Memo to Anarchists: You're Doing It Wrong!
Arjay Phoenician III
You’re counted as a reader. You might as well vote!
There have always been groups out there, roaming the eRepublik landscape, seeking to tear down what the good people of the world try to build up. They PTO recklessly, believing their existence should be thanked, because, without them, this game would be no fun. It is more enjoyable to destroy than to create, and they go out and try to prove it. They believe in chaos. They talk trash. They oppose because they oppose and can give no better reason than that.
They call themselves anarchists. They create parties and units to organize themselves. They post crazed pictures. They come up with catchy slogans and take more time developing their name anagram than a reason for being. They truly believe they are the anti-force in this world, the yin versus the established yang. They invest so much time in deception at first and then bravado after. They hope you’ll wake up one day, come to work and train and fight, but instead of your national flag waving above you, there will be a screen, all of them laughing at you.
I’m here to tell you, anarchists, you’re doing it all wrong.
First of all, anarchists by definition seek a society with no government. They believe bureaucracy is unnecessary, is in conflict with personal freedom, and should be dismantled. They envision a world where we are liberated from state obligations and can create something for ourselves without having to pledge allegiance to anything higher than our own beings.
That’s not what you want, is it? You don’t want a world without government. You merely seek to seize control of that government, to make it serve your own purposes. You want power just as bad as anyone else does. You just want to replace THEIR order with YOUR order. You want CP and Congress medals just as bad as those in the country you’re trying to PTO. However you wish to steer the ship after that, that’s your call, but instead of dashing the government into the rocks for its own joy, you loot the treasury, you hoist your own flag, and you rule.
That is not anarchy. That is merely organized opposition.
Second, anarchists are individualistic. They don’t organize and create their own bureaucracies and pseudo-societies. They believe the singular person is smarter than any government clerk and can follow his own lead. The smallest indivisible part of any human endeavor, be it a country or a party or even a family, is the individual, and they are willing to rise and fall on the belief that he is intelligent enough to live his life on his own terms. Yes, there is a general anarchist “culture”, but it’s not based on someone at the top demanding his minions wear this or pierce that.
Game “anarchists”, on the other hand, are really big on symbolism and organization, just like any other party or unit in the game. They have their internal structures, usually they gather at a forum or IRC somewhere to plan their next caper, they have leaders who direct their underlings, just like every other organization here. Also, just like everybody else, they rely on the sworn loyalty of their members, needing them to give up significant portions of their personal freedom and identity in order to pull off their next stunt. Even if you dummy such a group down and call them a “team”, the very notion of a team flies in the face of what anarchy is supposed to be, because true anarchists appreciate the precious nature of the one. In many cases, they use their group logo, their corporate stamp, as their avatars, wiping out the last vestiges of their individuality.
And third, real anarchists summarily reject groupthink. In the early 20th century, anarchists were staunchly opposed to fascism. Later, their target was communism, and even today, anytime the government tries to install a new program or enforce a law, even if it could benefit society, you get the anarchists stepping up and calling any overreach of the government, left or right, an evil.
In contrast, how many so-called anarchist groups have we seen in this world that glorify Nazi imagery?
How many PTO groups pledge allegiance to another country, whether or not that country sanctions them? How many wave their national banners? Provided they’re stupid enough to come out of the shadows early, how many have talked trash about how their motherland will win the day? They subscribe to the groupthink of their chosen homeland and believe themselves to be an extension. Such thinking makes them tools for government, which is the complete opposite of true anarchy.
I understand that “game anarchy” developed as a party description, and the choice of “anarchy” is supposed to bring with it an aura of subcultural undercurrents and a loathing of the status quo. Such a party seeks to draw in members who believe the national elite need to be knocked down a peg or two. It is designed to fill members with the hope of activity, but in reality, it gives them false street cred. “Game anarchy” is not true anarchy, anymore than any other game element truly mirrors its real-world counterpart.
