[Congress: 07/04] Tax Raise Proposal + Budget Discussions

Day 3,060, 12:53 Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom by Speaker of the House

So a few days ago there was a meta-game Congress Election, and the result was the following:


ESO: CheetahCurtis, Aleksandar.V Popovic,Mr Cherry, Sir Jimmy Saville, Joe Lydon, Kieran crowte, Huey George, JiminyChristmas

UKRP: Frixios of the Clyde, Sir Humphrey Appleby, Boaty McBoatface, Sambo223, Kapten Johnson, Hail Astrid, Gali2332

BP: William Ross, Prince Harry, Mary Jane Hawksmore, Yigit Can Balta, Asylum Clown, The Moon King

TUP: Paul Tyndale, dougal4chaos, jamesw, Amokkel, Mr Brilliant, Madelina de moi, Rathena Gelc, 1 Vacant Seat.

UKPP: Two Vacant Seats.

UKPP appear to be boycotting this congress and have put nobody forward to take their seats and Rathena is the CP, so Congress currently has 28 members.

If you are a Congress Member and do not have me as a friend, add me so you can be added to the PMs


Legitimacy

Due to the very low number of votes on the election that brought this Congress into being, I do not think that this Congress can exercise the same level of legitimacy that regularly elected Congress’ do.

In my opinion it would be best for Congress to only deal with pressing matters that need urgent attention. We are talking Peace Treaties, NEs, CO money requests and so on.

So I am invoking the Common Sense rule and arguing that it would be unjust for this Congress to do the following:

Things we will not be doing: Passing any bills, Impeaching the President or doing anything other than the basics needed to keep the government function. I will publish any proposal made to me, with written reasons if I decide its something that this Congress shouldn’t deal with. As for Impeachment of the CP, unless it is very obvious (such as inactivity or malice towards the eUK) I don’t think it would be fair for somebody elected on a turnout of 200 votes to be turfed out by those elected on less than half that number in a meta-game election.

We simply do not have the legitimacy to start redefining the eUK, and anything this congress did would risk simply being struck down by the next Congress.


Edit: After reading some of the comments and replies to this, I think a more nuanced approach here will be more appropriate, particularly to stop this congres from just being a waste of time.

So I think Congress should function normally, with the caveat that all bills passed by this Congress include a clause requiring them to be ratified by the next elected congress. I think that makes up a fair solution, and I thank Woldy for suggesting it.


Sensitive Current Debates and Proposals

Congress has concluded voting on a Peace Deal with our opponents that had been marked as sensitive by Rathena. The Vote finishe😛

9 Ayes
1 No
4 Abstains.

Full results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VLP-mPGfT5jLiqxZ5QwVJ_X-ziGS30zmZFhaZHG-zq4/edit#gid=391117350

Public Debates and Proposals

VOTE- FightAndProduce’s Budget: https://docs.google.com/document/d/151fqCgde45D1OZrYHitkj0j_5haCGGv0xIwEZt6ugGQ/edit (Begun 11:30am BST 07/04)

VOTE- Raising Work Tax to 6%, Proposed by Rathena Gelc. (Vote Begun 21:30 07/04- 24hrs)

To Cast your votes comment below this article



Committees: Applications for Committees are open, nominate yourself here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DBpP9RbWY6aRWEdv58zdauVMXHM7foUX2UPaaCIBa58/viewform

Cheers,

Ad
Spkr