Join the new world

I reckon you could have fit that one long sentence in the feed you know

I urge people to vote no Congress has procedure and I am allowed to ask questions and debate.

If you read your messages you will see Huey is advocating we vote no until we have concluded the debate.

I love your article though because its Irrelevancy in relevancy or as we like to call it SPAM! Keep up the good spiffing work

[removed]

Congress get a big button asking them to decide things - they are by definition relevant

I vote no unless previously discussed.

v + c

YCB,

Its been 2659 days since you last wrote an article that wasn't connected to a mission for comments/endorsing.

So firstly, thank you for your increased activity and contributing to the national debate - its only by having people like yourself engaging and talking will we had a rich game that will encourage more people to stick around.

Secondly, if this was hamstringing the Gov so much - do you think the CP would also be voting it down?

https://snipboard.io/DhNBgP.jpg

Trust me I'd rather not be publishing these kinds of articles but I have felt my hand has been forced to such drastic measures. CP is an elected leader and has to adhere to congress decisions so I believe he, like myself, was forced to by trs and their bs policies. STOP THE CAP lets play the game

As per the PM

We have very healthy reserves, there shouldn't be any delays due to funding.

Basic maths show that 12mil > 7mil and therefore a donation every day is not required - so there is no reason to press on before we come to an agreement.

No-one is arguing to stop all donations. Only to agree what we're doing with them first. The gov will have the cash it needs to meet its mandates.

agreed and voted

All this meta nonsense is such a wate of time, we all know the government has to be funded.

The only meta thing congress does of any note is immigration control and I am beginning to think this is a waste of time also even though I was a strong supporter of it.

Very interesting to see many TUP members voting against Huey’s advise.

Maybe being anti meta would make an interesting manifesto for a TUP CP Candidate

TUP's meta methods for selecting CP candidates and Congress lists are legendary so that would be interesting

Much depends on whether people see the eUK Congress as a retirement home, where they collect their 5g per month in return for rubber stamping whatever proposals are put forward. Or whether they believe they are actually the ones who, considering they have many of the buttons needed for an eCountry to function, should be armed with the knowledge that enables them to carry out their duties in an informed manner.

whats the problem now?

the spamicups are trying to hold up funds from being donated, as always but now with a new force of brainwashed fools

Why do I get the feeling that if Huey asked for it to be rejected and the Spamicians voted Yes anyway, TUP and allies would be rejecting the vote as requested by Huey. And then complaining about Spamicans doing it to ruin the economy etc...

Seems right now the TUP's policies is

a) claim to be the opposite of what the Spamicians pledge.
b ) 20 goto 10

If Huey askes us for something then we have to consider and vote on it, but Huey didnt ask the spamlets are the ones orchestrating this. I feel inclined to call out bs when I see it, especially if its going to effect me financially and effect the citizens that depend on gov funds. There is no reason to die on this hill but the spamsicles insist this is something we need. They're members have been trying to vote down donations for months now, this is just another day in their policies.

"Huey didnt ask the spamlets are the ones orchestrating this"

I'm not in congress to know if Huey specifically reached out and asked the Spamicans specifically to vote against, but Huey himself also voted AGAINST it. The TUP etc historically are always insistant on Huey's finance genius and follow his advice. The Spamicians, as far as I can see, are the only ones who are following Huey's position on this.

So do you trust Huey on this? Is Huey now incompetent and deliberately voting against the best interests of the country?

"They're members have been trying to vote down donations for months now, this is just another day in their policies."

Looking at the last 6 donation votes, there have been 13 votes against made up of

4 x GOAT (King William)
4 x SPAM (Capt Chazbeard 3 times, AMD once)
4 x UKRP (Select2😎
1 x TUP (Inferios81)

Personally I am not seeing a SPAM lead campaign here.

And if you go back much further pre-SPAM, the party who had members who'd most frequently had its representatives voting against BoE donations was...... TUP. I don't remember TUP complaining when its own members were regularly voting against.

While it might be the case the Spamicians have been arguing about some of the spend (I'm not in congress so not in a position to say) there is a distinct lack of evidence of it being Spamican policy to vote down donations.

^ one of the votes had no people voting against the donations, and one vote where just King William voted.

To add on to Mr Knee’s analysis, over half of last months donation votes were also proposed by Spam party members