But this world has been around long enough, can’t these punks name themselves something a little more accurate to what they’re actually doing? Can’t WE just take it upon ourselves and call them what they really are, instead of glorifying them with a very real and credible social philosophy some human beings truly believe? Me, I like the word “punk”. Probably something more precise is “tool”; it’s close enough to the word “troll” to give you a sense of their social maturity, but it also reveals their dimwitted usefulness to others.
Truly, if you’re in one of these groups, if you pound your chest because you claim to be an “anarchist”, stop what you’re doing. You’re making a complete fool of yourself (“fool = “tool”). You’re mocking the real-world concept of the word. All you did was find another lame crowd to follow. Instead of taking orders from the MoFA, you take orders from a guy who could have been MoFA if he applied himself. Whatever it is inside you that makes you unique and precious and a potential asset to the world, you not only smother it in groupthink, you kill it by giving up any semblance of identity. You give your time, your energy, your wealth, your shouts, your newspaper, your credibility, your reputation to your hierarchy, and it’s all wasted, because you don’t even know what real anarchy is.
I’m not telling you to stop what you’re doing. If you really believe PTOing a small, struggling nation and plundering their treasury is fun, knock yourself out. If you think burrowing into a country’s social fabric and becoming a sleeper cell is worth the time and trouble and will give you a big payoff when your leaders finally tell you to blow yourself up, terrific. I’m not going to tell you to stop acting like a punk if you truly believe that is the best way you can play this game.
Just do me a favor. Stop calling yourself an anarchist. You’re not an anarchist. You’re a punk.
Belfast Lough Times: Issue #22
Comments
I would have read it but no one tells me what to do!
lol No I read it. You make a very good point. I like the "punk" label.
I pick "punk" because "tool" might be too cerebral for them.
Thanks for telling the truth, and expressing it so clearly. Too bad the "anarchists" won't listen.
Anarchy lead to nothing positive
You mean chaos?
Anarchy 😕= Chaos
"The more enlightened man will become, the less he will employ compulsion and coercion. The really civilized man will divest himself of all fear and authority. He will rise from the dust and stand erect: he will bow to no tsar either in heaven or on earth. He will become fully human when he will scorn to rule and refuse to be ruled. He will be truly free only when there shall be no more masters.
Anarchism is the ideal of such a condition; of a society without force and compulsion, where all men shall be equals, and live in freedom, peace, and harmony.
The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government, because government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion.
Anarchy therefore does not mean disorder and chaos, as you thought before. On the contrary, it is the very reverse of it; it means no government, which is freedom and liberty. Disorder is the child of authority and compulsion. Liberty is the mother of order."
-- Alexander Berkman, in "Is Anarchism Violence?" in ABC of Anarchism (1929)
Berkman knew what he was talking about. Definitely an underrated figure.
I was trying to point that.... 😁 anarchy as synonim of chaos and Anarchy ( with a big A in the begining) arent the same thing. Happens the same with democracy, socialist, liberal... Words meaning diferent thing according to who, where and when use the term....
For the most I agree with your article, but many (maybe even most) anarchists do organize.
My motto: Without organisation there is no anarchism, only anarchy.
Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
However my disagreements with you, I do agree with your conclusion that anarchist who PTO nations to get the CP and congress medals and plunder the state coffins are punks.
Organization sound too vertical and hierarchized... Maybe choosing another term? Coordination? Tha sounds more horizontal....
As a RL Anarchocapitalist/Agorist voted hard!
Subscribed and shouted!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccUR7nbvAEM
ROTFLMAO!!!
You're so right, Coercion based on capital is far more agreeable than coercion based on votes! Why did I never reali... oh nvm. : P
Capital causes coercion as much as flies cause crap. It is what one does with the capital that determines whether coercion takes place. In any voluntary exchange you have a willing buyer and a willing seller. When either party is no longer "willing", the exchange is no longer voluntary and any anarchocapitalist would encourage that unwilling party to walk away.
capital produce coercion because natural resources r not unlimited. and capitalist hoarding is unlimited. or at least intends to be.
[removed]
That implies that every transaction is done willingly. Which it isn't. capitalism by it's very nature promotes a coercive hierarchical structure. Bosses will forever be trying to under value of labour and so from the very basics the majority people will be forced to either; work a job that has an already unfair exchange taking place and be subservient to someone who's authority over them is based on wealth, or to starve.
