Congress Reform Brainstorm
Rob the Bruce
So the Speaker wants us to write articles or something. How does this work then Appleby?
Congress reform? Oh goody what an exciting topic for the public to read about, I'm sure their eyeballs will be glued to the screen to read articles about that old chestnut.
Well, then, here's my opinion on congress reform and stuff.
1. The speaker elections are a bloody mess
A top quality speaker
Right so what congress normally does is the last term's speaker asks some PPs for people to stick up for election, some may ask to run but normally it's just who the PPs have thrown into the mix. What this can lead to is people being unaware that they're in the election and then "oh god I'm speaker now wat". What happened this time around was hollenboer nominated Dapper, who didn't know about it and then proceeded to wreck the election "in protest", the first of two daft protests so far this term. So in the end we had to do a second one, and people stepped up themselves and disregarded PPs, and it went quite smoothly and SHA came out the winner.
See now the second election was jolly good, so why not be logical:
CUT OUT THE PPs
This prevents uncooperative arsewarts like hollenboer annoying their congressmen and nominating an unaware candidate, and also it may end up with us getting more options during the election if a bunch of people want the job. Should just take a fairly simple tweak of the speaker act and we're done with bollocks forever.
Should nobody come forward, I'd suggest then maybe contact PPs. But even then their may be other options, hell, the CP could step in and open the darned PMs maybe. That's not too strenuous, is it?
2. Speakers should write more articles and stuff
We can't make some stupid legislation about this one, but for people to actually want the speaker job so point one can work the speakers could at least look as though they're powerful. Writing waffle seems to make you look like a proper powerful, knowledgeable man, at least that's how TUP CP candidates tend to do things. And they win an awful lot.
Also, by writing articles now and then, just an odd report about what congress is doing, the public is reassured that congress is actually doing something (even when we're not). Speakers should usually do a bit more than open some PMs.
3. How we should communicate
It's the big one.
A different Big One in Blackpool
Every term congress starts their unproductive bawfest by arguing about which method of communication is better. A few people say the forum is better, but in the end it's always the PM that gets used the most. Fact.
See now, why not promote the use of ALL THE COMMS.
"But that would be chaos you crazy fool!" says you. (just pretend, mkay?) Well, what I envisage in my head is this system working quite well, if one uses the following system:
1. Speaker opens PMs
2. Main bulk of congress bickers in the PM
3. Small groups use their favoured communication method to communicate with each other
4. Small group comes up with a good idea
5. Said Small group takes the idea to the main PM
6. Boring congressmen shoot the idea down and let it crash and burn/congress says ok but nothing's ever done about
7. Speaker tells the other PM group about said idea (if it only ended up in one)
8. Other PM group does step 6
Rinse and repeat
See now this might not work as well as I hope, but it allows smaller groups to discuss some ideas and stuff and not just have people in congress going "HURR DURR FORUM > EVERYTHING FORUM WILL FIX EVERYTHING FORUM WILL SOLVE WORLD HUNGER AND BRING UNITY TO SKYRIM FORUM FORUM FORUM" and then getting annoyed when somebody goes "I'd rather we'd IRC tho, I like that fast conversation shizznit" It would also let some people within said smaller groups bond and stuff, allowing people to actually make some friends within the group, and then you never know, we might get congressmen arranging romantic dinners or something.
It's an idea anyway, if we had a bunch of good congressmen this proposed system would work well. Of course, though, every congress has a bunch of complete arsebags so that may not work at all.
That's all the reform rubbish I can rustle up right now, see you next time eUK.
-Rob the Bruce
Comments
Congress reform? Well this sounds familiar.
I do agree with pretty much everything you say Rob. PMs do seem to end up the most used thing; and I think we should adapt to the fact that people just don't really want to use the forums all that much. Small, dedicated PM groups to discuss on specific issues (a committee), as well as a full congress PM and IRC meetings. If people want to start forum threads they can, but they shouldn't expect everyone to pander to their preferred system.
My brain works better doing stuff in this game than it ever has at school.
Maybe it's the Speaker and the people that insist on one that are in the wrong, not congress
That isn't a proposed system, that is how congress should be, except number 2, you can get rid of number 2 altogether. Or instead of giving it a semi-important sounding name, start referring to it by it's correct name. Secretary. See how many of these title whores want the job then.
Eh point 2 was an idea that was a bit iffy in my head after I read it back.
all of congress should be writing more articles and informing their voting public on what is happening in congressland.
Appleby should do a great job following up the improvements made in Adrastros' term.
Hahahahaha
I remember when we drew it up, we included the PP's so that no individual party could claim they weren't involved, which was a leading concern of particular parties at the time
Well now it seems to cause more problems than solutions.
Voted - and to cut a long story short - I agree with Adrastos' second comment.