[東方之珠] 中國外交政策應注重的地方 What China’s Foreign Policy Should Focus Now
Jameson L. Tai
It is no secret that China is a developing country in the eWorld. It is also no secret that just like in real life, China’s history has been filled with foreign powers taking over sections of our country. At the time of writing, China has a total of six regions in foreign control:
Hungary: Heilongjiang
Iran: Liaoning, Jilin
Indonesia: Guangdong, Fujian, Xinjiang
China’s foreign policy has always been, and until announced otherwise, neutral in international affairs. The reason is simple, every time there’s a world conflict, somehow eChina always gets sucked in to the conflict and then when there is resolution, eChina is left in pieces while the superpowers of the world ignore the reconstruction the warfare left behind.
eChina has been getting progress in having eIndonesia returning certain sections to us as shown by recent resistance wars. However, three regions remain in their control that are strategically advantageous for them to retain control. Guangdong and Fujian are Indonesia’s thoroughfare to the northern areas of China such as Korea and Japan, which opens up access to Russia and the United States. Xinjiang is Indonesia’s ticket to Europe. Indonesia does not deny this fact and has repeatedly made statements to Chinese officials that they are working on getting us our regions back and that they are our friends.
Just like Iran’s previous MPP requests, China has been extremely uncomfortable with faking to be friends with people who steal sections of our land. It’s like having a guy come behind you and put you in the death grip while asking if he could hang out with you and be friends.
PEACE GC is no more – the remaining four countries which several have since nicknamed HIRI (Hungary Indonesia Russia and Iran) have made no statements as to what their plans are in terms of returning Chinese regions, they have made no attempts at asking our officials whether we want our lands returned even though our top officials repeatedly request that HIRI does so.
Before more countries in Sol gets sucked into Indonesia’s threats, China needs to know exactly what HIRI’s plans are for the Far East. The same goes for all other alliance leaders and world powers as well. We will not participate and suckered into joining your cause only to get the short end of the stick yet again.
China needs to focus on the return of our lands and the strengthening of our people – we need to partner with those of us who will help us reach our goals.
If elected, I will make sure that retrieving our lost regions and improving the quality of life of our citizens will be a priority. Please vote for me as congressman of Shaanxi, China on November 25th!
Jameson L. Tai
繁體中文
中國外交政策應注重的地方
在eRepublik世界裡,中國是一個開發中的國家,這不是什麼秘密。而正如現實世 界一樣,中國的 史書上也滿是被外國勢力竊取和分割的篇章,這也不是什麼秘密。在寫下本文之時,中國仍 有六個區域在外國控制之下:
被匈牙利控制的國土:黑龍江
被伊朗控制的國土:遼寧,吉林
被印尼控制的國土:廣東,福建,新疆
中國的外交政策對於國際政治事務歷來是保持中立,原因簡單,因為每次發生國際事件,盟 國都會讓中國陷入麻煩之中。事件了結後,國土會被某一方佔領,而世界大國們事後則佔據 了我們的國土。
首頁中國一直努力在繼續令印度尼亞西歸還這些地區的進程上並在最近一系列的抵抗運動中 有所體現。然而,三個有戰略意義的地區仍然被保留以有助於他們繼續保持對該地域的控制 。廣東和福建是印度尼亞西通往中國北方通往俄羅俄和美國的門戶 - 韓國和日本等地的大道。新疆則是通往歐洲的直航班。印度尼西亞不否認這一事實,並一再 向中國政府重申他們將歸還我們的省份,他們是我們的朋友。
正如之前伊朗向我國提出的MPP的合約要求一樣,中國對要假扮成竊取了我國領土的人的 朋友一事極其不快。就像一個人來到你身後,把你抓住要脅點你的死穴,而問他是否能與您 成為朋友。
和平全球社會現已解散,餘下的四大國又名HIRI(匈牙利,印尼,蘇聯,伊朗)還沒有 作出任何對於還回我土的聲明,而且中方多次嘗試接觸,但他們沒有回應。
在更多的Sol成員國被捲入印尼的威脅之前,中國需要了解HIRI在遠東究竟有什麼樣 的計劃。這一點同樣也同樣適用於其他所有的聯盟領袖和世界強權。我們將不會盲目地加入 任何一方,再一次成為你們的踏腳石。
中國要把注意力集中在歸還我國的土地和富國強民上 - 並且我們需要的是肯真心幫助我們的夥伴。
如果我當選,我會確保我們拿回國土和改善國民生活的提案會得到優先權。
請在十一月二十五號到陝西投Jameson L. Tai一票!
