[TGitW] Thank Ginger it's the Weekend
Neil Lewis
Welcome to this week's edition of Thank Ginger it's the Weekend!
Sadly, this is the last edition of TGIF/TGitW, due to some pratt's small-mindedness in reporting last week's edition. if this disappears into the digital ether, you know who to blame!
As screen-shots are needed to confirm anything, here you go:
So, on with the show:
I recommend checking out the episode of "Doctors" from 4/12 on the iPlayer;
there's a scene where this lady has one ankle behind her ear
😛
The now mandatory Leanna Decker GIF drop
😛
And, finally, the other GIF drop:
Karen Gillan approves of this article
Disclaimers:
1) TGitW does not have the rights to the images posted above & they may be withdrawn by the owners, so apologies for any later broken links.
2) TGitW does not take responsibility for loss of consciousness due to rushes of blood to certain regions of the body.
The game-related bit:
it was beginning to look a whole lot better under suezo
Comments
It's disappointing how the last one of these is a particularly bad one...
tbh .. I really couldn't be bothered .. why put in a lot of work searching for good pics if it's going to get reported out of spite
mentioned \o/
Dude I've had articles deleted, been banned, had FPs and been called every name under the Sun in this game. Just roll with the punches, if you enjoy doing the articles then do them. Feck what other people think o/
I like how you endorsed this s*it just to get his vote on elections. You sold yourself so cheap. Little cheap slut. lol
Live and let live. I'd rather more articles than less and if Neil enjoys it then let it continue. Plus I did endorse prior to the edits!
I'd say keep doing them, but I can understand if you want to stop.
Nooooooooo! Don't let the trolls take Leanna away from us! Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/25-comments-part-3-of-4--2473266/1/20
right, as there seems to be some support to carry on, how can I crow-bar some game-related stuff in here to protect it from being deemed "spam"
Include a small screenshot of the map with a caption - ''isn't Brazil doing well'' then hammer the **** out of the thing with redheads.
Don't bother. iAdastros is being an ar*ehole. Just publish and be damned as someone probably important once said.
(and do the thing Dr Hugh said just to be sure)
Yeah, I'm a troll for taking issue with the way that Neil scours the internet for borderline underage girls profiles that he can lift pictures from and display them on websites without their consent
Its disgusting, and I will continue to report them
a) I don't "scour" - a simple google search is enough.
b) If you think Lindsay Lohan is "borderline underage" you are sadly deluded.
c) I avoid copyrighted images. I only host them on my photobucket as some links don't work on here and I was advised this is a way around it by the admins. Plus, there is a caveat in the disclaimers.
d) If you don't like, do your own article .. or get a life, as others clearly support me!
I wasn't referring to this article necessarily, in the past you have used some images of girls of questionable age.
Fundamentally, you really should be getting the women's permission before using their photos (unless they are a professional actor/model etcetera)
Considering you're not one to refrain from reaching for the report button on things you don't like, this is all rather hypocritical tbh neil
as the sources are photo-sharing sites (the majority come from facebook groups) I presume consent has been given and age checked. as i'm not making any monetary gain (endorsement is not openly requested) the issue of copyright law is slightly a moot point.
regarding hypocrisy .. people in glass house, etc, etc, etc ...
I'm not referring to copyright law Neil, idk where you've come up with that.
Its a matter of personal ethics, as they really isn't a great deal of clarity in the law over personality rights (which refers just to commercial gain and the like). For me, its pretty simple: Public Figures, be they Actors, Politicians or anyone who voluntarily puts their face, their image into the public domain has given implicit consent for their image to be shared. In my case, I'm pretty sure that Neil Patrick Harris has no concerns with his image being shared on the internet and in public otherwise would he be an actor?
In the case of the girls in your article, like you say you google search them and pull the photos from there- they could be from twitter, tumblr, facebook or any manner of sites- and you have no idea how old they are. None at all- Facebooks limit is 13 so you could easily have put minors in your artices on previous occasions without even knowing it. As members of the public, and potentially underage girls, its really not on for you to appropriating their photos for your own use without their consent in my opinion- if you're really comfortable with that, then w/e.
Yeah I reported your article (hey I actually have the balls to say when I report an article and outline my reasons for doing so) and I think I will ticket the admins to ask their stance on the issue.
That Barney guy from 'How I met your mother' who you use in your avatar...nice to see he gave you his consent to use his image...can you put in a good word so i can get a signed photo? 😉
He's a professional actor...
Technically you are still using his image without his permission. Makes no beef to me but does a prostitute deserve to be raped because she is in the sex trade? Does a child deserve to be beaten because they are Welsh? Of course not...apart from the Welsh kid but full time actor or not doesn't mean you can steal his image without giving credit to the owner of said image, or gaining permission.
To pretend this is a child safeguarding issue and not your pathetic little feud is sick, what sort of low life uses fake concern about the sexual exploitation of children to score “points” in a game?
My concern is completely genuine Alan, whether or not you choose to believe me is entirely up to you. Secondly, why are you slamming for having a 'pathetic little feud'? Fairly sure that its Neil with the vendetta against me, after all, he was the one trying to order RN members to report all articles I write?
I do not believe you because you didn't report the”questionable images” at the time you only became morally outraged and concerned about image rights after you got upset about comments he made to and about Alex.
A lot of us have been reporting them since he started...
Alan, I've only ever scanned these articles in the past, if read them at all. It was only pointed out to me relatively recently the kind of pictures neil is using (I previously assumed they were all public figures). Its only then I've paid attention to it
Wayne I doubt that someone who choose a homophone of w*nker as his screen name is genuinely worried about offending people.
I didn't say anything about being offended by them. I just dislike gingers...
creep
Reported creepy article for intellectual property theft.
6 to midnight.
Sour grapes I reckon aas I've just proved you can't get subs/comments for a straight article so one has to do something slightly out of the ordinary. There's another way but that is being picky and slagging someone off!!