without proof. If that law was still in place I expect half this country would be banned already. :/
Here: http://www.erep.cc/elections/president?d=201012&country=47
Look at the timeline, and between 8:40 and 9:05 you'll see that Grease got 5 votes canceled. Those were 5 accounts that WE reported and got banned immediately. Not to mention the final votes that were cut off.
Let's take a look at another election: http://www.erep.cc/elections/president?d=201011&country=47 , 18 votes cut off on the final counting.
Why he hasn't been banned already? Because there is no exact proof that he directly used those clones, but if you are not stupid then you must see that he is involved in this. But of course, when you refuse to see the truth, no proof is enough.
Now, how many accounts that you know voted for Clopoyaur have you reported and got banned? None, of course.
You still can't prove decisively that they voted for Grease, all you have is circumstantial "beating around the bush" evidence.
Plus, several of Clopoyaur's votes got canceled, does that mean that he used clones like Grease did?