简体中文
中国外交政策应注重的地方
在eRepubilk世界里,e中国是一个开发中的国家,这不是什么秘密。而正如现实 世界一样,e中 国的史书上也满是被外国势力窃取和分割的篇章,这也不是什么秘密。在写下本文之时,中 国仍有六个区域在外国控制之下:
被匈牙利控制的国土: 黑龙江
被伊朗控制的国土: 辽宁, 吉林
被印尼控制的国土: 广东, 福建, 新疆
中国的外交政策对于国际政治事务历来是保持中立,原因简单,因为每次发生国际事件,盟 国都会让中国陷入麻烦之中。事件了结后,国土会被某一方占领,而世界大国们事后则占据 了我们的国土。
e中国一直努力在继续令印度尼亚西归还这些地区的进程上并在最近一系列的抵抗运动中有 所体现。然而,三个有战略意义的地区仍然被保留以有助于他们继续保持对该地域的控制。 广东和福建是印度尼亚西通往中国北方通往俄罗俄和美国的门户- 韩国和日本等地的大道。新疆则是通往欧洲的直航班。印度尼西亚不否认这一事实,并一再 向中国政府重申他们将归还我们的省份,他们是我们的朋友。
正如之前伊朗向我国提出的MPP合约要求一样,中国对要假扮成窃取了我国领土的人的朋 友一事极其不快。就像一个人来到你身后,把你抓住要胁点你的死穴,而问他是否能与您成 为朋友。
PEACE 全球社会现已解散,余下的四大国又名HIRI(匈牙利,印尼,苏联,伊朗)还没有作出 任何对于还回我土的声明,而且中方多次尝试接触,但他们没有回应。
在更多的Sol成员国被卷入印尼的威胁之前,中国需要了解HIRI在远东究竟有什么样 的计划。这一点同样也同样适用于其他所有的联盟领袖和世界强权。我们将不会盲目地加入 任何一方,再一次成为你们的踏脚石。
中国要把注意力集中在归还我国的土地和富国强民上- 并且我们需要的是肯真心帮助我们的伙伴。
如果我当选, 我会确保我们拿回国土和改善国民生活的提案会得到优先权。
请在十一月二十五号到陕西投Jameson L. Tai一票!
http://somokon.com/erep/hitcounter.png">
Comments
GO JLT
this article voted, and I'll travel on election day to vote for you.
...
这篇文章投票,我会在选举日前往投你一票。
...
這篇文章投票,我會在選舉日的旅行,以投你一票。
voted
voted
I like your bi-lingual posts. 🙂 But i think you need to shed your eUSA allegiance, and start thinking like and for eChina. Making such claims will only suck eChina to either side of the divide and losing its neutrality. At it is, eChina has insufficient citizens/strength to command all is territories with succumb to, say eUSA, or eRUssia 's protection.
Please verify what you're accusing me of before making such claims. I am only stating that we need to hear from those who control the lands that they took from China... and we want them back.
Slapping a random comment saying I'm forcing China to side with the US/Brolliance/EDEN is not only irresponsible, but outright wrong. I suggest you reread what I wrote and rethink of what you commented.
Dear friend,
I've got three letters for your article, just three letters...
WOW!
This is good, China have been under someones foot too long.
谁能告诉我为啥钛童鞋的文章总是这么受欢迎捏。。。
回楼上的超级超级英雄,因为有一群弟兄们帮他默默地投票
我看过他的告别文,貌似他在美帝人缘不错
我也看过他的告别文。。。嘿嘿。。。
那你还问……
Although we want those regions back, it is of NO use to tell HIRI again and again. We understand their stand and they understand our stand. No need to speak it aloud.
voted and subscribed
@mariohexu: Actually this is the first time I've spoken about HIRI, and since this is simply part of my foreign policy stance as part of my campaign, I'm not sure what the big deal is. 🙂
I personally think that this is an excellent campaign. Good luck in your congress run.
good luck JLT
@Jameson L. Tai
To be honest, I do not quite understand your opinion. Everybody want those region back. The question is, how to get them back.
