Free Speech Gone?

Day 548, 21:07 Published in USA USA by mcgivey

As many of you know, while in the past I was a mayor, congressperson, military leader and USWP Political Action Chairman, but over the past 6 months, I have been a very quiet eUSA citizen.

However, I recently felt compelled to comment on an article by another former statesperson in which I stated that I agree and believe that citizens of the eUSA should make their own decision and fight with an ally (or whom many of us feel is still an ally), even if our "official policy" is not to get involved on a country wide level.

In response to me expressing my opinion and using free speech, I receive this email from Eugene Harlot:

"Mcgivey, are you encouraging soldiers to ignore direct orders? Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought you were an officer in the Army. If so then I expect an explanation from you. You were given a choice to resign if you felt compelled to place Germany's interests above the US's. But inciting other soldiers to violate direct orders is something I would not expect from you."

I am a private eUSA citizen and have had no involvement in the eUSA military what-so-ever for over 6 months. First, I would like to know how I was 'given a choice to resign' if I am not a member of the military. When and whom had given me this option, I would like to know (since I am not in the Army). Second, I would like to know why military leadership would be trying to suppress my, or anyone else's, free speech. Can anyone explain to me when the eUSA leadership started to get into the "we are the leadership, you will agree with us" philosophy?

McGivey