I pwn Scotywest Br0adside Coppr & Leon Alston
Australian Warlord
I pwn Scotywest Br0adside Coppr & Leon Alston I can do 3/4 of the damage Mouj & Taytaz does despite all of them being in this game for massively longer then I've been here (some over a year).
The reason for this article? This is in response to Cottus Arci's moronic article. Players like Scotywest are weaker than me in combat capability despite him being here for over a year.
Do something good. Become stronger than players like Scotywest in a short period of time, join us in Muntenia eRomania.
- - - - -
Cottus also went on able Q5 weapons. Let me show you a few very simple stats to show you why Q5 weapons are generally not the correct choice.
eAust Q1 = 10.5 AUD Q5 = 70 AUD
eRom Q1 = 9.4 ROM Q5 = 98 ROM
eIndon Q1 = 6 IDR Q5 = 49.5 IDR
A Q5 weapon cost between 8.5 & 9 times more than a Q1 weapon yet a Q5 weapon only does 1.6 times the damage. That means that for the same amount of money Q1 weapons does 4.3 to 4.4 times the damage as Q5 weapons.
Given this fact, despite Cottus being stronger than me, if you want to do the maximum amount of damage on a set budget then the Australian Warlord package will do more over twice the damage as the Cottus Arci package.
As such you can say that the Australian Warlord package pwns the Cottus Arci package.
Comments
'I pwn Scotywest Br0adside Coppr & Leon Alston'
no mate, they pwn you
AW:
Tell me, Have you ever been Senator? No
Have you ever been Cabinet? No
Were you ever involved in the RW? No
Did you play a Part in eAustralia's Independance? No
eRepublik is not just about War.. so..
Scotywest, Broad etc. all 'Pwn' you at eRepublik.
They have all been voted congress more then once, all held a cabinet position, I mean.. Broad is even AMC Commander.
What do you have to show? Nothing. 😉
That is what I would call 'Pwned'.
Before you ask..
Your Newspaper is a Complete Fail, It has reached various nations and yet, has only 52 subscriptions and barely reaches passed 10 Votes..
Mine? I now have a Proud 101 Subscriptions and
Average at least 20-40 Votes a Article, theres been about 3 Occassions when iv'e made 50 Votes or more..
Once Again, it is you who is 'Pwned'
Cottus Arci pwn's you and your Motley crew at your own game, as was proven before.
There is more to eRepublik then Strength, and even then you fail at that.
Mega 'Pwned'.
Read Cottus Arci article.
ehm Article Fail? Study your things b4 u write them up m8. Cottus's was good, yours is just depressing. Me thinks the pressure is getting to you?
This was the exact same type of article as Cottus's. If this is a fail then Cottus's is as well.
Guys I don't want to know whose package is bigger. On either side. I'm married with 3 kids ok?!
😛
Nuff said.
Can we please stop this pointless bickering
Both sides are as bad as eachother at the moment, right now our news is cluttered with this junk and I for one, as I am sure other are, am very sick of it.
If your going to argue, keep it civil please
@RB : We ain't talking about that type of thing (just incase you meant that - which I'm pretty sure you didn't).
I'm with RB and TBA on this and I think its said that Cottus got himself involved with this kind of thing but for the sake of the rest of us.
Please stop with the flame wars.
Scott, Br0ad, Coppr and Leon have chosen a much different path, yours simply cannot compare. They have chosen to join the politics of eAustralia, you simply fought a few times.
Anyone can fight a few times and gain strength and higher damage, but not many can become respected politicians
stop fighting. geez.
its mind numbing, just pm each other. pretend your writing news articles.
As I said, read the article Cottus wrote. He went on about the fact that I and members of ATAG weren't the strongest around & then suggested that we were losers because of that. Simple fact, if as Cottus suggests in his article, combat capability determines whether you're a loser or not, then Scoty, Br0ad etc would be bigger losers than I am.
I think Cottus was trying to get across the point that your army can't stand against Indonesia, strength is not a measure of how great you are.
I've never claimed that we can stand against eIndonesia on our own. Infact we might never be able to stand against eIndonesia on our own. However we must increase our capabilities to make us of value to defend. Also a eNation doesn't win on one or two players (which is why eAustralia's Dropbear centric policy is bad), a eNation succeeds by having many players becoming stronger.
"As I said, read the article Cottus wrote. He went on about the fact that I and members of ATAG weren't the strongest around & then suggested that we were losers because of that. Simple fact, if as Cottus suggests in his article, combat capability determines whether you're a loser or not, then Scoty, Br0ad etc would be bigger losers than I am."
Guess you should be happy he didnt use Intelligence and popularity to determine your ability as a loser aswell imo. Be glad he left it at that.
