Economy: These housing numbers must be wrong.

Day 878, 20:07 Published in Canada Canada by Alias Vision
(Side note: apparently this article did not want to be published. First I lost internet connection, then my keyboard died. Either it is because it is very bad or very good... up to you loyal readers to tell me which)

Having received some very positive feedback on earnings and cost of living, I have decided to continue the economic analysis.

We already know that Canadian workers live and are paid handsomely but what about the health of the industries that employ them. The first one I decided to look at is housing.

Housing is the most labour and resource intensive industry a prospective owner can launch himself into (based on the fact that hospital and defense systems tend to be under the control of governments). The delays in producing houses increases the risks to the owners and the market can be hyper competitive due to the presence of the black market.

A note on the black market. It can't be controlled and it can't be eliminated. This is unfortunate as it tends to create a single, globe spanning, market for luxury items and high quality items. Pushed to extremes it means that any company that happens to operate in a less productive or higher production cost country will invariably fail long term. Eventually the black market swallows whatever share is available to the domestic producer.

For housing, I am assuming peak productivity of 20 workers with wellness at 90. In fact, wellness should be higher and if it is lower, then owners should spend their energies on educating their workers on how to raise and maintain their wellness.

Data sample for the morning of Day 878 of the New World.

First we must look at the wage structure of the construction companies. From $1.90 for entry level going up to $21.37 for level 7 workers. The point of the exercise is to see how much margins can be maximized and what the final cost would be if you did so. Based on this mornings salary offers, the best bang for your buck is a skill 3 worker making $4.10 a day. That represents an investment of $0.33 per productivity point generated.



So a team of twenty skill 3 workers, working at 90 wellness would produce one Q1 level house every day at a cost of 3.43 gold to the company. That is an all Canadian product, no foreign wood import. The rest of the breakdown is as follows:
Q2 would take the same workers two days and cost 5.51 gold.
Q3 would take three days and cost 7.59 gold.
Q4 would take four days and cost 9.67 gold.
Q5 would take five days and cost 11.73 gold.

Can that be right? Well based on the productivity formula it is. So why are houses so expensive? For one thing, skill 3 workers do not generally work at Q5 companies. At $4.10 a day, those workers would be hard pressed to maintain their wellness.

So let's recalculate based on skill 6 workers in Canada (slightly more productive than 7 at current wage levels). The new numbers look like this:
Q1 - 5.87 gold, one day.
Q2 - 10.4 gold, one day.
Q3 - 14.92 gold, two days.
Q4 - 19.45 gold, two days.
Q5 - 23.97 gold, two days.

Based on market prices of this morning, the lower level housing companies could not compete but already starting at Q3 the profits start showing up again.

One of the most common black market listing I have seen the past few days has houses priced as follows:
Q1 - 2.9 gold.
Q2 - 7 gold.
Q3 - 15 gold.
Q4 - 24.8 gold.
Q5 - 35.5 gold.

Even here, if a Canadian company sold to a black marketers, even allowing for the commission, a healthy profit is possible. Especially if you maximize your production.



Think my numbers are off? They might be, I will admit that I'm not an expert in higher level manufacturing and construction. However when I ran my numbers against this company, giving salaries starting at $9 for the lower skills all the way to $62 for the highest levels, and selling the house for 35.2 gold... the company still showed a profit of 3.66 gold.

There are some factors that affect the bottom line. Wellness is not guaranteed. Many times neither is the raw material costs. Finally, hiring and maintaining twenty workers is a very big challenge as anyone who tries to maintain even ten workers could attest.

Are there issues with my numbers? I'm wondering because they certainly appear rosy...