The Big Crasher: what did he say?!
JdlF
Hello dear citizens,
Today as a sarcastic measure we will refer to me as "The Big Crasher" or TBC. Firstly, here at The Big Crasher we'd like to thanks all our fans among the government and we fully support the fact you want someone to blame. Don't hesitate, TBC's activity is quite low.
So, after the sarcastic part, let's dig into few questions.
Dear readers, again I'm writing full blocks of texts - with some meme. It's always better with meme. I know it's boring to read. I don't really mind if you read it or not. This article is more for me, as a mean of clearing my point of view. And a response to overall debates I had with few from the government. I've written it as a question/answer interview type. Questions are from me this time. If you want to ask me any question: just stay clear and polite. I'm really tired of being insulted by few.
1. Do PTOers exist?
Yes. I never said no. Even if I call most of them "called PTOers" it is due to two facts: First, they did nothing really harmfull yet so ... Not guilty before acts. Second, I don't want to emphase things on people or energize them.
2. Is wipe bad? And why.
On the overall a wipe isn't bad. I even planned one when I was CP (in case). But a wipe must be done as the last resort and with a master plan. A master plan involving three main things: activity, kind of democracy and supplies. Sadly as it was done, activity wasn't ensured and democracy has been cut. After few times, even our supplies (treasury) has been wasted. Which leaves us with an empty shell where nobody can come... We are stuck with 167 citizens, no-one can coming (unless creating new account), no democracy at all, no real activity and we have to cut our programs due to the waste.
3. How to make a good wipe?
Simple, first put new rules for a congress. Draw objectives (like 2 month wipe or even internal stabilization). Stock lot of supplies because you'll live in autarky.
4. Why do you say the PTOer policy is crap?
Because the called group of PTOers (among them: real PTOers but also a significative part of random citizens wanting changes) is in eBelgium for months. Therefore you can't believe they will leave faster than random/neutral citizens who are here only for supply programs or just "because". Also, emphasizing on someone will just make him more active. So the more you hit (with no consequences remember) on them, the more they are active. Proof? They have never been as active as these 4 last months. Another proof? The Big Crasher is active right now just in response of all the credits given by TheValeyard (thanks again).
5. What would you do?
As I've said from time to time: letting them doing their stuff and focus on the country. An happy country is a no-ptoed country. Lately government tried to PTO (so basically using bad means) a called PTO party. Result? Government lost 1 party because they split votes. For one year (or a bit less), PTOers were not a problem. It started a bit with the PTOing of HOPE from another "democratical party" [edit: according to El1teBE, it was a state decision with much parties involved - which is true at some point; fact is, idea and most activity came from RB]. Then their activity went slightly down as some citizens tried to lower tensions with them (The Big Crasher included). Of course incoming continued, sadly. But not that fast.
6. You didn't answer about the wipe, did you?
No. Because as I've said wipe should have been used as the last resort and perfeclty planned. So a wipe could have been a good thing. Nowadays what? Well I don't know, we are so few hat we are REALLY under a PTO threat. From actual PTOers? Well yes and no... We are under ANYONE threat. With so few citizens left, any chief scout could PTO us in just a month asking his boys to register. But yeah, as this is an endless situation I still would say: unwipe, because staying wiped means nothing anymore. If we have to be PTOed, let it be as we are already crushed.
7. What about the treasury? You are blaming mostly MQ and NLSP on that.
Well indeed, as I've said a good wipe needs good reserves so wasting our reserves were not clever at all. Moreover wasting our reserves in the attempt of making PTOers leaving was poor. As I've said it's emphasizing on a group so making them more active. Moreover The Big Crasher that I am already secured 80 to 90% of the treasury tthrough bnak managers (meaning that the treasury was not in an ORG but in few citizens hands - sadly MQ and NLSP). So let's sum up: Wasting an already secured treasury. Jeoparadize the wipe. Emphasizing on a group. Nearly all I would not do. Genius.
8. Do you believe they did that on purpose?
No, I believe they did what they think was the best for eBelgium. Sadly MQ is not the best at taking decisions and NLSP don't overthink most of his ideas. Mq is a good adviser knowing everything on anything and NLSP is a good decision taker, not hesitating a second. We needed someone to make plans, sadly.
9. Any grudges?
Of course! I've been insulted for over a month by NLSP for being CP candidate. It's something you don't forget when it comes to an online game! While I did striclty ... Nothing. But I still love MQ, despite the fact she missed the point by trusting the other one. I did the same before (trusting too much an adviser I mean). Nobody is perfect. Sadly they didn't correct their policy.
