Its time to do something about certain party leaderships
Day 1,044, 01:50
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by wookyjack
Yeah, that's all natural, baby.
1. Re-invigorate the FEC
2. Decrease our holding capacity of territories. Why? We're working harder than we should have to work every month by trying to fill so many seats in so many territories. Why can we not split the load with our allies?
3. Myself and other individuals believe we should make the 6th party ATO reserve voters.
4. Japan is under PTO threat. However, Japan is not the home front. That is why I think we need a foreign ATO leader and a domestic. Rod Damon is just one man running the whole show. I'm pretty sure even he isn't that great to do it all by himself...aw hell, I cannot lie, he prob can do it, but lets make it easier for him then. There are plenty of capable people who can step up and take the spot.
Rod Damon is plenty capable of helping abroad. Its been done and done very well. But we're suffering at home and are at a constant disadvantage that our enemies do not have: useless, cumbersome territories.
5. I believe I am up to the task to help our country. So is this guy.
If there was one instance where I can say I was most proud of our country it was our impeccable ability to unite as one and help our Croatian allies avoid a PTO by holding a National Primary for our own POTUS elections.
Can we step up and do it again?
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I spent some time in the sands of Pakistan and Dio spoke to me. He said I need to come back and help the USA. There will be plenty of time to sleep later.
while I can't agree on every point, and am not nearly as enthusiastic as Greek on others..
we do need to rent out more of our duplicate high resource regions-- more income plus less burden to come up with complete candidate and blocker coverage.
Rod could use some help.. as head man of the ATO operations he's been excellent and I would not expect anyone else to do as good a job, but I did not realize he was carrying the whole load alone.
Rod Damon said it here:
http://eusforum.com/index.php?topic=28803.0
I agree with most of this. We hold way too many regions to gain any traction. Also, people only looking at blockers for like a week out of the month makes them hard to organize. The parties that have more of a regular system in place (blockers that block every single month) have a better success rate.
I'm not sure about the 6th party bit, only because there aren't very many active players in 6th parties that aren't already running for Congress. 6th parties make up a decent portion of candidates on election day since they're almost as good as blockers.
ah yes let's be PROUD of throwing democracy out the window! Very American!
Yeah, you filthy Americans better not PTO Ajay's... um, I mean my 6th party spot! You dirty American PTO hacks always takin' my 6th party away from me...
I've now read we can't reduce regions further than 40 and accomplish an equivalent reduction in Congressional seats. So we may always be stuck defending 40, if I'm understandingthis correctly. That said, looking at keeping eAmerica at 40 might be a worthy goal, at this time in our history. It's strategic game mechanics.
I enjoy a mix of role-playing and game mechanics, but national security always trumps playing like this is the real United States. We want to survive and remain strong. If a kind of strategic withdrawal is possible, that's simply good game play.
Also before someone gets all upset about any reduction in Congressional seats, 40 is plenty. And a mix of older experienced players and many new faces (and with them fresh energy) has always been my broader vision for Congress. And one reason I quit running for Congress months ago, to make room for new guys.
No one wants new guys to get the chance at Congress more than me. We need to constantly be growing new leaders. But we must balance that excellent goal against strategic interests, and national security.
Vote!
Nice picture 😉
Rod Damen's pretty great, but we can all use some help at times.