I voted YES on the peace treaty. Why, you ask?
CaptainCAPS
I, Senator from the occupied state of Oregon, voted yes to the North American Non-Agression pact.
To all of you who make your judgement here of the treaty and of the Senators and president who signed it; Go To Hell.
That being said, we can now move into some rationale for why Congress (and I), and Emerick signed this thing.
This treaty allows for us to Defend our allys. We still keep our MPPs, and ANY MPP we wish to sign. Puppets like australia, dont have that choice. With this treaty signed, we are in a better position to free canada, and fight for Spain. How could that be so? Well, because we dont have any battles being fought on our soil, we can now move our troops freely. We can now support canadian resistance wars. If we hadnt have signed this treaty, Canada would have been dead in the water.
There is also a line of logic to suggest that when we sign this treaty in game, through peace proposals, France will stop attacking Spain. France would stop attacking Spain in order to keep the U.S off the list of MPPs Spain has activated. If they do that, Spain regains initiative, and can start to push back into their country with full U.S support. Had we not signed the treaty, Spain would be gone.
Our other fallen comrade, North Korea, is not being thrown under the bus. Most North Korean citizens, before citizenship was enabled, moved away in order to get revenge. (Think post-citizenship PTO)
I hear some very hurtful lies about the U.S being like the U.K now. First off, that is complete BULL$%!T. The U.K gleefully F'd over their allies; abandoning all MPPs with Fortis, and Eden, while signing them with PEACE. The U.K willingly let Hungary and Co. use their nation as a launching pad to invade the rest of us, WITHOUT EVEN THE SLIGHTEST resistance to the idea.
Lets compare that to the U.S, now shall we?
The U.S will keep its MPP's with our allies, will NOT sign them with ANY PEACE nations, and will sign MPP's with ANY nation threatened by PEACE. The U.S will fight with those MPP's, and liberate regions our allys lost BECAUSE of the U.K. Finally, The U.S sacrificied most of its country, our country, in order to protect our allies. We gave us so much, to insure that our allies could have time; and they did the same for us. We fought it out until our fighting on the U.S was no longer doing those allies any good; and that was when the treaty was signed. We do more fighting good with an economy; versus a nation with no High material regions.
The U.K is a group of b@$$tards. The U.S is just as noble, and moreso, with this treaty signed. We are NOT puppets, and I will be the first to tell you all if I ever suspect we are coming to that.
Now the U.S can bide its time; grow stronger. And When those 4 months of North American Non Agression are over, The U.S can come roaring out of what we bought, and take back over what we fought. With all MPPS against the U.S cancelled, and FULL complete GUARENTEED initiative; we WILL prevail.
Comments
Exactly my points.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/peace-with-peace1-897128/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/peac[..]1/20
The peace treaty with PEACE may not be as bad as it seems.
We have pulled a UK in the face of our allies. We have let them down. http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/we-came-to-a-crossroads-897088/1/20#comments" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/we-c[..]ments
Woxan, go to hell. Because obviously you didnt read what was written.... you know, the whole part about how we are not the U.K.
Agreed. Voted.
Sellouts, every last one of you.
Fight with me eAmericans !!
Thanks for explaining CAPS.
You were tricked
3.I Peace proposals are to be passed through the Congress of USA, RUS, IND, PT, HUN and FRC concerning each other to where all wars will be closed if any are opened. This is to begin after the last signatory has signed this contract agreement. There is a fifteen (15) day period to pass all the agreements. Failure to meet this requirement will mean a breach of contract to any nation which rejects the peace proposal(s) in vote unless described elsewhere in this contract agreement.
-when you sign peace mpps deactivate
2.IIIA If a war is opened between the signatory via the Chain Reaction technique, the country who instigated it must send a peace proposal with 24 hours with no monetary demands attached to it.
2.IIIB If the proposal is refused three (3) times, then the country who voted it down must pay a fine of 500 GOLD to the opposing country's treasury as outlined in 5.VIIB.
-and by agreement cant't be reactivated
Shame on you eUS
That has already been talked about in congress, and the mechanics of the treaty still allow for MPPs.
CaptainCAPS, I'm sorry, but you can't convince me that surrender is a good idea right now, especially when it is coming so late and at so great a cost. This surrender feels hasty, ill-planned, and reeks of desperation. I feel like, as an American, I have fought and stuck with my country for absolutely nothing, and I cannot stand for that.
Well now, This sounds fine and dandy.
CaptainCAPS
I understand why you sign it, I also understand what you think you're signing but I don't understand how much experianced players then me you, Emerick can be so naive? For Gods sake why at least you didn't you insisit on PEACE countries signing it first?
You will have much better understanding of game mechanics and what you have signed in 2-3 weeks tops. By that time you'll know what we were talking about but you decided to send us to Hell (which I must say take pretty personaly as you will see).
p.s. Since we're allowed to read only PEACE propaganda in Hell I must unsubscribe.
I hope our Hungarian leaders will not sign this peace treaty!
Your stance changed quite drastically between this article and the last..