Is eUK next to fall?
Christophia
Fear is mounting within eUK that an attack on its very borders is imminent. The collapse of ATLANTIS following Sweden's traitorous actions has left eUK more open to attack. Recent embarassing actions (or lack of) have made the country highly unpopular around eRepublik; the Czech coup, the Irish coup, the betrayal of Hungary and the shameful inaction regarding the Swedish-Germany conflict being examples, and anger is mounting towards the disastorous regime of Sara.Droz, and its predecessor, led by malta_1990.
But it is this very "neutrality" that may come back to bite eUK, ATLANTIS was unreliable enough at providing assistance for member states, but without even this as a backup, eUK will need to act swiftly and effectively to combat this serious threat.
With Presidential elections coming up, the eBritish people will need to think long and hard about who they want to lead them during these tough times; times that may turn out to be the most decisive the country has ever faced.
eUK has lost many allies this past month and the failure of the French war proved it cannot sustain attacks on its borders without perfected management and outside help.
These are interesting times ahead for the New World.
Comments
I agree that SaraDroz's regime is completely disasterous, but could you do a better job? and as for Malta...his regime was OK apart from the czech TO.
what was the hungarian betrayal? must have been before my time - and whos going to invade us, sweden or france? the usa would back us, and ireland would be stupid not to, as theyd be next
Whole world will fall...Just one nation will survive...
@Frank: I'm not sure that would be hard
@scotspirit: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/excl[..]1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/excl[..]1/20
USA abandoned Germany, what's to say they'd support us. Ireland - considering some eUKers TO'd them, would they really?
I think Sweden will invade France before either of them invade us. You can quote me on that.
Malta did have a pretty good term, the TO at the end was controversial.
The position Sweden put Atlantis members in was a bad one, the USA and UK had to take a neutral stance to avoid plunging the western world into war.
Germany WAS NOT a member of Atlantis.
There was a trial and after couple of months it expired. The vote for either allowing Germany to join Atlantis or not were constantly delayed by Atlantis HQ.
Therefore, you cannot say that eSweden attacked a member of an alliance.
Also, your propaganda is unbelievable. Every single article contains harsh words like 'traitorous', 'evil', 'regime'.
We, in Poland respect Germans for the brave fightings, but we do not respect their allies who abandoned them in need!
@Insurgeon
Here we go again... The Germans ARE a part of Atlantis. There is nothing in the treaty that states that once the trail is over they are kicked out etc. It just means that they are not promoted to Active member which makes policies, and remain as a passive member.
Therefore, I CAN say eSweden attacked a member of an alliance.
You are using propaganda right now trying to justify your actions. Lets say that you are right about the trail (which you are not in reality) I still fail to see invading a much weaker neutral nation (eGermany) is still ethical and justify. Regardless of how you dress it up, eSweden and ePoland invaded a innocent nation which we have relations with. I will even directly quote Kalle Holm's article 2. What are the logical reasons for this war?
1. Sweden's population, who have been declining for months due to boredom, will rise again as the game become more exciting for all players, no matter how much time they spend on the game. This will make Sweden stronger, and by that, also its allies.
2. Sweden will get further borders to hostile nations, which will strengthen Sweden’s and by that also its allies, position. I really fail to see this war is anything but a land grab. You attacked an ally but even if you refute it, it is still unjust.
As to Mr. Wordy, I think so too. Why else do they want the Rhineland even before the war?
you respected the germans enough to invade their country AFTER they fought along side you and sweden in atlantis? that is treachery.
The Swedish always use excuses, Sweden invaded a country as liberators and then betrayed the Germans.
Don't worry eUK. We're here to help.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/the-left-wing-grauniad-188736/1" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/th[..]736/1
subscribed & voted, please subscribe to my newspaper too 😃
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/quality-journalism-in-erepublik-873934/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/qual[..]/1/20