10. You speak like you are right and others wrong, do you know that?
The Big Crasher knows that! But well, as refered lots of time, it's only The Big Crasher's opinion. Only thing is, The Big Crasher arguments most of the time when it comes to numbers and so on. Moreover it's better to think you are right than wrong when you want to pass a message. The Big Crasher is good with automotivation and autopersuasion.
"My armour is like tenfold shields, my teeth are swords, my claws spears, the shock of my tail is a thunderbolt, my wings a hurricane, and my breath death!"
-Smaug, another Big Crasher, doing autopersuasion and automotivation because he knows hobbits are too dangerous.
Regards,
The G... Big Crasher
Comments
Nice article.
It's clear that if I'd been active in politics, I would have proposed a "third option" different from what we have now, with people that are not too involved in each extremism (in favor or against PTO groups).
The solution will probably come from that. One day.
Outstanding article, vote.
1. They disregarded the countries laws and customs, attacked and outright insulted members of this community. Those are facts you choose to ignore.
2. What is a wipe: a protective measure you and your friends have worked on to make them fail the first two times it was tried and people attempted other solutions (inviting ATO groups) to stall the wipe. While I agree it's better to debate it openly, the fact remains that you empowered the hostile eBelgians and the two small foreign PTO groups they managed to invite in, requiring a far longer wipe for it to be an effective solution.
3. You still have time to install this, nothing stops you from that aside from your lack of action.
4. People get that you don't like the wipe because you don't see the end of the tunnel, well the end is hard to predict. If certain groups of people hadn't resisted a wipe for so long the problem would already have been solved.
5. PTO becomes an increasingly large problem as their numbers grow.
6. Loser mentality, exactly what a PTO group would be hoping to find.
7. What did you need these reserves for ? A better way to land them in your personal pockets ? A state shouldn't have 3000% of annual tax income in reserves.
8. And TBC is good at making decisions, or just good at planning to be absent for a whole week of a CP term and not letting his voters and supporters know ? Perfect plan to get elected.
9. You deserve to be shunned, after lying to your electorate, after abandoning your government in times of need, after holding congress hostage with the money from BM. And you can hold grudges but that doesn't stop you from working together with others when facing a third party threat.
10. You know ofcourse that it's my opinion that I'm right and you're misguided.
I could not say it better. 100 percent support.
I could answer false accusations...
But not 😃. Trololol face \o/.
Tell me which one is false so I can provide you the proof for it.
Hear Hear
I strongly disagree with your point 7.
But really don't feel like arguing because it seems everybody (you included) lost its common sense of objectivity in order to defend by all means its final opinions and any argument is torn and switched to fit to his side.
Sorry.
I do have my common sense :'(
Jeiry, I'm certain there is a use in having a reasonable amount of money in the treasury as reserves for cases like the present one. That is also why I was at the origin of the forum law requiring for 500,000 cc to remain in the treasury. I think it's a pitty people never found a way to get you to participate in more debates because contrary to what my hard style of debating might suggest, I'm reading every view and taking it into consideration. At one point in the past, I tried to implement a "take into account the treasury needs to last 9 months on the expenses you make in one month."-idea. This has not been followed and instead, more money got put into state accounts through competition rewards of the admins.
Perhaps it was spent too fast to get lasting benefits but the fact is that it had been necessary to spend a good part of the treasury for over a year now and JdlF as MoF and as CP has never had an idea or the courage to propose new methods of spending to congress, However when NLSP implemented Gold schemes he has been on the first rows to fill his pockets. That is why I made the snarky comment.
The fact that BNA for example has no more supplies today is related to the manner in which money (up to 250.000 cc a month) was spent. The fact that it was spent this way and not in a manner to provide a structural solution for the future is due to certain elements in eBelgian society who can not cope with the fact that the "forum elite" wished to spend money to encourage cohesion and activity.
Do share though, today eBelgium still has around 300,000 cc and 450 Gold how much do you believe the country would need, and how much of these reserves could be spent ?
Of course I didn't waste money oO. I stocked.
To my opinion, eBelgium (being a very small country) needs to keep at any time the amount of money necessary to be able to face a long war against a much bigger country.
"be able to face" = pay enough foreign fighters to win fights.
"a long war" = not just a fight one day for one region, but a durable war lasting a few weeks.
" a much bigger country" = Poland would be too big to handle, but I'm talking of countries having the size of France or England.
NB : I don't care about alliances arguments, because alliances are changing over the time. On the long run, we need to try to rely on ourselves as much as possible, not depending on others.
