CJCS: Rebellion and theft?

Day 1,232, 06:33 Published in USA USA by Avruch


Today the chief general of the eUnited States Military decided that the limited oversight of Congress and the constitutional authority of the President was too much for him to accept. Along with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he declared the military independent of the the elected government of the eUS. (Read more about this here.) This was, according to members of the military, a response to attempts by Congress to enforce the constitutional amendment recently passed. (See here for discussion on this amendment, its initial versions and final text.) I don't have Congress access, so I can't see exactly what was said between Congress and military leadership, but nothing justifies the military abandoning the leadership structure of the eUnited States.

What does this mean? First, it means that the senior military leadership has misappropriated assets that are the property of the people of the eUnited States. Thousands of gold worth of companies, orgs, raw materials and finished products that belong to you have been adversely possessed by the military. Hundreds or even thousands of golds, tens of thousands of USD, all now controlled by a military structure that has declared itself independent of the people of the eUSA. I support the military, think well of the members of the JCS that I know personally, and would like to see the structure and organization of the military remain the same however this works out. I hope this gets resolved with a minimum of disruption for all affected.

Are all members of the military equally responsible? Absolutely not. I spent more than a year in the military, rising to the rank of lieutenant general, and I have enormous respect for most members of the military and many friends among them. Bradley Reala, and other members of the Joint Chiefs, are solely responsible for this decision. Some members of the military rank and file or officer corps will support their leadership in this decision, but I don't blame them for that.

What do we do now? Things are still working themselves out. We haven't heard directly from all the members of the Joint Chiefs, only from Brad. It's possible they haven't all signed on; perhaps they intend to continue to respect the authority of the president and Congress. In any case, the president and his team have plans to deal with various contingencies to protect the integrity of the eUnited States and to continue to fulfill our obligations to our allies. The president retains national command authority. In the mean time, members of the military are urged to register on eusaforums.com to keep track of events and to get a full understanding of what is going on and why. While I expect the military itself will not be receiving funding in the immediate future, we will make arrangements to ensure that soldiers loyal to the eUnited States are fully supplied to fight on our behalf.

I want to reinforce this: while Congress may not permit the military itself to receive funding, we (speaking as the current National Security Advisor, and the next Secretary of Defense if Emerick wins tonight) will find a way to make sure the people in the military can continue to fight.

Finally, if you wish to join an alternate military group, consider the militias: Join the Ultramarines, join Seal Team 6, join EZ Company.


Handy tools: www.erepublik-market.com