Bristol

Day 181, 08:55 Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom by KIA Sneak

The Bristol local elections will be of interest to many people and This is due to the rather heated discussions between two of its main candidates (Twat-ers and Chrisclamp).

With more articles about Bristol then any other region we have to ask ourselves what has warranted such uproar. The honest answer is both of the candidates in question have a following that is unwilling to back down.

With personal attacks on an rise and Spam levels increasing I ask you what the facts are in this battle of the titans.

I am of course bias in this election but I would like to try to set the record straight. Twat-ers is the current mayor of Bristol and imo has done nothing wrong as mayor. He has proposed several schemes to improve Bristol as a whole but the problems arise because Twat-ers himself is very unpublicised. His polices can be misinterpreted and this has given him a bad image to the few that have not heard the true story.

Chrisclamp however is the complete opposite. As the Mayor of Bristol before Twat-ers his campaign was littered with articles showing what he was doing (whether it be good or bad) And this plus his devout followers have given him mixed reviews with the people of Bristol and again it is usually those who do not hear the true story who are quick to judge.

And this is where the article becomes propaganda. Both candidates have had experience in running Bristol but I would like to challenge both sides to come up with one reason why the other should not be the mayor.

I ask that they state the negative as both sides are friends with there candidate and so asking for a positive reason for the candidate would be the obvious “because I know him and he rules”.




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EEQ2H5b3lg&eurl=http://www.erepublik.com/article-276412.html&my=1[/youtube]