I don't know how much that would be necessary, but when I read that we can't afford too many Mutual Protection Pact, I doubt that there's not enough in the treasury to fulfill that objectives. And if you have less than what's necessary to fulfill this objectives, then, to my opinion, we don't have enough money in treasury.
@JdlF: And stocking for the sake of stocking is wrong
@Jeiry: eBelgium can not win against any neighbours on its own, it doesn't matter how much money you throw at it. When it comes to regions, you're in a priviledged position, your regions are useless for your neighbours and your neighbours have regions that interest any big country so it's impossible for you to have a long lasting war with any enemy.
eBelgium however, must be one of the only nations that has more div4 high strength expats then high strength players that stayed inside the country. So when you look at Belgian output, in case of a serious attack, you're always able to count on a goodwill bonus from a large group of people. Often people who hold some form of soft power over other groups of people.
The main reason you can't afford MPP is that Congress moved all the money to orgs instead of letting some sit in the country accounts. The MoF seems to be unwilling or incapable of putting it back into the treasury.
To add to the problem, eBelgians don't buy their weapons on the eBelgian market. Big producers (or those capable of it with a Belgian market license) don't sell there either because there's not enough sales per day. There is no financial loyalty to the country and with the bot gone, and the consecutive government teams doing nothing to raise income outside of the tax mechanics there's no hope to get any form of decent income to those country accounts.
Another reason is that the financially solid players have left eBelgium over time and there is only very little employment inside the country.
Nohjis, what you say is correct :
- we can't rely on our small population in case of war (did I say something else ?).
- we have many expats willing to help us (thanks to them).
You're right !!
But does your comment change any single thing about my own comment above and the objective that I talk about ??? No.
These are additional facts. But it's not because we can rely on some expats (and I'm glad about it) that we can't keep a large amount of money to pay and attract as much as we can independent foreign fighters into our battles. It's one more think to add to our defense and it should be thought that way. In case of a close war, that could count, it's not a detail.
Jeiry, that still doesn't tell me how much you would want for that in the treasury. Realistically the maximum ever spent on a single war in eBelgium was about 500.000 cc, including emergency MPP (it can be more but I'm certain the current MoF could answer that)
I think the political option of keeping 5.000.000 cc in the treasury and not spending taxes on the population's needs (ie. investing in their strength and rank so that they're stronger and require less of a need for foreign help) is not a good political choice.
I don't know how much, I let that part to the Minister of Finance, I was just talking in term of objectives (with the feeling that the actual amount is not enough) and to your polemical point 7 "What did you need these reserves for?".
On first sight, if you're talking about 500.000 cc for a single war, I would say something like 2.000.000 cc as a reserve. But I'm not an expert.
Investing in population's ranking is also a good thing, but it also have its weaknesses (player quitting the game or changing nationality) and it shouldn't forbid us to count on a substantial currency reserve in case of a real war. It's a matter of national security (as much as we can talk like that for a game) and international independence.
The biggest amount in eBe history to spend on war, is exactly 500k cc, that has been spend from the end of MaryamQ's term (start of the wipe), up to the liberation of eBe (end of Fhae's december term). More than half of this was used during the liberation as CO.
While money certainly helps us, in the end what matters mostly is people throwing their personal resources into the battle or wide support from the involved country. There is no amount of money that could get us liberated from poland, against poland's explicit wishes.
The reserve we have right now, is actually quite comfortable as long as there is no national army. An national army is, if well supplied, a huge costs that eBe can't sustain with it's income. One can complain that certain government actions costed too much, however that money was distributed fairly over all eBe citizens that wanted to participate, while in the other case, it would just have gone to the select group part of BNA.
Structural supply systems have been used succesfully (and cost-cutting) in eBelgian Military MU's, however jalousy and false accusations have ended most of these systems. Like Nohjis said, "The fact that it was spent this way and not in a manner to provide a structural solution for the future is due to certain elements in eBelgian society who can not cope with the fact that the "forum elite" wished to spend money to encourage cohesion and activity."
Also, even holding a staggering 5.000.000 BEF, wouldn't be enough to fight back against poland. Maybe temporary we could destroy them, but in the end, we would lose. in that case, the endresult would be: loss of a huge amount of money without any real result and that money would mainly have gone to foreign mercenaries without any link to eBe. I think that supporting all our citizens (not only the forum-going ones) was a much better choice.
More was spent than needed to win if I remember well.
Note that I don't believe extra large amounts would be enough but I'm more focus on activity things like DOF and programs which are great ways to maintain some kind of community.
And yes a budget has to be maintained in case of war. Like it was used against eFrance by Alexandross.
Votado!!
Votado, si senhor!!!
memes 🙂
you're just too kind, jdlf, too kind.
