Join the new world

Please note that the program does not radically change the country or the course of the government.

This is funny so the communist and co will continue the same program/course as a rightwinged government? That doesnt make sense.

But good luck to you

LSD is by far the largest party in this coalition and was also in the previous coalition, so do you think it's weird that the course isn't that different?

Yes Derkk because now instead of an equal sized right winged party there is a communist party.

Do you think communist are right winged? So will things be the same? No they wont.

Yes, there is a communist party, a communist party with 2 congress seats versus 12 for LSD.

Being a communist myself I think I quite clearly know what communists are.

Will things be the same? No, but the coalition program is mainly based on what LSD wants, since they have the majority. So you wouldn't expect to see differences there, huh?

voted and supported!

> The "fun" factor is important, it must be cool again to be part of the elites. Defense should publish articles about this, and statistics from battles the elites fought in.

--

everyone is in congress these days so good luck

I will vote no on this government based on a mongol SS I&I, an 'information officer' who can't bother to speak english, and a MoESC team with no clue on economics. Overall there is very little experience in this government.

Although yes there are also good names in it, I will not deny that. Would just like to see some others replaced.

Communies in government... NOOOO

"I will vote no on this government based on a mongol SS I&I, an 'information officer' who can't bother to speak english, and a MoESC team with no clue on economics."

A poorly written sentence, ironically enough!

Luckily Garmr, I'm a native speaker, so I'll be able to proof-read any material prior to publication.

Still doesn't change the fact that you are inexperienced and can only make poor attempts to draw support with sweet-talking.

Also poor english 😕= not speaking english

You should read better, ironically.

Vote of confidence has been starte😛 http://www.enetherlands.nl/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=6471&p=74692#p74692

@Garmr, i would rather like to hear some constructive arguments why you will vote "no" on the government, and thus on the coalition program.

@Tim Veltkamp: i still think it must be possible to build an elite team, which exists of more than only 3 people.

Garmr this implication unexperienced people can't do well is exactly the elitistic behaviour that made sure most/all of our new players quit the day after they started.

Though he does have a point to some extent pitkaman frerk 😃 Especially on Briepe, a member who failed to write in english on multiple accounts and was not in any way punished for this, even though congress rules state that when writing in those forums, we should always do so in English. So yeah, thanks for upholding the laws everybody 😃

Well shakerr the only constructive comment I can give is really to replace some gov members.

@ Garmr, As far as I know economics works very close together with finance.

I agree with you that we have members with less experience in this government, but I think on the other hand we have also very much experience on finance.

About the dutch post of one of the government members. That's something that should be countered by the Chairman of the congress,(as the rules says english post at the congress) and doesnt have anything to do with the current job he have.

ik zal mijn best doen om in het congres engels te schrijven maar of je ja of nee nou in het engels of in het nederlands doet is toch weinig verschil. en hier reageren mag gewoon in het nederlands

lol so much for english

"ik zal mijn best doen om in het congres engels te schrijven maar of je ja of nee nou in het engels of in het nederlands doet is toch weinig verschil."
If it doesnt make much of a difference according to yourself, then it would be better to just follow the rules and do everything in English in Congress.

Briepe je bent gewoon een domme kneus. Ga lekker een ander spel doen.

garmr wat ben jij dan?
ken jij soms het hele spel?
maak jij nooit een fout?

[removed]

Snel genoeg AI, snel genoeg. Het spel heet RL.

Garmr, shut up! Hou je kop dich, hou je klep dicht, dicht die waffel!

guys, can we just keep it a bit normal here?

+1 Dev. One more comment like above, and I will delete and repost my article to get rid of the flame war (or not repost at all...)

Wth is this?

Gamrr makes a valid argument in my opinion. English is the language required on the forum, so just talk in English so everyone understands. Going around calling people names isn't really mature, let alone good politics, AI and Shaker.

To the second point: I voted no. I can't accept any government that includes Pierre Delveaux. I can't understand that any government that takes itself serious would include him. I've been here for some time now, and I can't say how his ads 'how long is your lijst' etc. have bugged me. Not just the utter stupidity of them, but the fact he made them (and still makes point just like it) with not even a hint of shame.

And on the possible remark "what doesn't qualify me for government" by P.D. himself: the question is: "what DOES?"

@Mael Dunbar: you actually read the comment of Garmr? and you find it ok? Great, that's fine if that is your opinion.
@Mael Dunbar: perhaps you have something to say about the coalition program also? because i didn't heard any arguments about that one. Only about a member of this new government. with your "no" you also say "no" to this coalition program 😉

" perhaps you have something to say about the coalition program also?"

Nop. The Delveaux-thing is pretty much the only dealbreaker, imo.

And I read garmrs reply. It isn't very nice either, but he's the one who makes an actual point in the discussion.
The fact that that guy replied in Dutch on a comment that he's supposed to speak english ís quite dumb.

"It isn't very nice either"
orly

I'm saying that where garmr made a comment on 'dumb', it was a valid one, allthough maybe not necessary.
The other guy(s)was (were) just 'calling names'.
I'm sure if you give it some thought, you'll see the difference.

Well, in fairness Mael, I've only been offered a relatively junior position in government; I won't be altering the course of our nation. That said, if it's going to be that much of a problem for people, I have no objections to being replaced.

However, your reflexive support of Garmr, a man who drunkenly tried to lead this country into an illegal war, undermines your self-righteous fury somewhat.

Actually I had allready raised the question on who you were and if you were serious or joking on our forum. This before the proposal of government. Upon confirmation that you were serious I took an immediate dislike to you as an online person, as you don't seem to have a high opinion of your fellow eUNL-ers.

So to try and shrug off my opposition as reflexive and in the same sentence link it to terms as drunk, illegal and self-righteous, and all that based on the fact that garmr ALSO has somewhat the same inhibitions regarding to your character.

The second part of your reply just confirms the idea I have of you.

Dear goverment,

Just ine little question: Who I do have to adress to start a coffeshop?

Huge ROI, good for the economy -turists- ...and for the goverment...all damn hippies too stoned to cause any trouble..

Awaiting your news,

Willem Alexander III

howdy all -

just dropped in to see how my dying was going ... and THIS?

maybe more than anyone else, i appreciate that people with no RL political xp tend to make asinine pronouncements on politics. i must say though, that these rants & vendettas [going both ways] takes the cake.

v2 may have finished the game for me, but the teenage drivel contributed along the way, get a job, run in a RL election, make your own bed ...

good luck eUNL govt.