You propose that our official should ask HIRI contraries for their statement. Is it correct?
China still has one region not under its control
Taiwan: Admin
😛
你应该告诉我们, 为什么你收到 美国团体的补给品
Furthermore, your English version says "northern areas of China such as Korea and Japan". As much as I love China, I don't consider my country to be a 'northern area' of her.
Reiji: I assume this is where you blame google translator.
@Reiji
Jameson L. Tai was an eUSAer a few days ago.
Clearly, China does not include Korea or Japan.
He was an American a few days ago and now he is running for congress?
Don't you think there is something wrong with this situation?
@Reiji: Asian Smurf Holdings is my personal organization that I bought with my own gold, the gifts were to offset a Q5 job I took the first two days of being in China and I had some USD left in my org accounts to spare. For proof, simply look at the org's avatar... that's my face on the smurf's head.
@Reiji: Please read every word I post, not just take words out of context. "Thoroughfare" means passage way, as in a passage way to Korea and Japan via the northern areas of China. If you do not understand the English words in my articles, perhaps you should use a dictionary.
@Reiji again (sorry to triple post, but I'm responding to the posts one by one): I am running for congress because I am now a citizen of eChina. There is nowhere in eRepublik bylaws that says citizens must hold a certain amount of days as a regular citizen before he or she may run for congress.
I am running for congress in China as a concerned citizen who have seen a very different system of operations economically, militarily, and politically differ from those in China. So far in my previous article I have been greeted by fellow citizens of China and it is you alone who is asking all of these questions.
Although I do appreciate doing background checks on people running for congress in your country, I would much rather you ask me and let me explain this to you in an eRep chatroom, IRC, QQ, or country forums. I may also respond in future articles. However, this nonconstructive mudslinging from the sidelines without proper basis does make me question your true intentions.
@mariohexu: Before the leaders of China shall consider in terms of setting their official foreign policy, it is standard policy in general politics to request comment or an official statement from other countries as much as possible to guarantee a certain level of transparency. Before I can side with anybody, I must consider the facts.
Fact: We have 6 Chinese regions no longer in Chinese control
Fact: We have asked HIRI to begin negotiations and request comment/statements and have not been returned
Fact: It is in the interest of a number of party's constituents who wish to have these overtaken Chinese regions returned into Chinese control
Therefore, it is in my interest and the interests of my constituents of whom I would be representing if I were to be elected to understand what our situation is on this topic and respond accordingly - as well as keeping my constituents informed as to what our congress and administration is up to whenever possible.
@DarthXile: Reiji took a string of words out of context after he skipped over the word "thoroughfare." In fact the Chinese version clearly and concisely explained exactly what I meant. The article was translated by hand and then typed, not thrown into Google Translate. If you've had any experience with it, you'll know that the translations are grossly incorrect and are completely inaccurate. Try it for yourself some time 😉
各位, 我剛打了幾個回復. 如果您有任何問題翻譯成中文而需要翻譯, 請給我留言. 我可以留言中回復一份翻譯版本給您.
Before you insult my English ability, you should look over what you have written one more time:
"Guangdong and Fujian are Indonesia’s thoroughfare to the northern areas of China such as Korea and Japan"
Whether or not I missed the word "thoroughfare" is inconsequential. It says that this thorough fare runs to the northern areas of China. You give examples of those northern areas of China: Korea and Japan.
I am not mudslinging. I am only concerned for the well-being of China. My own country has also suffered an influx of Americans who suddenly ran for office. These people have all received donations from the Military Airlift Command. It looks like you are not affiliated with that organization, but rather the First Armored Division. In any case, I am only looking out for the interests of my friends.
voted
Reiji, if you look at who runs First Armored Division, you'll find that it belongs to the eUS Marine Corps. I was enlisted with the Marines for a period of one week following my resignation as US Army Vice Chief of Staff and transferring to the USMC. It is well documented in this same paper, and you will find that the donations correspond to the one week I served with the USMC.
In regards to Japan's current political situation, you are pulling me along with other citizens of your country on the sole reason that I am from the eUnited States. I clearly explained my rationale for leaving the eUS and explained my rationale in running for Congress in China this upcoming term.