Just for Nohjis (or something), next time the "It's not my fault' about eUK invading us \o/.
JdlF, you are not saying the truth:
5. HOPE was not PTOed by another "democratical party", as you say. In the so-called "PTO conversations" and in the so-called "PTO activity" were included members from 6 different political parties, among which the PP of your political party - ATO. Also, there were some citizens without political activity at that point of time. Yes, you were not included, probably because most of the eBelgians didn't trust you then. If you refer that Res Belgica PTOed HOPE, I need you to publicly apologize for not saying the truth, and please use facts instead of manipulations. Thanks in advance.
Few months ago, in Mai or June I don't remember. I'm not speaking of the two last attempts.
Yes, I am speaking of that too. And I have a proof that 3 or 4 respectful members from your Political Party, among which also was the PP of ATO at that point of time were included in that "Political Take Over" of HOPE, as you call it. You don't know about that, because that was confidential, and as I said - you were not considered trustworthy back than. 😉
I knew some were going there but it was not our party's call. We just sai😛 if you wanna go, do as you want (we're like that).
I know it, I was in the mass mp. Anyway if you want me to say it was a state move, I really don't care - at all.
So it was maybe a state dumb call again. Here.
you simply can't throw responsibilities to people who decided to help even when disagreeing, really: the responsibility stands on the people who actually take the decision, not to others.
you can't be surprised that you lose cohesion, when you behave like this with the other loyal players.
"the responsibility stands on the people who actually take the decision"
It reminds me the wipe from eUK \o/.
And if it's like the eUK wipe; blame is on me, not on the responsible/s (and look, this whole article is on me \o/ [kind of]).
Well, we all know that you were always saying that Res Belgica did not do anything for the sake of eBelgium, even when MaryamQ and I were always helping you while you were organizing all of those strategic voting forms. So, why should I bother proving that it was not Res Belgica's call? You will still say that it is RBs fault. 😉
Oh, and - you mean that it is you and only you to blame when you were organizing strategic votes? MaryamQ and I were only helping, even if we disagreed with you. - These are your words, not mine. 😉
I oversaw both president and congress elections, which were the elections which were important to me with the approval of the CP of the time (Instead some others tried to PTO HOPE and provoke a war with the UK against the CP and congress wishes during mcKitkat's term).
I tried to get the PTO parties out of the top5, with some siuccess.
I also oversaw party president elections to AVOID (I repeat TO AVOID) that loyal parties (like Res Belgica, or ATO, or TBD, or BLP) would have been PTOed by PTOers. It was a normal anti-PTO activity.
On the othere hand, the idea of PTOing other parties was not up to me. When I helped, I did it only to avoid you to do big failures: in fact, now that I left belgiun, when you tried alone to PTO the liberation front, the result was that you were counter-PTOed by them, and Res Belgica, for the first time since ever, taken over by PTOers!
So, please learn to understand the difference beween doing anti-PTO activity (defending parties from PTOs), and instead attacking other parties through PTO activity. I know that a lot of people thinks that it is the same thing (and acts and talks accordingly), but it is not: they're different activities.
So don't blane me when considering the PTO of other parties: because it was outside my responsibility.
Instead, if you want to blame me for defending parties (like R😎, until I left ebelgium, ok, i take full responsibilities: dear PTOers, if you failed to take over RB in the past, it's my fault!
It's true,it's mostly TC's fault, he's good at making statistics. He even has a forecasting algorithm for elections which was right for most of previous ones 😁'.
voted
I like those memes :3
-tl;dr: NLSP and MQ where the worst presidents ever
-I had high hopes of Fhae. He made some true (Kill the BNA, scare away the eBelgian traitors: MQ and NLSP), on other fields he failed (The insecure chinaman is still around, We're still not free, we are still PTO'd by the forum elite,...)
-Konrad's greatest and only positive contribution to eBE would be to leave for eGermany. But I heard they don't want him there either.
-We are growing, they are dying. This is mainly thanks to joyous articles such as the ones Fhae writes. They really motivate me to keep checking on erep after a long and hard day at work so I can have some good laughs. If it wheren't for these, I might have quit this game a long time ago.
Lol!
" They really motivate me to keep checking on erep after a long and hard day at work so I can have some good laughs. If it wheren't for these, I might have quit this game a long time ago."
That's what i've told some of them from time to time 😁. If you give a reason to fight, you give some fun 😛.
Like NLSP 2 months ago when I candidated out of nowhere xD. It was just because I was motivated 😁'.
Also: Great article! I couldn't have put it any other way.
Signed
the oldest eBelgian around and Belgian IRL.