Q5 aren't worth the cost to the budget fighter...but 7 months of eRep with very little to spend money on allows Q5...not cost-effective...but they are still better
SEE, A COMMENT THAT RELATES TO THE ARTICLE
I don't understand why you need mention these 4 people in your article. I can beat your maximum damage, along with many others and I am yet to write and article saying I pwn you.
I R SO L33T LOL PWNZORZ....seriously....who bloody cares
There is no single stat the tells how good you are in this game.
Its rather, a collection of stats with the age of the person. Even then, half the stats in the damn game are bugged anyway...
End point - Stats dont mean anything, except maybe age.
@Ben P : Those four players opened their yaps in the other article attacking myself & also ATAG despite their own dismal combat capabilities.
@Alex : It's a pity that you didn't say a similar thing with Cottus's article. The fact that you only said what you said at this article which is the exact same type as Cottus's diminishes the credibility of your statement. I do admit however that I don't particularly care for the pwn word myself (but that's what Cottus said so I just copied that).
Btw, this is merely a copied response to Cottus's article. If you wish to complain about these types of articles, complain to Cottus.
if Cottus told you to jump off a cliff would you do it? Dont shift the blame on Cottus m8, take responsiblity for ur actions and man up. Dont blame ne1 else but urself and maybe ur grade 1 English Teacher.
"Those four players opened their yaps in the other article attacking myself & also ATAG despite their own dismal combat capabilities."
"good stats Cottus 😃"
Ye I h8 when saying things like that attack AW and ATAG 😛
If your talking about the other comments well thats your own fault for making that silly statement, dont blame others 😉
Combat ability means nothing, knowledge is all it takes to make a point.
@AW I didn't write it on his article because I chose to IGNORE his article, I cant see "where" I write my disapproval of him writing it as having anything to do with my "credibility" if I even have that!
I have written my own article asking both sides to stop this, I think thats enough.
@Br0ad : I'd blame your grade 1 flame instructor for that pityful flame attempt.
hehe child fight 😉
Again AW you fail dismally to portary your argument.
You do not take Wellness packages into account which are used heavily in a war. If a countries economy is strong then they can buy plenty of them and distribute them out to the players who need them + if the economy is strong the price for q5 weapons will go down so there wont be any problems about cost efficiency.
you suggest that everyone goes to Muntenia to help eAustralia and go fight there yet it seems to be (and many will likey agree) that having a strong economy which can fund wellness packages and cheap Q5 weapons is far better than having 20-30 more decent fighters.
say if Cottus were to fight say 20 times then thats 20 times the 198.44 that he can output. Thats 3968.8 (done through wellness packages)
where as you lot are still outputting 328.38
so it seems to me that Cottus is slightly ahead of you guys 😉
"@Br0ad : I'd blame your grade 1 flame instructor for that pityful flame attempt."
Lol, it was more or less a grab at humour not flaming m8, but if it hurt you then thats a bonus.
Still yet to receive a Response by AW.. So until such time..
AW:
Tell me, Have you ever been Senator? No
Have you ever been Cabinet? No
Were you ever involved in the RW? No
Did you play a Part in eAustralia's Independance? No
eRepublik is not just about War.. so..
Scotywest, Broad etc. all 'Pwn' you at eRepublik.
They have all been voted congress more then once, all held a cabinet position, I mean.. Broad is even AMC Commander.
What do you have to show? Nothing. 😉
That is what I would call 'Pwned'.
Before you ask..
Your Newspaper is a Complete Fail, It has reached various nations and yet, has only 52 subscriptions and barely reaches passed 10 Votes..
Mine? I now have a Proud 101 Subscriptions and
Average at least 20-40 Votes a Article, theres been about 3 Occassions when iv'e made 50 Votes or more..
Once Again, it is you who is 'Pwned'
Cottus Arci pwn's you and your Motley crew at your own game, as was proven before.
There is more to eRepublik then Strength, and even then you fail at that.
Mega 'Pwned'.
I love you AW!
You are so cool 😃 You think you pwn me because you have better military strength.
"players like Scotywest are weaker than me in combat capability despite him being here for over a year."
Yes but do you have:
Two terms as Minister of Industry
Two terms as Congress Member
A Q4 Food Company
A Q2 Grain Company
And are you doing?
Working in your own company
Helping the Australian economy
Working for the military companies (when i am not in my own company)
Being a member that is helping eAustralia at all
You have/are done/doing none of them points above.
Just you wait mate, JUST YOU WAIT! When i can finally get the chance to leave Australia for some war experience and i go above you! Don't forget there will be a article coming!
suck on that mate.