If you have an impeccable grasp for the English language, then perhaps a deeper dig of my donation records, investigating who runs which organizations, and get a clearer view of my history before you make wild, unproven, and slanderous comments against me right before a congressional election.
You are complaining that foreign powers may be manipulating internal infrastructures of other countries, yet by creating these ambiguous and false claims you are doing the exact same thing, manipulating citizens of another country from running a clean, drama-free political campaign.
Again, if you have further inquiries as to my donation records and potential ties to my former employer(s), I would kindly suggest that we take this the the IRC chatroom that you and I are both in the channel, but somehow you refuse to talk to me on there - which once again brings me to continue questioning your true intentions.
I haven't accused you of anything, you may notice. I only asked for explanations and then explained my reasoning for asking for an explanation. Please don't accuse me of accusing.
As for why my inquisitions are not private, I think these are important questions for the public. It certainly benefits you to have your explanations out in the open, no?
Again, let me defend myself and say I am slinging no mud and making no accusations. I say one more active, dedicated member of the Chinese government is a benefit for all of Asia.
搬板凳看掐架。。。
我想發表聲明 - 我這次回國不是來PTO中國. 老實說PTO在我的個人看法是很無聊.
PTO的最重要條件是要達到一個國家的大眾數才可以成功... 但現在只有我一人是從美國過來的. 那麼我單獨一人這麼可以搞PTO呢?
我是用英語回答Reiji應為他是日本國民, 但我可一張我所有的回覆翻譯成中文來保留紀錄. 如果有這個需要, 請給我留言.
English I would like to make an official statement that my purpose of returning to China is not to PTO the country. Personally, I believe PTOs are lame.
The most important part of a successful PTO is to gain a majority control of the government, but I'm the only one running who is from eUS this around. How would I be able to PTO a country by myself?
I have been using English to respond to Reiji's comments because he is a Japanese citizen, but I am able to translate all of my responses into Chinese for recordkeeping purposes as necessary. If the necessity is present, please let me know and I'll gladly oblige.
Why... would you use English just because I'm Japanese? My country's language is Japanese.
而且, 我事实上是 中华民国公民。 虽然我的母语是日语, 但是我从小说国语。
I use English because I have returned all of my Japanese I learned from high school back to my teachers there. 😃
Plus, if I just started saying randomly and grossly incorrect Japanese sentences like "何上" for What's up... you would probably cringe. 😃
Love the enthusiasm and best of luck but I would like to clearify so there is no revision of history:
"China’s foreign policy has always been, and until announced otherwise, neutral in international affairs. The reason is simple, every time there’s a world conflict, somehow eChina always gets sucked in to the conflict and then when there is resolution, eChina is left in pieces while the superpowers of the world ignore the reconstruction the warfare left behind."
We've never been carved up by being abandoned, sidelined, or neglected due to any wars. New eChina has only been around since Feb/Mar 2009 and even then there were only like 50 citizens for the first several months and only 1 was RL Chinese.
We were in fact completely politically absorbed (Chinese president was Iranian and surrendered all our regions) by Iran, which had much more citizens than our dozen players, for our resources. Later some of those regions have changed hands. Over time, as our population has risen, we have regained regions for various reasons. We have yet to lose a single region since New eChina was founded with just 2 regions; despite 3 wars (where we were never aggressor nor target).
So we have never been "left in pieces", we just always have been.
The New eChina is simply the reincarnation of the old one. It was run by the same people at first and in the same manner. We still are left in pieces, the old eChina has Liaoning and the first eChina had Heilongjiang. . .
you deserve freedom from oppressors... vote
I support DarthXile。。。
Voted !
agree with mariohexu, can u be more specific as to HOW we are getting these regions back? At the very least, what's your plan?
歡迎JLT回流中國!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/battles/show/7970" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/battles/show[..]7970
Protect Jilin!
If you can wait till later today (erep day), wait and fight later.
Fight in your last login everyday.
專業啊……
希望Jameson兄繼續為eChina獻計, 創造多元e社會
What's this, finally some action! And a well written article, with an English version to boot! Looks like I may have to come out of two clicking "vacation." 😉
像真的一样