[Zyl] This is for the three headed dragon. =P
•
by Zyleris
three headed dragon
i personally favor another legendary creature, Cerberus
but either way is fine.
Noveras, Nicholas, and Straatman the three headed dragon,
i wish that you all should have just stop bashing each other.
As for facts, when a person (in this cases, more accurately players) dont like another person, they will find thousands of reason of dislike/hate or to argue with that person. Everything you do will become foe's point of attack. In short, the fighting will not end, forever, if none of you came into understanding.
However, if there is a person that you like, everything he/she does will become logical, and understandable.
So, i wish all of you will stop fighting with each other. Because, three headed dragon / cerberus, will die together if either of each head fail to cooperate.
Your truly,
Zyleris
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
First voted!!
I'll. Vote later internet problem -.-
voted
and I am agree with Zyleris
voted!
Who will enjoy the most of watching a Cerberus's head fighting with each other, if not our enemies (excluding Amli and Buntak)
Supported!
i'd say, more to sibling rivalry to get people's attentions...
why ???? let's enjoy it while we have nothing to do here, at least we are busy in this xP
I've made my stand on this issues and I just want them to stop disturbing me and as long as they do that than there will be no problem
v
Amer59, if this keeps going on, it's going to make us look weaker to the rest of the world. We need to present a strong front to other countries or they won't respect us.
agreed with amer, at least our media seams active, all thanks to this
Myntax, we are weak enough and no one interested in this nation, they even don't attack us for their fun .... xD
"However, if there is a person that you like, everything he/she does will become logical, and understandable."
Not true, I disagree with a lot of things people I like do, but I continue to like them because they don't personally attack me when I talk to them about it. Granted there is still bias, my bias is not that severe. Is the loss of gold not important anymore? If I noticed nicholas doing the same I would have called him out on it. I didn't actually accuse Noveras of stealing the gold, I asked what his side of the story was, granted I asked in a poorly worded way.
He has yet to provide physical proof(I know it may take awhile to do so) but until he does, I will not forget this incident. I did not wish to attack him, call him names or anything of that sort. It's why I edited out the vast part of my article before I published it. When he responded with personal attacks, I followed suit.
Noveras, I'm glad you are ready to forget the past, but I do not. I may let the past go, but I always keep it fresh in my mind. It's because of this I know you are doing the same thing you have always done. When someone calls you out on something, you fight back to a certain point and then talk about just forgetting it all. Every time you do it, you leave the argument with the opposing side winning. It appears to me, you are trying to save face because you have nothing left to say.
If you are truly ready to let the past go, then I am ready to let it die again. But I will not forget this or any other incident, because there has never been closure for them. You never finish a debate/argument and you will never win like that. This looks exactly like a smaller version of the "Mr. S" scandal. There is a suspect that cannot be proven guilty, but also refuses to prove himself innocent because he "shouldn't have to" That's the shittiest excuse I've ever heard and I don't accept that as closure.
Mr. S?
voted
@Buntak: You don't remember when there was a bunch of money stolen from the Central Bank?