AW Temp Ban : The Actual Facts - Part 1
Australian Warlord
Before we get into the real juicy parts, We'll talk about the actual facts. The claim that I received a 3 day ban for multi accounts is a 100% lie. The claim that I recieved a 3 day ban for any racial issues is a 100% lie. The claim that these come from official admin sources is a 100% lie.
Everybody should read the claims & ask serious questions about the integrity for those who've made the claims against me. But I'll leave the juicy material for part 2. But I'll just say this for now. I've dug up some very juicy material & I'm sure that the admins will be very interested in it.
Ok the facts.
As you know, I am engaged in military activities against the eIndonesian government. Via my org, I wrote articles encouraging Australians in eIndonesia to fight against them. In it I gave people the opportunity to fight against eIndonesia & provided the link to do so. The admins ruled that this was denying the opportunity of people to choose whether to fight or not. On the surface this seems illogical however in a way I do understand the admins thinking on this (afterall people do click without thinking). I accept the admins thinking on this & the punishment they dished out.
- - -
Quote Admins : "1.2 Every citizen has the right to choose if he/she will participate in a fight or not.
The above decision has been taken as a result of your following action:
Posting links that automatically lead citizens into a fight. Such links were posted by an organization created by you."
The material (edited) that resulted in the ban.
A King who's soul & spirit is controlled by someone else is more imprisoned than the man locked up in the tower.
To all Australians (& others) in occupied territories : Today you have the opportunity to fight against the eIndonsians. You can tell them that we can be friends if they hand back all of our territories or we can assist the enemy if eIndonesia continues treating us like dogs.
Today you can make a difference & inform eIndonesia that the full political & territorial independence of eAustralia might be the most benificial avenue for eIndonesia.
Anyway if you wish to fight against eIndonesia to send eIndonesia a direct message then click on this direct battle link.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/battles/*cut*
This link are for those who support eIndonesian imperialism against us.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/wars/*cut*
To repeat, if you wish to fight against eIndonesian imperialism against us then this is the direct battle link.
http://www.erepublik.com/ en/battles/*cut*
When your soul is under the control of another power, nothing owned under your name is actually yours.
That's the facts. The claim that I received a 3 day ban for multi accounts is a 100% lie. The claim that I recieved a 3 day ban for any racial issues is a 100% lie. The claim that the multi account or racial ban claims came from official admin sources is a 100% lie.
Comments
It's good to see your trying to clear your name.
good 2 see u wrote a reply to the stuff, however I was expecting more, something worthwhile 😛 guess we can move on now 😃
bad excuse if ya ask me 😛
Wel scoty, I'm sure that people will love the juicy truthful material that I've dug up on you. I'll leave you with that thought for a while.
Im finding it hard to believe too.
Especially considering we already have been shown the Reasons.
Voted. Good to see you back. And well done taking the admin's decision maturely.
Apparently, wars have been lost when links have created that resulted in large numbers of people fighting on the opposite side: I assume that this is why the admins are determined to strike at anything similar.
Doesn't seem like an unrealistic claim.
I'm trying to believe you, Mr. Warlord. But I'm finding it hard when everyone here seems to be under the same impression, that you were banned. How can so many people have thought the same thing without some essence of truth? But if you say so, I will be glad to change my article based on your account.
I belive in admin, they always to thier best 😉
btw, fight mybrute:
http://gudrun-schyman.mybrute.com
/me thinks.....hmmm nope no idea Aw, please explain?
I wrote up a nice summary of the past three days events should anyone be interested...
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-australian-warlord-controversy--775274/1/20
Score half dozen points for plausible excuse, subtract several hundred for threats of blackmail.
trine ...or trite
Erm... that doesn't sound like the truth. Did the admins contact you?
It's believable and I agree that's probably what he got banned for - here's why:
If he was found guilty of racism it would be a lot more than a 3 day ban.
If he was found guilty of multi accounting it would be a perma ban.
So this makes sense and the punishment matches the crime, I imagine if he hadn't have put up the indo link or explained before then the punishment would have been worse but the admins have actually done something right 😮
I tell you what. All those who claim that I'm lying make a deal. A formal agreement that which party is lying about the reasons for the temp ban will agree to quit the game forever. We'll then get the admins to publically release this.
great article, nice to read your side of the story.
Juicy material? Forcing people to quit the game forever?
Yeah, I'm sorry but blackmail, threats and aggression aren't going to win me over I'm afraid.
I'm just going to return the favor B.Seaborne.
@AW: Be careful what you say.
Let me direct your attention to two ER rules:
"2.2 - No insult, public accusation without proof, or indirect attack on a citizen are allowed."
"3.2 - Quotation of private discussion without the consent of those parties involved is prohibited. If a citizen reports a quotation of a private discussion, it goes without saying that the action has not been approved by the reporting citizen."
1. I don't beleive AW multies
2. He could possibly be banned for some comments (but he's remarkably smart about what he says)
3. I beleive this story
lol, looking at another 3 day ban alrdy m8 😛
What favor? I'm sorry, Mr. Warlord, but I don't understand your meaning. Could you elaborate?
Bad wording of that comment on my part. I'm not returning it on you B.Seaborne.
That's okay, I understand 😃
The allegations against me are 100% lies. Why don't those making the allegations that I was banned for the reasons that they claim actually present some evidence. They can't, not even after they changed their own story. They go around changing their story yet don't provide any information to back up the allegations.
Surely some of you would actually get your minds into gear about this & actually question this. They lied when they claimed the admins provided them with info saying that I'd been banned for multiaccounts and they lied when they changed their story & they claimed the admins provided them with info saying I'd been banned for racial issues.
They lie, change their story & lie again. They don't present any evidence to support their claims. Think about it & ask yourselves how trustworthy are they.
- - - -
How about Rule 2.2 then Derek. Why don't you question your buddies.
oh, that article
well, it won't work in Indonesia anyway
and there's no dog treatment also
Nice to hear the true story.
@AW: Just looking at your stats, that is some nice exp. you have xD
Return the favour?
Retaliation, very mature AW, very mature.
If you're actually trying to convince the public to even seriously consider your side of things, I strongly suggest you think carefully about what information you're going to release in the second part of this article.
@Leonard : Everything that I will release I have actual evidence of.
Ok AW, any updates on when we'll see the "juicy" second part?
Yeah I've got my popcorn ready 😛
@Lyman : Well one of the things in the second part has just been reveiled, that Scoty is a actual convicted multiaccounter.