Petty bitching and squabling............
I love it!
@Scoty & @Pred : Cottus's article said that we're pwned simply because of military strength. You supported that argument in full. As such you both supported the argument by Cottus that pwning is based solely on combat capability. Based on this combat capability argument brought forward by Cottus, you're pwned big time.
This article is merely a copied response to Cottus's article. Firstly if you believe that this article is dumb then you to also think that the original Cottus article (which this is a copy of) is also dumb (unless you're a one eyed bigot). Secondly if you believe the the idea of pwning is simply a issue of military strength then go & argus with Cottus about it. He's the person that believes that pwning is simply a question of military strength & I merely copied it.
So in both cases argue with Cottus about it. Oh btw, Tim is still writing here with the apparent belief that pwning is based on combat capability.
- - -
@Tim : I can't speak for ATAG as I don't know who's in it, however as I've already shown, my combat package will Q1 weapons will on a set budget achieve over twice the damage as Cottus's Q5 weapons. And I noticed that you missed important math lessons with your argument (or have assess to fake gold). Lets do a little maths on your argument. Your dodgy argument with Cottus would see us spending a massive 1500 AUD on Cottus alone for one single battle. Last time I checked that's 30 gold. Just somehow I don't think that's sustainable. If any of your have a job in eAustralia that pays 30 gold per day, do let me know. Sorry Tim but it looks like it's your argument that fails.
You still haven't answered my response, try again..
Tell me, Have you ever been Senator? No
Have you ever been Cabinet? No
Were you ever involved in the RW? No
Did you play a Part in eAustralia's Independance? No
eRepublik is not just about War.. so..
Scotywest, Broad etc. all 'Pwn' you at eRepublik.
They have all been voted congress more then once, all held a cabinet position, I mean.. Broad is even AMC Commander.
What do you have to show? Nothing. 😉
That is what I would call 'Pwned'.
Before you ask..
Your Newspaper is a Complete Fail, It has reached various nations and yet, has only 52 subscriptions and barely reaches passed 10 Votes..
Mine? I now have a Proud 101 Subscriptions and
Average at least 20-40 Votes a Article, theres been about 3 Occassions when iv'e made 50 Votes or more..
Once Again, it is you who is 'Pwned'
Cottus Arci pwn's you and your Motley crew at your own game, as was proven before.
There is more to eRepublik then Strength, and even then you fail at that.
Mega 'Pwned'.
""@Scoty & @Pred : Cottus's article said that we're pwned simply because of military strength. You supported that argument in full""
why isnt my name included this time and u switch me for pred 😛 strange how when u lose a fight you feel the need to attack some1 else. Answer Pred's Post already.. atleast 1 out of the 100's.
I never attacked you, I just said that I could not get the same figures as you, using Cottus's strength. Maybe if you read things correctly, you might not get so uptight.
What is pwn?
prettymuch a fancy name for owned.
@Scoty & @Pred : Cottus's article said that we're pwned simply because of military strength. You supported that argument in full. As such you both supported the argument by Cottus that pwning is based solely on combat capability. Based on this combat capability argument brought forward by Cottus, you're pwned big time.
This article is merely a copied response to Cottus's article. Firstly if you believe that this article is dumb then you to also think that the original Cottus article (which this is a copy of) is also dumb (unless you're a one eyed bigot). Secondly if you believe the the idea of pwning is simply a issue of military strength then go & argus with Cottus about it. He's the person that believes that pwning is simply a question of military strength & I merely copied it.
So in both cases argue with Cottus about it. Oh btw, Tim is still writing here with the apparent belief that pwning is based on combat capability.
- - - - -
See two people can do stupid repeats like a parrot.
YOU'VE BEEN FIGHTING NEARLY EVERY DAY OF YOUR GODDAMN PATHETIC ELIFE! OF COURSE YOU'RE GOING TO BE BETTER AT FIGHTING THAN POLITICIANS WHO HAVE ONLY FOUGHT ONCE OR TWICE BEFORE! GET A REAL LIFE, YOUR ON EREPUBLIK FOR NEARLY EVERY HOUR OF EVERYDAY!
And Cottus said that because you're a military group, not a political group.
thanks Br0ody
@Aw.. Stop avoiding the truth..
Give me a response without shifting the attention to other people.
Tell me, Have you ever been Senator? No
Have you ever been Cabinet? No
Were you ever involved in the RW in NSW? No
Did you play a Part in eAustralia's Independance? No
eRepublik is not just about War.. so..
Scotywest, Broad etc. all 'Pwn' you at eRepublik.
They have all been voted congress more then once, all held a cabinet position, I mean.. Broad is even AMC Commander.