Combining that with an ideology that has it's entire basis founded on a belief that hierarchical relationships are always abusive and to be opposed is just a huge oxymoron.
Anarcho-capitalism has nothing anarchist about it, It's just capitalism unleashed.
You're referring to relationships that are currently occurring in a heavily regulated and therefore uncompetitive market -- a market where the government has created barriers to entry to stifle competition, allows the creation of fictional persons called corporations to limit their liability, which makes it possible for larger companies to benefit through "scale" and thus reduce the demand for labor.
You are looking at a system where the majority of ones earnings are taken away from them at the point of a gun and redistributed to the friends of those in power, again reducing the demand for a system of labor where employers compete for the best employees.
You are also looking at a current system where subsidies and regulations exist to benefit one industry at the expense of another and therefore stifle innovation and therefore stifles the flow of money across the marketplace.
Don't look at multiple countries where their individuals and businesses are regulated by hundreds of volumes of regulations and claim that is capitalism unleashed -- more like Fascism.
to anarchocapitalist: u is doing it wrong!!
There's been a couple of people come up to me from the ILP, asking if I'm writing about them. Specifically, no, I am not. I am criticizing what passes in this game for anarchy and noting it has no resemblance at all with the real thing, and if you're one of these knuckleheads who trolls forums and plays PTO games in the name of anarchy, just stop. You're not an anarchist, so stop insulting people who know the difference.
any gvt deserve to get PTOed
Replacing one set of elite losers with a new set of elite losers is not anarchy.
correct. but removing both sets of losers from the trough is more like it.
true but that's not possible in game. Only in RL (at some point in the future one hopes)
but inactive CP is possible in game
Game anarchists are acting more like pirates with their PTO nonsense.
AARRRRRRRRGH
*narrow stare* Don't insult the pirates pls.
[removed]
Nice.
Establishment PTOer anarchists and pro-Serbian fifth column PTOer anarchists are about to have a field day in the eUS on PP election day.
Yeah, I've been reading stewy's newspaper lately. It's going to be interesting, the eUS is PISSED OFF about "unity", and this guy is in the middle of it. He's taking RGR head-on.
I ought to write about the necessity for a deportation option. My concept would reduce the threat of PTO's. It would open up a whole nother can of worms, which would make things interesting in a different way, but at least you'd be able to ship the Gipp to Serbia where his buddies are.
Am I the only one who is both totally anti-Bruno and totally anti the undemocratic means used to oppose him while simultaneously suppressing the rest of the democratic rights of eUS citizens?
Apparently it's a really big thing this month.
Social anarchism. That defeats all your points against individualist anarchism.
But I'm not talking about social anarchism, am I? Where in this article did I mention once anything about social anarchism?
Try again.
I assumed you meant anarchism as in the general ideology, which has many different sub-ideologies within it. Not all are individualist, not all do form organizations but there do exist collective based on positive liberty.
[removed]
An excellent point. No, this is about the good, old-fashioned anarchy you find in most dictionaries, the kind people have some idea about.
Voted for the Greek photo xD
Great article and good to see so many discussion.
Without Faith all your isms......capitalism, socialism, anarchism...they are just empty idea that will never work in reality coz of corruption of your souls.....
Not matter what ism humans belive they will always try to get position, property through that ism and false respect from other humans
That will never change coz without Faith in Heavens humans are nothing more but an empty shell deperate to fill that empty feeling with corporeal values......and that will never fill your soul
As State Prior and Cleric of The Word i bless this article with a holy vote in hope The Word will illuminate your wretched souls...
voted, good article!
All "isms" are closed-minded in their own way. That is the nature of systematic thought. Anarchism is no exception.
Good article, though. Definitely one of the more interesting philosophies out there.
Bunch of hippies.
fock hippies
Mike Bane is gonna love u
Anarchy - in some definitions - is opposition to the state, not to governance.
Good article btw. v
I believe true anarchists seek continuous revolution, much like the enlightened cycle thesis-antithesis-synthesis.