Let Us Be A Bastion Of Freedom
NeilP99
Over the past week or so there has been a growing trend in the eUS that has been getting more and more attention. More and more Americans have been leaving the eUS for other countries. Perhaps the most noticeable of these citizens was former president Uncle Sam leaving for Latvia, but he is far from the first to leave his native home. John Jay left after his election loss, Jamarcus is now leaving for Lithuania, there were rumors that PrincessMedyPi was going to leave for Finland, Wade Seagrave just announced he would be leaving on the eUS forum, and Rhane is already gone. Even the famous (Or infamous) Michael Lewis left America for some time, though he now says that he will be coming back. These citizens aren’t any John or Jane Doe, they’re some of our nation’s best. Many of them ran for president or had been mentioned as possible presidential candidates in next month’s election. Now it’s easy to say that they just left because they got bored, and for some of them that may be true, but the interesting thing is where they left the eUS for. These citizens didn’t move to more powerful countries like Romania or Indonesia, they left for small countries that are potentially vulnerable to both military conquest and political takeover. I believe that their selection of counties could make an important point for future eUS foreign policy.
Increasingly I have noticed that not only in the eUS but in almost every eCountry people are speaking out against political takeovers and bullying smaller nations. Now obviously it isn’t always a majority of people in any country but it usually seems to be a significant number of people. They express their outrage that just because a nation has more citizens they are able to take away the freedom of their smaller neighbors through underhanded tricks. They’re right to feel this way. In my mind this is the single biggest problem that the Admins need to fix. But now let’s look at it from a nationalism standpoint. If citizens in Romania and Indonesia and other powerful nations feel that their government is doing the wrong thing by taking over smaller countries, whatever the means being used are, how can America benefit from this?
Let Us Be A Bastion For Freedom
I have often called on the eUS to take more steps to uphold the ideals that real life America is supposed to stand for. Freedom, independence, tolerance for all, and justice are at the heart of the American story, and while we may not have always held true to these ideals they are nonetheless what many Americans think of when they think of what it means to be an American. I believe that it is for that very reason that we now see so many prominent eAmericans leaving our shores to go and fight for those very ideals in other countries. But what if they didn’t have to leave our shores? What if, instead of leaving America to fight for the American ideals, people were drawn to America?
Growing an active population is always priority number one for a government in eRepublik. By establishing ourselves as the country that stands against political takeovers and the ruthless conquest of small defenseless nations we could draw in hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of citizens from all over the world. In addition to the potential for population growth we would undoubtedly gain in our opportunity for war. Signing MPPs with small nations who are under constant threat of invasion is bound to lead to more wars for America. These wars would help our citizens gain experience and increase their military rank, not to mention be tremendously helpful for our economy.
Now I know that what I’m proposing has its problems, however, I feel that the benefits outweigh the costs. So I call on the American people to support this idea. Let us become the bastion of freedom that our eWorld needs so badly. Let us take a stand against the practices of those who wish only to increase their own power. Let us show the eWorld that America stands up for the ideals that we associate with our nation. I say this not only because I believe it is the right thing to do, but also because I can see how it would benefit our country. So I call on our leaders to consider a new foreign policy. Rather than blindly following the Romanian dominated Atlantis alliance I suggest we make up our own minds and find those nations that deserve to be free and able to decide their own government and we support them. At worst we fail and the eWorld continues as it is now, at best we not only send the message that we do believe in the time honored American ideals, but we implement them to protect those who cannot protect themselves. Thank you for reading.
Comments
i agree
eAmerica should protecet not fight we could draw hundreds of people
A noble sentiment, Neil. But the eUSA already actively sends mobile voters to counter PTO's. But I think your article fails to dsitinguish between "militaristic" PTO's that are organizied and executed by nation-states for the purpose of conquest, those organized by nation-states to raid a foreign treasury and those that are organized by rogue non-state groups for the purpose of raiding treasuries.
The first, I believe to be a legitimate weapon of war in the eRepublik. These are usually organized to attack a nation that is already hostile to the sponsoring entity.