What do you have to show? Nothing. 😉
That is what I would call 'Pwned'.
Before you ask..
Your Newspaper is a Complete Fail, It has reached various nations and yet, has only 52 subscriptions and barely reaches passed 10 Votes..
Mine? I now have a Proud 101 Subscriptions and
Average at least 20-40 Votes a Article, theres been about 3 Occassions when iv'e made 50 Votes or more..
Once Again, it is you who is 'Pwned'
Cottus Arci pwn's you and your Motley crew at your own game, as was proven before.
There is more to eRepublik then Strength, and even then you fail at that.
Mega 'Pwned'.
lol 😉 AW ill again state you should be glad he only judged u on combat.
As for parrot, if u actually answered things people asked u to answer, you wouldnt have Pred and others repeating themselves. Stop shifting the blame on others and stop being a tantrum throwing child.
Oh shocking, somebody who's only been here for a short time isn't the most powerful player here. Who'd imagine. The fact that I'd be more useful at defending the eNation then players that's been playing for a long time (including some playing over a year) highlights why eAustralia is a pathetic mess. There's eNations with similar populations as eAustralia that's able to stand on their own two feet. The reason? Because they don't have players like Br0ad who believes that we should sit in a corner & grovel.
eAustralia can never be a secure eNation if they listen to players like Br0ad who oppose eAustralia regaining states like Western Australia. eAustralia can also never be secure if they listen to Cottus. According to Cottus, newer players should never ever make the effort to improve their capabilities in this game. If we take Cottus's logic then we should never ever have new players. And if there is new players, then they should forever sit in a corner & pay homage to those who started a year ago.
- - - -
Lets examine simple facts. I have better combat capabilities then many who's been playing for much longer. I'm passing many of them in experience points & I have much more assets in this game (including a eBusiness) then I'd have if I sat in a corner like they expect all new players to do.
Simple fact, there's absolutely no way in which taking the advice of Br0ad & Cottus is beneficial to players, not one single way. You can take their advice if you want, however you'd forever struggle to get anywhere in this game. If you struggle to get anywhere in this game then you'll never be a asset to securing any future for eAustralia. All players that want to do or value should come & join many other Australians in Muntenia eRomania.
Give me a response without shifting the attention to other people.
Tell me, Have you ever been Senator? No
Have you ever been Cabinet? No
Were you ever involved in the RW in NSW? No
Did you play a Part in eAustralia's Independance? No
eRepublik is not just about War.. so..
Scotywest, Broad etc. all 'Pwn' you at eRepublik.
They have all been voted congress more then once, all held a cabinet position, I mean.. Broad is even AMC Commander.
What do you have to show? Nothing. 😉
That is what I would call 'Pwned'.
Before you ask..
Your Newspaper is a Complete Fail, It has reached various nations and yet, has only 52 subscriptions and barely reaches passed 10 Votes..
Mine? I now have a Proud 101 Subscriptions and
Average at least 20-40 Votes a Article, theres been about 3 Occassions when iv'e made 50 Votes or more..
Once Again, it is you who is 'Pwned'
Cottus Arci pwn's you and your Motley crew at your own game, as was proven before.
There is more to eRepublik then Strength, and even then you fail at that.
Mega 'Pwned'.
Stop repeating urself u tool lol.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/atag-i-pwn-you-783609/1/all" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/atag[..]1/all
Quote Cottus Arci : "Stop wasting time with talk and procrastination.
Go to war with eIndonesia.
Now.
C'mon.. I double dare you.
I guarantee you I can 10x the damage ATAG can do combined.
Oh, but I'll be fighting for my eIndonesian brothers."
Here we see another round a idiocy. I can't speak for ATAG but I'm not about to encourage a open RW with eIndonesia. What we see is Cottus encouraging stupid actions.
Of course to do 10x the damage of ATAG, assuming that ATAG members use Q1 weapons, you'd need to fight around 80 times with Q5 weapons. That would cost somewhere around 125 gold. That's a awful lot of gold. Could you tell everybody how you aquire this gold? Do you have this gold lying around or would you take it from the eNation's treasury?
Comeon Cottus, tell us how you'd raise this gold?
Stop repeating urself u tool lol.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/atag[..]1/all" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/atag[..]/all
are u blind or do u not get the message m8?
Hey Pred, you've repeated yourself word for word about four times in this thread alone, yet alone in other threads.
Thats sortve due to you not replying to his posts m8. man the f up and reply to him.
Its quite Ironic thoe isnt it?
@AW: If you're tired of people repeating the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, then you might want to consider the following:
1. Answer a direct question.
2. Stop doing it yourself.