Cand eD-zeu citeste articolele

Day 539, 05:07 Published in Romania Republic of Moldova by Adrian Culicencu

eD-zeu este baiat de treaba. S-a gandit sa fie o forma upgradata, tunata, a Celui spiritual.
Daca D-zeu a creat rugaciunea ca forma de comunicare intre muritorii si Creator, eD-zeu a creat eZiarele ca mijloc de expunere a rugilor si de transcriere a gandurilor/sperantelor/frustrarilor/defi cientelor.

Shmeker eD-zeu asta.... a lasat o vreme impresia ca ar fi la fel ca D-zeu, adica nu raspunde direct la rugi ci printr-o serie de evenimente/semne ce pot fi cu usurinta tratate ca si coincidente.
Insa eD-zeu citeste articolele... si zilele acestea reactioneaza... direct... prin raspunsuri de genul "too funy" sau prin actiuni de tipul "Temporarily banned".
Este un lucru bun.. asadar articolele ajung nu numai la emuritori ci si le eD-zeu si subalternii sai: Sf. ePetre, Sf. eIon etc. (exista si o eMaria???).
In concluzie... in afara de petitie mai exista o metoda de comunicare cu eD-zeu: articolele.

Astept de la voi sa-mi trimiteti o lista de reactii ale emanatiilor lui eD-zeu in articolele voastre.

Imi permit sa incep lista cu un exemplu (scuze smif ca nu ti-am cerut acordul):
1. http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/erepublik-still-beta-798330/1/all

Mana eCreatorul a scris : 🙂 This article is way too funny to be deleted (thanks xcite)

si

@Hamycta: Bugs and exploits are not the subject of discussion in this topic. We can discuss about this in the open letters topic on the forum. As for the statements like how lousy the admins are because they put a Beta logo on that site and the fact that they realized they made a mistake and then solved the problem fast it is indeed a chain of events that can be easily seen just the way it was mentioned in this article: "they don't have the desire to answer to the community, they delete articles and do nothing"

@smif: Your article was ironical towards us and our huge mistake of placing a Beta logo there was interpreted in a funny way by you in the article that we are still in Beta. I admire your sense of humor here. Seriously.

si

@xcite: Sorry about this. My bad, will edit in a second

si

@GabrielP: It's extremely funny how some users who even met us in real life and talked about the development of eRepublik and realized how much work is involved in a start-up and especially in a product such as eRepublik, consider that we only focus and have a great response time when we screwed up things and upload a different logo. There is no mention at all about bugs, exploits or other issues that appeared in eRepublik and for these we are indeed truly to be blamed. We assigned many resources in fixing these issues and we will do that in the future. Everybody should realize that our goal is to provide a perfect product and we work at plenty of tasks daily in order to achieve this. But from those issues, to having members in the community that write articles and mock us for the mistake of a team member who posted a Beta logo there, is a long journey that goes beyond my imagination. Let's talk about solutions, let's find solutions but don't hunt each minor detail and mistake of our team. Smif, we would have appreciated a lot if you could recommend somebody for this position rather than spending 30 minutes writing articles about how dumb the admins for uploading an old logo. We've met in real life and I know you are very smart (the ironical message in the article proves this again) but let's focus on solutions rather than pointing fingers to the team.


SMIF, sper ca implicarea lui eD-zeu in articolul tau sa nu fie unica implicare in presa, pentru ca atunci voi crede ca esti pe cale sa devi eSfant sau esti si tu o emanatie a Sa.