The second and third type are directed at weak nations, especially newly introduced nations, are I think are counter-productive to the development of the game as a whole. Why the Admins have not introduced citizenship, I can't fathom. Citizenship would not eliminate the legitimate PTO in category 1, but would make it more difficult while also hampering and diminishing the effects of categories 2 and 3.
As for why citizens choose to live in another country, I remember that you recently went globe-trotting yourself. The eUSA is massively large. Our Congress is unweildy in size. We have so many countervailing points of view that political conflict is inevitable. Some people thrive on this. See it as a challenge. Others grow weary of it. It is natural. But to think that players from around the eWorld will flock to the eUSA because of our stance on PTO's I think is incorrect. There are many factors that players consider in choosing an e-home. The ease of travel and immigration makes it that much more inviting and less risky to just give it a go somewhere else. eRepublik remains a fairly consequences free environment.
Eugene Harlot
I don't mean to say that it would stop people from leaving the country Eugene, I just think that we could gain a lot of strong players who feel strongly about our cause if we adjusted our foreign policy somewhat. I also applaud our past attempts to avert PTOs, I just think that we could do more and I would like us to. As of the moment I see very little direction in our foreign policy and I think that we need to change that, this is simply my suggestion for what direction we could take.
Finale someone gets it. This is why eAmerica is not as great as we all want to think. It has serious image issues and a lack of competent leadership that realises eAmerica cannot continue down this path of losing it's best to opportunities across the open sea.
"Uncle Sam...John Jay...Rhane...they’re some of our nation’s best."
Meh, opinions vary.
@Korin: I guess I mean some of our nation's most experienced.
They were some of our nation's loudest, for sure. Other people who have also been around a long time need to step up and be louder.
I'm hoping that those that have left who are members of congress no longer have voting privleges.
Sorry for the wall of text Neil. I hope it makes sense...I have an epic headache 😃 Nice article BTW. Great idea IMHO.
Another excellent and thought provoking article Neil, voted already subscribed. @EH and Medy - I think both of your comments warrant their own article for more complete discussion.
Kudos to you again Neil for compelling, through your treatment of the topic, such outstanding and thoughtful comments!
The question is whether the smaller nations would accept.
@pyro: I can't imagine a lot of them wouldn't want MPPs with us or for us to not help them prevent PTOs. The first couple times we took action might be a little harder since we wouldn't have a reputation for doing it, but once we had a few times I think it would go smoothly.
I'd agree Ananias...but I'm not in the mood. I'm on vacation from discussing things like that for a while. I'm on ePolitical leave for a few days 😃 If I didn't take a break...I'd be insane and gone for good.
Right on, Free South Africa : )
@Ariake - Freeing S. Africa would require a commitment of troops to fight in a Resistance War in enemy-occupied regions.
"Let us take a stand against the practices of those who wish only to increase their own power."
Aren't you saying we should be gaining power in a politically correct appeasing way?
Also, I don't think we should be playing Team America World Police right now when we are having internal problems. This isn't the real US and we can't run things the way the real one does. It is a game and there is not inherent morality in a game. We need to focus on ourselves before we start becoming a rally point for weak nations, because honestly we couldn't do much to protect anything right now.
Also, someone my post got deleted before and thats why I am rewriting it. I know noone would intentionally silence me so it must be a computer error. Since it is a free ecountry and all.
Oh and Romania is our ally and personally if they do something that the game allows ie: political takeovers and the like, then why should we judge them and call it dirty and underhanded? It is how the game is designed, I'm not saying its how the game should be but that is how it is. Crying about how its underhanded does nothing cause they could care less...its a game and they are winning. Perhaps we should try to do the same.
@Perrin: While the path that I'm suggesting would increase America's power in the world I'm not suggesting it for that purpose, therefore I don't consider it one of the policies that I am opposed to in this article. Furthermore I would argue that there is morality in this game. When countries use PTOs against nations that have no way to defend themselves against them due to the lack of citizenship requirements then they are using tactics that are unfair. So is it allowed? Yes, but my guess is only because the programers didn't expect it to be a problem.
Also, I hope you're not suggesting that I did something to get your first comment deleted. I can assure you that I did not and if you are suggesting that then I feel insulted.