國際關係 - International Relations Review - day 2025
Lyau
本報上一篇文章受到眾人關注,小弟簡直受寵若驚,先在此多謝各位支持。
由於本人實在太喜愛Excel還有數字,我又花了"一點"時間完善我的e外交模型。 😮
) 現在,我的外交模型基本完成,每次更新也不過花個五分鐘十分鐘,因此本報打算自本星期開始作出每周國際關係簡報,作一個記錄,也討個自己好玩的。
本文評論不多,主要統計eC與十二個較重要之國家的外交關係。 (為減輕本文沉悶程度,統計方法置於文末)
1為關係甚佳,-1為不佳。
先看eC,eCroatia & eROC:
eC基本中立,沒有跟隨eCroatia的外交政策,也沒有偏向eROC的。 兩大傳統盟友怎麼了(真心唔知)。 eCroatia則偏向CoT的外交策略,有最大的共同敵人。 而eROC則成為了TWO的Trail Member?! 聽聞85不太喜歡eUSA(?,求證),而eSerbia 是一向的敵人。 面對盟友,eC左右做人難。
再看TWO 及CoT一眾:
eSerbia與CoT 及eCroatia 前陣子開始的大戰明顯做成兩大集團間惡劣關係。
另外有一個間題,就是eMacedonia怎麼了? MPP eSerbia?
而直得注意的是,一眾高輸出"中立國"看似與TWO關係較佳。(?)
本分析文純供本人自high好玩,隨意看看就好。有正反意見或評擊也可。
本單元報導到此為止,統計方法詳見下段。
Methodology
The eDiplomacy Model assigns two types of score to each pair of countries.
Direct score based on:
1) MPP contract (Positive effect)
2) NE status (Negative effect)
3) Membership of Alliance (Positive effect)
Indirect score based on:
4) Consistency of MPP policy* (Positive effect)
5) NE status of their MPP contracted countries and/or Alliance (Negative effect)
*The model use the correlation coefficient of the two countries' MPP policy as the proxy of score.
Example illustrates the relation of Country A and Country B
1) They have no MPP contract. (no score)
2) They are not NE for each other. (no score)
3) They are in the same Alliance. (positive score assigned)
4) Their MPP partners are more or less the same. (positive score assigned)
5) One of the MPP partners of Country A but not B (say, Country C) NE Country B. (negative score assigned)
and then the sum of all five component scores come to the final score.
Comments
先v后看。。。
v
给力!
但是为什么不列入巴西?
我本以為巴西很弱. 下期加入巴西
v+s
V
表面看來, 也沒有哪個大國 對我們存在特別好的觀感
Awesome work🙂
不错的分析~
計量真是無所不入
該好好學習!
推
V31 加油 eC需要好报纸·
V+S
这么看来eC 要么选 croatia, 要么选 tw, 脚踏两船看来是不可能的了?
its possible to be together
great analyses
很典型的酱油中立国数据……
V
好文 給9CC報費
Where are the results of this analysis?
lol... The results are simply those graphs. I focused on 13 countries that is relative important for eC. Though I do have a full result of all 70 countries. I do added some comments in Chinese but they are not really that relevant.
Maybe I will consider to make a English version of the next report next week if there is a considerable amount of English readers, or, if not, simply post a link showing the full result in graphs so that non Chinese reading players can also enjoy it.
I didn't see any graphs this morning, but I do now.
V
觉得ROC还是更好的选择,毕竟EC,ROC绝对是互相信任的盟友,但是克罗地亚就不一定了
you sure?😁
why you should choose?
V68
太长不看 vvvvvvv