Jose Miguel for Congress - Peace 'n' Prosperity Party
Jose Miguel
Experience
-12 periods as congressman in eArgentina and eColombia.
-Assistant of the Minister of Government in eArgentina.
-2 terms as Minister of Education in eArgentina.
-Minister of Foreign Affairs in eColombia.
-Manager of ALA's ATO Force.
-Secretary-General of ALA.
-Second Vice President of the Congress of eArgentina.
-President of the Congress of eColombia.
-Vice President of eColombia.
-Party President (Multiple Times) in both eArgentina and eColombia.
Internal Politics
I come to eNew Zealand to begin a new life. Although I had some power in my previous country, I became tired of many aspects of eColombian politics. I came here with no loyalties or prejudices. Some people from eColombia and eLatin America have also arrived here and we have grouped together, but when I arrived, I did it alone.
Since my arrival, I've been active on the country forum and IRC Chat, having an average of 8.3 posts per day in the national forum. There, I have been respectful of the provisional government and the institutions of eNew Zealand. I have cooperated with the provisional government and given them all the active support I can. It doesn't mean I am an ally or part of the provisional government. My relation with them has been limited to a few PMs and chatting with Fionia and the provisional leader Myles Robinson. In October 26th, when I sit in the Congress, I will be independent from the government, critical when their decisions are wrong, but also friendly when their actions are good for eNew Zealanders.
I want small state with few bureaucracy. Instead of having twenty or more ministries, plus helpers and assistants, I would let our tanks and older citizens to be in the armed forces defending our nation. In fact, defense is what eNew Zealand needs right now, we require to achieve a safe state.
To reach security, we must have three elements working:
a) Armed Forces.
b) An intelligence organization.
c) Organized Anti Take-Over forces.
Economics
The game forces it's countries to have a capitalist economy. Even if the game allowed us to choose the economical model, I would keep capitalism. That doesn't mean I will work for a neoliberal country where the state is unnecessary, instead, I will work for a State that guides economy, but not controlling it. State companies are necessary, and I would like to vote "yes" for a law regarding Schools for new players when I am in the Congress. Other State companies that are necessary are gun companies that give work for our soldiers. However, I want a State where private companies have the larger part of the market, where our citizens are free to begin a new company, to buy and sell freely what they want, when they want, where they want and to who they want.
Foreign Politics
I come from a PEACE-then Phoenix background, but I don't have a loyalty for those alliances. In the Latin American context, Phoenix was the good alliance, that defended our countries, and EDEN was the alliance of polish PTOers, Spanish invaders and those who betrayed eArgentina in the past. But now I am in eNew Zealand and our situation might be different from that of the countries I come from, so I am conscious that I can't keep my old loyalties here. When the moment of choosing a side comes, I will vote for the most responsible and intelligent option.
Others
I keep my work organized in OneNote files. It will be public for all eKiwis when they ask me for it.
Comments
Latinoamericans with Jose Miguel.
Voted.
All LA with Jose Miguel, Voted 🙂
Voted!
Good luck JoseM 😉
thanks to all of you!
Quote: Latinoamericans with Jose Miguel.
Voted.
Not to be hatin' but kinda odd how if I was commenting on an campaign article, of say a white person, and I said "White people with bla bla bla" then I'd be considered racist. But if anybody else says it there just be 'cultural' or 'supportive of their community', etc, etc...
>_>
No I'm not racist.
it isn't because of race. "Latin American" is not a race. It's a common culture from 14 different countries, here we are supporting each other as this is an english-speaking country, some of us can have difficulties adapting to it, so we must support ourselves.
Race or culture, regional background, etc, etc, the same thing. Same as saying "Europeans with bla bla" or "Slavs with BLa bla bla".
In other words, is saying "Europeons support Bla bla bla" any different than saying "Whites support Bla bla bla". I don't think so; there the same thing basically.
La Rebelion with Jose Miguel
Arisocrates, so what you are saying is that one should not take pride in any group that they are in?
krcych32- No, not necessarily. I'm saying that it's ironic any single ethical, cultural group, or race, except for "white" people, can be proud of their 'group' and race/culture, without being seeing as racist.
For example, a black man can say they are proud to be black, or a latino can say they are proud to be latino, but if a white guy says "Hey, I'm proud to be white!", then he's treated by society as a racist.
I'm not saying anybody should do anything, I'm simply noting an odd idiosyncrasy of society.
And please don't literally take my words 'hey I'm proud to be white" out of context or twist them, I'm tying this into about 'latinoamericans for 'lation guy', and how if a white guy were to say White people for 'white candidate' he'd be seen as a racist, while the latino guy wouldn't be.
votado apoyado.. 😃
^He said he is proud to be white, get that racist!
As Jose pointed out, Latin American is not a race, it is a culture.
Good luck Miguel!
PnP candidates for the WIN!@
Thanks Carr! But... weren't you from the GEP?
🙂
Good luck namesake and has my support
United Latin America with Jose Miguel
Voted
Good luck Jose!
si ganas me envias unos tickets !! 😛
Race or ethnicity, discrimination is discrimination, whether we call it racism or not. Respond to the broader original question I posed.
Arisocrates, do you really want to have this conversation in this game? I see what you are saying but at the same time I think you are really overreacting. A group of people has a right to organize themselves on whatever rules they see right for them.
I'm not contesting anybodys right to anything, and I've already said that if you would of read.
The only reason I've been at it this long was to get some sort of confirmation out of one of the people retorting back at me that what I was saying had even a bit of truth to it.
I was waiting for the initial backlash to what most will see (and the liberal media want people to see) and automatically think "OMG he must be a racist or something...", to get a confirmation that what I was saying does make sense to people when they stop to pause and see through their bias that society had caused to blind them with.