ADP: No Spies in the House!
JackTrout
G’day peoples!
Well, it has been an interesting week for the ADP. Not everyone has been informed of all that’s been going on, so I’m going to remedy that here and now.
Just over a week ago, I noticed an unfamiliar name- Imran Khan 2- running for congress via the ADP. So I looked at his profile, and found some interesting information. You can look for yourself here:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/8655134
First, the guy was e-born on 21st February 2015. His strength: 27. No medals of any kind. His only damage shown was 33k for Germany.
When I first checked his profile, he had only 2 friends. One was Legend Nospan, and the other was Imran Khan 1, who shared not just Imran Khan 2’s name, but his e-birthday:
This raised some questions for me, so I sent a PM to ask them- maybe there were perfectly acceptable reasons for these things:
When 2 days passed with no answers forthcoming, I ticketed admins. The ticket and their reply:
I mentioned those actions in the congress thread, and notified the ADP. I requested more ADP candidates for congress:
ADP members alerted me to the fact that there was at least one additional Imran Khan in the e-world. You saw ^ the admins' response to my ticket.
At that point, I notified all top 5 eAustralian political party presidents about the situation, and requested they put up as many congressional candidates as possible. Also, I requested that they each send a candidate to the ADP if possible, to ensure we could avoid having an obvious multi representing us in congress.
A game rule was mentioned, that only 20 candidates could be included from any one party. At that time, the ADP had 20 candidates up, including the apparent multi.
LanyisLost graciously offered to shift parties and provide the 21st candidate, an offer that I consider the height of e-patriotism and selflessness.
As it happens, that rule had been changed some time ago.
As it happens- and I still don’t know what convinced them- admins reversed their decision, and Imran Khan 2 is now permanently banned.
This threat to eAustralian security no longer exists. This has proven to be a great display of solidarity in both my party and my e-country, and I am proud of both!
I thank all the members of the ADP, including Lany (at least for the moment
🙂) who came together to take action on this issue. Many thanks also to the top 5 party presidents and officers who offered their ideas and assistance.
I hope this clears up any lingering confusion. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to PM me.
My congratulations to all eAussies elected to the new congress term. Serve well, friends.
Cheers,
JackTrout
Comments
Whew, thank god we are still a Democratic party
ADP FTW \o/
Bugga.. i was planning on entertaining Lany for a night with some South Australian red wine, a delicious home cooked meal and a soothing conversation full of intrigue and mystery as a means of thanking her.. i guess she will return to her own party now and i will have to go back to staring at stolen polaroids of a naked Gaugature posing on the beach in a mankini whilst i sit and polish my golf clubs.. ah such is life, so harsh and cruel sometimes 🙁
oh.. and nice work JT - ADP FTW
That's ok, if you look directly behind me in that photo Lany is there giving me a back-rub 😉
lol you bastard!
shucks im jealous.... i want a dinner and a nite out like that.. 😛
YAYYY!1
Maybe he made more multies while the admins were monitoring him. ADP FTW
OK, let me get this right. A multi was spotted (regardless of what admin had to say at the time). Some steps are in order.
There are 40 seats up for election. It would be hubris of the highest order to expect 20 seats going to any one party. On recent elections I'd say more than 10 seats to any one party is unlikely, although the ADP has a bigger membership lead than they have recently had.
It would be reasonable to conclude that anyone at 15 or below on the senate list is not going to be elected. That's 37.5% of the vote - not gonna happen unless you know something I don't know.
So, explain to me the drive to get 21 people on the ticket, to force this multi off the list? There's a logical inconsistency.
And, failing all of that and in the face of a concerted effort by a zombie army, there is absolutely no reason why this one multi would have to be added to any sort of government discussion.
Right, as a Democratic party would it be right for us to leave a congressmen off the government discussion if they accepted the friend request and said they want in?
Dammed if you do and dammed if you don't. I gave figures that it would be highly unlikely that we would get sufficient seats even at 20 people but I still advised JT to block till it was entirely safe.
I like the fact that Lany was the only person to stand up and answer the call it just shows what type of community we have currently when most choose to just pick out anything small that will get themselves the attention
I never even heard there was a call for warm bodies with a weak pulse. FFS, I'd have been happy to sit at #19 on the ADP list and resign if somehow I ended up elected. It's not an indictment on the community at all, just lines of communication.
As a democratic party it's not right for you to stack a list to exclude a willing candidate. What's the difference to deliberately excluding them? The end result is the same, only the means differ.
Of course you would be happy to sit at #19, you don't want anything to do with congress currently. ADP also has plenty of blockers that were willing to sit at the lower end to block and not make congress.
Deliberately excluding a multi account is part of the blocking used in the election process, Plato does not always ban multi accounts hence the blocking which you have been around long enough Ilene to know that it has been used in the past quite effectively.
Part of the game mechanics allows a PP to "stack" the candidates to suit the party requirements, it has nothing to do with being a Democratic party or not.
Lines of communication where there as the top 5 parties were informed. I am sure you got that far into the article before you decided to go off on a wild tangent
Believe it or not I read it twice before commenting. And then had a glass of wine. Rarely do I shoot my mouth off without thinking. Thanks for the ad hominem attack though. Can't argue the point, attack the messenger.
Game mechanics certainly allow a PP to block a suspected multi, or exclude people they don't like. I argue that exclusion by PP decree is less democratic than the new senate voting to exclude a clear multi account.
There is no tangent, other than both our last replies. I am trying to make the point that the response was out of all proportion to the issue. With 20 candidates, at least 5 were never going to make it. So why ask for more bodies?
Let me respond to your comment "Believe it or not I read it twice before commenting. "
With are you sure?
http://imgur.com/2UQbmu5
Safe is the operative word here
In the real world there are no guarantees.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is probably too tough a standard for a game.
A risk as low as reasonably practical, with a list of 15, is good enough given a fail safe fallback of deliberate exclusion.
So it is settled then, let's all sit on our hands and do f%$k all about anything
Ilene your party president would of been informed, hence her leaving the party only a short term into her mandate to save Australiain the JT/Guag army from a lone multi account rather then send some of her political party members to the ADP.
And as a reward gets pole position in the ADP congress list because apparently no one in the ADP is good enough to head up their ballot
Hence why you were down the list Rusty. I think ahead
I am not too fussed where I am on the list Guagature, being in congress is not a big deal to me. Might as well leave room for inactive players or sideline coaches who comment but don't do anything
So it's agreed you should have a spot
Very rich coming from you Guagature
Congrats to a great party! great job for all those that step forward to help. and especially a big thanks for Lany jumping partys. Takes a big person to do so.
ADP FTW!
Lmao the admins always pull that bullshit line 😛
There are still spy's in the house, still wolf's in sheeps clothing. But they are just playing a better game at it and not using multi accounts.
There are leaks and people know about it, but hey you managed to get one multi banned whoopie hoot hoot. Now maybe you can get some people to stop leaking government information rather than making ADPers miss out on congress seats by putting other party ring ins in
Thanks for trying to clear things up Jack. Some people just won't accept good intentions with no malice aforethought.
You come out smelling of roses Lany. 🙂
Though I heard a phrase this morning that makes me chuckle. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
You did well JK 🙂