eUnited States of America: The promised land
Day 2,044, 04:37
•
Published in Australia 
•
by
•
by Riyusaky
What's up nerds ?
As you can see, the contry that once had the most peaceful territories, the eUnited States of America is under a massive siege.I'm playing this game for a while now, so trust me when i tell you that this war represents a crucial military event, an event that’s going to change, drastically, the eWorld as we know it.I expect major changes after this war but i hope that these changes won't ruin the game for us ( the admins had that job! ).I don't think this operation against the eUSA is really fair since the americans are practically fighting alone against seven other countries but, then again it wasn't really fair either when the eUSA got 52 territoris to start with.The other members of CoT have their own wars to fight and CoT leaders don’t look like they have any idea about what’s going on. Get a grip on yourself!
I guess this war clarified once and for all the major difference in military strength between CoT and TWO.
On the other had, i must show my appreciation for TWO HQ and for TWO contries.It's been a while since i saw such a good organization inside an alliance.The timing was excellent.The strategy Hungary used was admirable.The way eSerbia, ePoland an eUK simultaneously atacked was absolutely astonishing.I’m sure that this attack on the eUSA was not only a military goal but also had the purpose of strengthening the bonds between TWO countries.I also see this operation as a test of trust and commitment and i'm glad to say that TWO countries did really good.
Gentlemen, you have my respect and admiration.
eUnited States of America two weeks ago:
eUnited States of America today:
Riyusaky, the beer whisperer
Cheers !
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
The dissolution of CoT has begun?
Yes it is a nicely coordinated campaign. But not fair? I wouldn't say so, USA insisted on COT, so don't be surprised they found themselves alone when they are in an alliance of the selfish nations. They got a lesson which they should learn this time.
I still love you USA but sometimes.... we can only learn valuable life lessons from tough love.
As we did
V+S...well co-ordinated and planned attack by TWO, lets hope we get some of that damage when we start kicking out Indonesia \o/
vote for the english
i agree, two was well prepared
.I can't help but remember the prophecy that the USA joining CoT was the beginning of the end for CoT.
Sadly the US can only see & plan short term.
Nevertheless it is important that they be supported
yes we should support those who attack them, USA betrayed us afterall
USA certainly let Australia down. it was a weak act. But the USA may well protect Ireland against the evil UK
evil UK? it was ireland that attacked the UK and now is suffering the consequences
Actually Argentina attacked the UK to commemorate the Falklands War, and got Ireland involved against their better judgement, then...
(wait for the huge surprise)
...they deserted Ireland.
Okay, maybe not a surprise.
Majester nailed it. I was in congress there. I little more detail.
eIreland people voted (the govt had a poll) to join CAU (Columbia, Argentina, and Uruguay) MUFC (CP at the time) was convinced to attack eUK because it was best for the alliance. As soon as eArgentina wiped eUK, eArgentina quit fighting there. Soon after they left CAU and joined TWO.
Yes MUCF and Congress was stupid to NE eUK and break the truce, but it was because of the CAU.
@Tim - If TWO asks you to break a truce will you?
no i wouldnt, TWO doesnt demand that countries break truces, seems the irish have no honour
doesnt matter why Ireland decided to break their truce, they did.
Does not this sound very much like what happened between Australia & Chile
yes and chile will be punished for breaking truce. just as ireland are currently
Very multi-cultural country
Well sometimes you pick the losing team. This USA were wiped not just by TWO's ability to coordinate an attack, but by COT's inability to coordinate a root in a brothel
Others say CoT coordination has been fine, but that they are merely outnumbered and thus outgunned. Who knows unless you are sitting in both HQ?
We have seen CoT's bureaucracy in action previously. How long did it take to get a verdict on the treaty breaking? I don't doubt that they were outgunned, but considering that TWO attacked on so many battlefronts at the same time, don't you think that they could have allocated their resources better to defend a few more of the regions. It's not as if they lost 1 region at a time, they were losing 3-5 at a time.
I think it's a mistake to confuse Strategic Command with the Judges. Ihear what you are saying, but total damage is the same regardless of the number of fronts. It just means TWO had a well coordinated opening move. The trick us in how long they can coordinate against a enemy that is nowiforced into more flexibility and focused strikes.
I actually think that it works to TWO's advantage more now, as you say total damage is what counts, and as future attacks will be more specific (i.e. one or two regions at a time), as TWO has greater overall damage they very well may be able to get close to completely wiping COT off the map.
When I insult CoT's ability to defend itself against the initial attack, I am not implying that it was easy for TWO, but that TWO's coordination was soo much better that CoT could very little, and what they could have done, they still didn't do.
If australia had all its regions under attack at one time, I would hope that we would be coordinated well enough to focus defending on 3-4 of the 7 regions, not trying to defend all 7 evenly. Thay way you are going to get people wasting 30mill (BH) and 150mil (CH) damage on their side on fights that don't overly matter to get BH and CH, and we can put the damage we would normally allocate to fighting these regions to defending the other 3-4 that really matter, which although we lose some regions and overall dmg, we keep potentially more regions than were attacked even though we had less overall damage done.
Thats my theory. I haven't been in a War room position before so this is just how I think things could play out if done correctly.
CoT wanted EDEN destroyed. Well,it was a brilliant move to ally whit TWO. They should expect that ex-EDEN countryes join along TWO because in CoT we had too many enemies of our friends,and now is payback time!
But the CoT says now: "Yeah,now the ex-EDEN countryes are kickin our arse and wipe us out but hey,EDEN is no more!"
Voted o/
vote sub bro
I've seen this happen before. It's really not all that new. The eUSA is always getting gang-banged like a whore that's cheaper by the half-dozen.
All this shows me is that Serbs literally took over this game, they could nott dominate in real life even with genocide. However im not suprized, the level of unemployment in Serbia and a few other CoT country's in real life pays off here.
there is only 1 war (that I know of) which Genocide allowed one side to win. WW2 USA vs Japan. I don't know why you would bring in real life war talk into a game.
he is a petty american, thats why lol
Mick there was no genocide carried out by the USA in WW2. Where did you get that from?
The 2 atomic bombs are Geonocide by it's definition. It was not a attack on military, it was an attack on civilians, it caused over 150,000 deaths. I am not pretending that there wasn't a reason for it. Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, Caste, religious, or national group". I am not saying that I disagree or agree with what was done, but it was Genocide.
[removed]
subb