eStudy about correlation between decrease of ePopulation and SLP
Clifford Burns
Deutschschweiz, 29. August 2011
The result of this study is simple: The SLP are eFags! But let us analyze why before anybody start irrational comment below
😉
The SLP are not eFags because they destroy every month again our country. They're also not eFags because they waste every month hundred of Goldz. No, they're eFags because their party contains only eGuys.
We never saw a eWomen in the SLP party, like in SNP where had many eWomens like Thalia von Sturmfels or Julia Brunner. We never saw a SLP member where communicate with eWomens, but only with eGuys. The SLP had also never a eWomen in a higher eBusiness or ePolitical position. The consequence of such destructive development is an increase of eMisogyny and decrease of our ePopulation.
I don't know what the SLP did and do in their private eRooms, but we can imagine what they practice every day or even hourly. Fact is, this supporting the decrease of our ePopulation and is destructive for the eDemography.
Instead of change somethings like initiate a eBirth program, they boycott that. The boycott is wanted because they want eImmigrate more no eWomens and increase their eFag dictatorship party of costs our ePopulation. It's sadly that members of SLP have such eMindset and terrorize the eMinorities in our eCountries just because they don't like eWomens. The eStudy shows exactly that this developing is very dangerous and self-destructive. The mass eImmigration is not a solution to eLife the eMisogyny dream.
The eMinorities in this eCountry have based on the eSwiss Constitution the same right of eLife and eGrowth. The members of SLP must respect this and stop their desperate eProgram against eWomens. Therefore I advice the eGovernment, to build a eHelp center for all the desperate souls in the SLP, treated them before the ePopulation fall of zero.
Regards
Mr. Burns
twice former President of the eSwiss Confederation
2x MoF, 2x MoE, 2x MoFA, 1x MoI, 2x PP of SNP, 2x PP of AEP, 1x Swiss Federal Judge, 2x Leader of AAD10.
P.S. So, I'm looking forward of your constructive comments
😉
Comments
You want a constructive comment? Two words:
Sally Trotter
love you cliffy
oh and another one not really constructive: der Bauernhof you filthy liar xD
Clifford,
The problem is in Baby booms and all of us know that... We cant did that because it is too hard... some of us already try that. Firstly i tried to do that on fb and i post that on some Swiss Pages. But that isnt work.
Have you any idea which will be answer on that?
And personally i think that programm against eWomens is not right, i send message to some of them, e.g. Moira Monaghan is one of them, i dont know why she dont join in anyone, i will try again.
#30
There is mo SLP. Therefore its population is zero. You are behind the times. There cannot be studies on a party that does not exist.
JNA comes back and cliffy instantly writes article.
MULTIES
[removed]
@cliffy: Thalia von Sturmfels or Julia Brunner were never SNP.
So go home!
You see? I too can write lies! And sally was with us in SLP. As soon as I'm home and not on my iphone i can prove it!
@zrtx: shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
@JNArno: Ask Arschmann, Sally was not SLP. I know you want defense yourself to be not a fag, but you will fail :>
Again... Why do you need lies?
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/why-vote-sally-trotter--1723412/1/20
I don't understand your point... There was a girl in the SLP: punkt, schluss...
You're so stupid? Or do you so stupid? Sally never worked for SLP, if you don't understand what this means, you have already answered my first question :>
"We never saw a SLP member where communicate with eWomens"
This is false anyway, who cares about who was in which party.
And you don't understand proper english...
Let me quote you: "We never saw a eWomen in the SLP party" and "We never saw a SLP member where communicate with eWomens". Are you ready to feel like a complete idiot? Let's go!
I don't talk about supposed traitor in the SLP, I don't care about that, and your article feel the same. You just say that there weren't any girl in the SLP. the article I just gave you and your last comment proves the opposite. Sally Trotter was a member of the SLP, regardless of what she did do or didn't do for/against the SLP. Adding to that that here article have a lot of comments from known SLP members, your second sentence is also a lie...
Therefore you're a) a liar b) an idiot c) unable to understand english d) writing stupid article that only you understand and e) useless to the eSwiss society
But keep coming, we all love your articles! It's always a good way to laugh!
Thank you Cliffy and don't change please!
I can't wait for your next comment who'll say I'm an idiot!
If you classify a spy inside the SLP as member of SLP, then you're really a totally idiot xD Stop write more, I fall from the chair if I read more from you. Play better with your puppets at home before we all get pulled smile muscle LOL :>
Typically SLP, argumentative weakness ends always in: a) Accusation b) Insulting c) Polemic. You're pathetic JNArno, your circus show was in the history sometimes better as today ;>
I actually feel really sorry for you right now.
I loved it xD
I spent the all evening waiting to come home to see this awesome reply 😉 so basically I started the polemic, to insult... For the accusation, i admit them... I accuse you of lying!
Last question, please dear cliffy, answer it: is it real that I never spoke to a eWoman?
i love this .D
@JNArno: Your membership in the faq party has already answered your question: It need nothing additionally comment for that :>
And if your accusation would be true, why you not open a case on the eSwiss Federal Court? I can answer this for you too, because you will fail like always, the history has proven that muahahahaha :>
i guess clifford wants to regain some of his lost power and influence.
it's kind of pathetic actually.
know this: it's never going to happen. never.
Don't cry like a baby just because I kicket you out from the government muahahahahaha xD
I can kick you everytime again with my hard foot :>